Print 70 comment(s) - last by jimhsu.. on Jul 27 at 3:56 PM

Concession would make fuel economy standards easier for large trucks  (Source: Dodge)
Concession would reduce the yearly increase rate for new standards for large trucks and SUVs to 3.5% per year

The Obama administration wants to significantly increase the CAFE standards that govern fleet wide fuel economy for automakers. The problem is that there is a huge amount of backlash from those in the automotive industry. The backlash is so far keeping the Obama administration and automakers from coming to an agreement on proposed fuel economy standards moving into the future.

The Obama administration has put a concession forward in an effort to woo the Big 3 automakers to agree to the economy standards. The concession would see the makers of big trucks and SUVs forced to move to the higher fuel economy standards at a much slower rate than makers of cars and light SUVs. Hopes are high that the agreement between the Obama administration and the Big 3 will be made by early next week. 

Washington wants the CAFE requirements to be set at 56 mpg by 2025. The concession would allow the Big 3 to adopt the CAFE standards for the larger, gas guzzling vehicles, at a rate of 3.5% per year rather than the 5% annual improvement rate that the Obama administration wants for light trucks, cars, and light SUVs.

CAFE standards are currently targeting 35.5 mpg fleet wide by 2016 and that number will grow to 56 mpg by 2025 under the proposed regulations. The final rules are hoped to be ready by September.

However, automakers outside the Big 3 are not happy at all about the proposed concession. Carmakers that do not produce large SUVs and trucks see the concessions as giving the Big 3 an unfair advantage. The companies feel that the concession would encourage consumers to buy less efficient vehicles. 

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Bigger is better
By FITCamaro on 7/15/2011 2:45:29 PM , Rating: 4
You realize that more women drive like to drive larger vehicles right? Because they feel safer and are usually the one with the kids.

RE: Bigger is better
By adiposity on 7/15/2011 2:59:53 PM , Rating: 2
Usually minivans and SUVs. I think he was talking about the trucks.

RE: Bigger is better
By kraeper on 7/15/2011 3:10:47 PM , Rating: 1
And more males like V8 sports cars. No exemption for us?

RE: Bigger is better
By dcollins on 7/20/2011 2:43:02 PM , Rating: 2
I hate when people buy bigger vehicles because they are "safer." It is such a misinformed, incredibly selfish thing to do. Larger, taller vehicles are more likely to roll over, more difficult to maneuver and stop and more deadly in accidents. The only reason they are safer is that the larger vehicle has a weight advantage in an accident with a smaller, lighter vehicle.

A 3,000lb car versus a 3,000lb car accident is much safer than a 5,000lb SUV versus a 5,000lb SUV. The SUV is only safer when it hits the smaller vehicle and only at the cost of significantly more damage to the smaller vehicle. SUV/Truck drivers put everyone else's lives in greater danger just so they can feel safe.

There are a lot of reasons to buy a truck, but safety is NOT one of them. Unless you have no concern for your fellow man I guess.

“Then they pop up and say ‘Hello, surprise! Give us your money or we will shut you down!' Screw them. Seriously, screw them. You can quote me on that.” -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng referencing patent trolls

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki