backtop


Print 35 comment(s) - last by shompa.. on Jul 26 at 1:27 PM


"I LOVE THIS REPORT!!" -- Steve Ballmer  (Source: The Inquisitr)

RIM's PlayBook was beat out by Microsoft's offerings last quarter. This seems surprising, given that Microsoft doesn't even have a dedicated tablet offering system, instead relying on a clunky modified version of Windows 7.  (Source: Venture Beat)

Android's tablets increased in market share more than 10-fold in a year. The growth is closely paralleling Android's growth in the smart phone market, which would indicate that Android will be the clear cut market leader by next year.  (Source: Engadget)
RIM, meanwhile meets the numbers with disappointment

When it comes to tablets, Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) has seen little love.  Its fans have expressed an array of frustrations (Why doesn't Microsoft make Windows Phone 7 tablets today? Why no ARM support yet? Why did it kill the popular Courier project?).  Its critics write it off as a tired old hat that lacks the innovation necessary to succeed.  And market analysts have been perhaps the cruelest of all, battering Microsoft's stock and admonishing it in reports.

But the latest numbers from research firm Strategy Analytics show [press release] something surprising -- Microsoft finally appears to be improving its tablet position.

According to the researchers Microsoft picked up 4.6 percent of the global tablet market in calendar Q2 2011 -- up from a mere 1 percent or so of the market, a year ago.  In fact, Microsoft managed to beat struggling Canadian gadget maker Research In Motion Ltd. (TSE:RIM), whose much-anticipated Playbook tablet debuted in April to less than stellar reviews.  RIM gathered 3.3 percent of the market.

The fact that Microsoft beat RIM is particularly exciting for the company, as it did so without a dedicated tablet OS or support for ARM processors -- widely viewed as the best solution for the tablet space.  When Windows 8, an OS with a tablet-centric design, comes a-calling in 2012, packing ARM CPUs, one would imagine Microsoft could do very well.

On the other hand, RIM is left to contemplate its next move.  Clearly its new QNX operating system, while perhaps better than the previous Blackberry OS, isn't thrilling customers.

Apple, Inc. (AAPL), maker of the incredibly popular iPad experienced somewhat mixed news, as well.  While it is still seeing terrific growth in tablet unit sales, its market share shrunk year-to-year, dropping from 94.3 percent in Q2 2010 to 61.3 percent in the most recent quarter.

Tablet sales rose 331 percent, so Apple still did quite well.  But tablets sporting Google Inc.'s (GOOG) Android OS are eroding Apple's lead, with sales of Android designs jumping from 2.9 percent to 30 percent in a single year.  

The situation seems eerily reminiscent to Android's growth in the smart phone sector, where Android jumped from being a virtual bit player, to being a strong second, to being the clear-cut market leader, in a 2-year span.

Of course, it's possibly Android could see its market share momentum slow or even reverse, if Apple can succeed in convincing U.S. courts to ban its competitors' products from the market.  Apple is currently suing [1][2][3][4][5] the top three Android device makers, seeking injunctions to prevent them from selling product in the U.S., on the premise that Android OS "steal[s]" patented ideas from Apple.

If Apple's bid to kill Android with lawsuits falls short, though, it may find itself in second place within a year.  And with Microsoft looking poised to finally get serious about tablets in 2012, the Cupertino gadget maker is surely a bit concerned.

The market share numbers in the report were generated using collected sales figures, arguably the most accurate form of market share reporting.  The report is available for a cool $7,000.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Why me?
By DrApop on 7/21/2011 8:34:40 PM , Rating: 1
Why am I the only one who finds the big huge block/panel interface in Win8 the ugliest thing around?

I can't believe anyone wants this on a tablet let alone a new computer. Why would I want a nice big 24+ inch computer monitor sporting 4 or so huge panels of facebook, twitter, and email info as my opening page? Reminds me of the push technology from the 90's or something. I want a desktop with all my programs within easy reach...not buried on some other page or behind some highway sized panels.




RE: Why me?
By Fritzr on 7/22/2011 12:23:10 AM , Rating: 2
You do realize that with a real Windows OS you are allowed to customize the desktop.

One of the nicer features of Win8 will be the Win7 desktop for programs that do not play well with the tablet style interface.

Even if Win8 doesn't support Win7 style icons directly (which they would be crazy not to) you can simply use the Win7 desktop to access all your shiny new Win8 programs :)

That clunky screen you pooh pooh is for the 7" tablet crowd who already complain about icons that are too small to touch accurately. Remember the BIG feature of Win8 is that it will be for both small tablets and 50" desktops :D


RE: Why me?
By BZDTemp on 7/22/2011 4:02:42 AM , Rating: 2
You make it sound like the Win7 desktop is a nice place!

To me the Win7 desktop is like the Fisher-Price of OS GUI and as for customizing what Microsoft offers is appalling the only way to go is simply to replace the GUI as a whole. Why is it that MS still does not offer a big switch in their OS which lets you choose between eye-candy casual user and pure information/productivity professional :-(


RE: Why me?
By xdrol on 7/22/2011 7:05:10 AM , Rating: 4
Because it does?


RE: Why me?
By damianrobertjones on 7/22/2011 3:23:31 AM , Rating: 2
...because non-techie people don't think like you.


"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki