Print 16 comment(s) - last by Kiffberet.. on Jul 25 at 8:24 AM

AMD's Southern Islands GPUs and Bulldozer CPUs have reportedly entered production and are headed to market sometime in H2 2011.  (Source: Hot Hardware)

The hot-selling Fusion GPU+CPU chip, along with cost cuts, has helped save AMD's bottom line amid declines in other sectors, which await product refreshes.  (Source: Deborah Cannon/AMERICAN-STATESMAN)
AMD manages a small profit that beats analyst estimates

I. The Good, the Bad

The earnings report released by Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) yesterday was unpinned by one cheery figure -- a net profit of $61M USD, or 9 cents per share.  That's 12.5 percent higher than the average analyst prediction.  And it's a major departure from net loss of $43M USD a year before (calendar Q2 2010).

Counterintuitively, revenue was the complete opposite story.  AMD's revenue of $1.57B USD was short of the analyst prediction of $1.58B USD.  And it represents a 2 percent drop from calendar Q1 2011 and a 5 percent drop from a year ago.

In a way, this is good news as it shows strong evidence that AMD's cost cutting is working better than expected.  And there's more interesting news to be gleaned from the report as well.

II. Desktop, Server Revenue Falls, Fusion Saves

CPU revenue held largely flat at $1.21B USD (it actually fell just a few million, year to year), but that was only thanks to the best-selling "Fusion" advanced processing units, the Llano and Brazos series.  While AMD did not reveal an exact breakdown of sales of Fusion mobile chips, other mobile CPUs, desktop CPUs, and server CPUs it did comment that desktop and server sales were down.  While it would not say how much, it did say that the Fusion now accounted for 50 percent of its sales revenue on the mobile side.

The Fusion APUs [1][2][3] combine AMD's core designs with a low-end discrete GPU to produce a chip with decent x86 CPU performance and much better than usual "integrated" graphics performance.  Given the competitive price, customers have been embracing the product, which is perfect for budget laptops.

It's no big secret why AMD's desktop and server revenue took a hit.  AMD hasn't released a new core design since Phenom II, which first hit the market in December 2008.  And the last major architecture redesign was in 2003 with the release of the Athlon 64/Opteron (K8) processors.  That's set to change when AMD's Bulldozer core plows into town later this year.

Bulldozer is built on a 32 nm process.  Bulldozer's answer to rival Intel Corp.'s (INTC) single core + hyperthreading is a "module", which actually has two cores.  The result is more discrete resources, but not significantly more space on die, according to AMD.  Of course AMD has trailed Intel in CPU design and manufacturing processes over the past several years, so it remains to be seen in AMD can live up to its hype.  It should be noted that Bulldozer was expected for Q2 2011 and is behind schedule.

AMD's desktop and server revenue were further impacted by reduced chip prices.

III. GPU Sales Post Bigger Drop

More troubling, AMD's GPU revenue fell 17 from Q2 2010 and 11 percent from Q1 2011.  It appears rival NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA) is picking up stream with its GeForce 500 series, which aired in November 2010.  AMD also suffered from part shortages -- its high end Radeon HD 6990 GPU-- the most powerful single-slot solution on the market today -- has been virtually entirely out of stock since April.

NVIDIA is preparing its Kepler architecture (28 nm) for a Q4 2011 launch.  Products with Kepler chips will presumably be branded GeForce 6xx GPUs.  AMD has promised to release its own next generation CPUs Southern Islands (28 nm), in H2 2011, so it could presumably get the jump on its competitor.  Southern Islands will presumably be branded the Radeon 7xxx series.

Southern Islands, which contains both a die shrink and a new graphics core design, is currently in mass production, so AMD seems to be doing pretty good currently.

No one knows where AMD and NVIDIA currently sit in market share.  The best numbers on hand come from back in May, which put AMD at 40.5 percent of discrete GPU sales and NVIDIA at 59.6.  This is a reversal from 2010, when AMD briefly took the lead in sales from NVIDIA.

While AMD may now be back to playing catch up, discrete sales are only a part of the value equation of the GPU unit to AMD.  The great sales of Fusion are largely only thanks to AMD's GPU expertise, which it acquired when it purchased ATI Technologies.

IV. Leadership Questions Loom

Most of the earnings facts and figures seems pretty predictable to those who follow the company close, as does the near term outlook.  The only major question is one of leadership, with CEO Dirk Meyer's January ouster.  Mr. Meyer was reportedly dropped for failing to pursue emerging business like smart phones and tablets, aggressively enough.

Since the shake-up, Thomas Seifert, the company's chief financial officer, has been pulling double duty, also serving as the chief executive.  Meanwhile a hunt for a replacement has been carried out.

Mr. Seifert urged patience to investors, commenting, "[The] search for a new CEO remains a top priority. The board is pleased with the quality of the candidates interviewed and as confident in its robust and active process. Meeting a timeline is not the driving force in the search. Finding the right candidate is."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Atom down
By Gungel on 7/22/2011 9:53:42 AM , Rating: 3
Good to see Fusion taking of while Atom sales are dropping 15% in the same quarter.

RE: Atom down
By BSMonitor on 7/22/2011 1:10:27 PM , Rating: 2
Fusion is replacing the low-end for AMD, so of course the sales are "taking off". OEM's are only getting these in the low end now.

Fusion itself is not going bring the net book fad back to life. Tablets have killed its momentum.

RE: Atom down
By Samus on 7/22/2011 2:33:43 PM , Rating: 1
Netbooks are dead. Notbooks are alive and well.

Look at the Lenovo Thinkpad 120e or the HP DM1z, both selling well under $500 and pretty much all the ultra-portable power you'd need.

RE: Atom down
By Taft12 on 7/22/2011 2:39:34 PM , Rating: 2
Nice units, but little to no marketshare at all.

The E-350 brought netbook pricing (and performance) to 15" laptops. Kind of a dumb package, but those are being gobbled up thanks to the low price. Next quarter it'll be something different again I'm sure. Fickle public.

RE: Atom down
By shady28 on 7/24/2011 12:34:27 PM , Rating: 2
I think those 2 have a lot of market share - you see them quite a lot. The DM1Z at $450 gives a larger, higher res, screen and about twice the speed of a typical Atom based netbook. Especially for things that netbooks get used for - youtube, watching movies, Skype, flash games on FaceBook, etc - the E-350 really has no competition out there at all.

RE: Atom down
By Targon on 7/23/2011 4:37:01 PM , Rating: 2
The current Fusion designs are based on the current K10.5 CPU architecture, but once Fusion gets Bulldozer cores next year, we should see Fusion going into a higher tier as well. Another thing that Fusion is bringing, quad-core AMD laptops, and THOSE should sell a bit better.

RE: Atom down
By Kiffberet on 7/25/2011 8:24:53 AM , Rating: 2
.."quad-core AMD laptops, and THOSE should sell a bit better".

You sure about that?

I'd say the exact opposite.

Who's going to pay extra for a quad core processor to run Internet Explorer, Word or watch a video?

The majority of business users and the general population don't need all that power. They just want quick boot up and long battery life, which is where SSD's come into play.

"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki