I. The Good, the Bad
report released by Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD)
yesterday was unpinned by one cheery figure -- a net profit of $61M USD, or 9
cents per share. That's 12.5 percent higher than the average analyst
prediction. And it's a major departure from net loss of
$43M USD a year before (calendar Q2 2010).
Counterintuitively, revenue was the complete
opposite story. AMD's revenue of $1.57B USD was short of the analyst
prediction of $1.58B USD. And it represents a 2 percent drop from
calendar Q1 2011 and a 5 percent drop from a year ago.
In a way, this is good news as it shows strong
evidence that AMD's cost cutting is working better than expected. And
there's more interesting news to be gleaned from the report as well.
II. Desktop, Server Revenue Falls, Fusion Saves
CPU revenue held largely flat at $1.21B USD (it
actually fell just a few million, year to year), but that was only thanks to
"Fusion" advanced processing units, the Llano and
Brazos series. While AMD did not reveal an exact breakdown of
sales of Fusion mobile chips, other mobile CPUs, desktop CPUs, and server CPUs
it did comment that desktop and server sales were down. While it would
not say how much, it did say that the Fusion now accounted for 50 percent of
its sales revenue on the mobile side.
The Fusion APUs 
combine AMD's core designs with a low-end discrete GPU to produce a chip with
decent x86 CPU performance and much better than usual "integrated"
graphics performance. Given the competitive price, customers have been
embracing the product, which is perfect for budget laptops.
It's no big secret why AMD's desktop and server
revenue took a hit. AMD hasn't released a new core design since Phenom
II, which first hit the market in December 2008. And the last major
architecture redesign was in 2003 with the release of the Athlon
64/Opteron (K8) processors. That's set to change when AMD's Bulldozer core plows
into town later this year.
Bulldozer is built on a 32 nm process.
Bulldozer's answer to rival Intel Corp.'s (INTC)
single core + hyperthreading is a "module", which actually has two
cores. The result is more discrete resources, but not significantly more
space on die, according to AMD. Of course AMD has trailed Intel in CPU
design and manufacturing processes over the past several years, so it remains
to be seen in AMD can live up to its hype. It should be noted that Bulldozer was
expected for Q2 2011 and is behind schedule.
AMD's desktop and server revenue were further
impacted by reduced chip prices.
III. GPU Sales Post Bigger Drop
More troubling, AMD's GPU revenue fell 17 from Q2
2010 and 11 percent from Q1 2011. It appears rival NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA)
is picking up stream with its GeForce
500 series, which aired in November 2010. AMD also suffered from part
shortages -- its high
end Radeon HD 6990 GPU-- the most powerful single-slot solution on the
market today -- has been virtually entirely out of stock since April.
NVIDIA is preparing its Kepler architecture
(28 nm) for a Q4 2011 launch. Products with Kepler chips will
presumably be branded GeForce 6xx GPUs. AMD has promised to release its
own next generation CPUs Southern Islands (28
nm), in H2 2011, so it could presumably get the jump on its competitor. Southern
Islands will presumably be branded the Radeon 7xxx series.
Southern Islands, which contains both a die
shrink and a new graphics core design, is currently in mass production, so AMD
seems to be doing pretty good currently.
No one knows where AMD and NVIDIA currently sit in
market share. The best
numbers on hand come from back in May, which put AMD at 40.5
percent of discrete GPU sales and NVIDIA at 59.6. This is a reversal from
2010, when AMD briefly
took the lead in sales from NVIDIA.
While AMD may now be back to playing catch up,
discrete sales are only a part of the value equation of the GPU unit to AMD.
The great sales of Fusion are largely only thanks to AMD's GPU expertise,
which it acquired when it purchased ATI Technologies.
IV. Leadership Questions Loom
Most of the earnings facts and figures seems
pretty predictable to those who follow the company close, as does the near term
outlook. The only major question is one of leadership, with CEO Dirk
ouster. Mr. Meyer was reportedly dropped for failing to pursue emerging
business like smart phones and tablets, aggressively enough.
Since the shake-up, Thomas Seifert, the company's
chief financial officer, has been pulling double duty, also serving as the
chief executive. Meanwhile a hunt for a replacement has been carried out.
Mr. Seifert urged patience to investors,
commenting, "[The] search for a new CEO remains a top priority. The board
is pleased with the quality of the candidates interviewed and as confident in
its robust and active process. Meeting a timeline is not the driving force in
the search. Finding the right candidate is."