Print 22 comment(s) - last by Souka.. on Jul 15 at 2:12 PM

The fight against piracy enters a new phase, but no resolution in sight

Copyright groups and online file sharers are engaged in attrition warfare that has led to confusing government and ISP involvement.  The battle lines have been drawn, and internet users downloading and sharing files run the low risk of warnings and possible enforcement.

The United States government claims to have no interaction -- but supports the new six-strikes policy -- with the recently created Center for Copyright Infringement (CCI) effort between ISPs and copyright groups.  The partnership will offer a sort of copyright alert and reeducation program that has only led to confusion and uncertainty among file sharers.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) group published a short blog post that highlights some issues related to the controversial framework.

Governments in the European Union have tried to find different methods to attack piracy, but have had varying results.  Spanish file sharing sites brought to court for linking to copyrighted works recently scored a victory, which only proves the difficulty in punishing these sites.  Meanwhile, Italian ISPs are facing legal action after ignoring a ban against a torrent site.

France implemented a three-strikes system to possibly boot repeat offenders, and more than 18 million file sharers have been tracked.  However, budget and manpower issues have only led to 470,000 warnings issued to first-time copyright violators.  Just 20,000 letters were sent out as second warnings, and only 10 people are at risk of having a judge personally review their file sharing case.

The cat-and-mouse game between file sharers and copyright holders will continue for the rest of 2011, while very little is being done to reach a mutual agreement.  For example, the use of three-strikes laws have done very little to intimidate pirates to stop file sharing, while ISPs are criticized by subscribers and terrorized by copyright groups. 

Instead, BitTorrent and other peer-to-peer file sharers are getting better at masking their identities to prevent detection by watch groups.  However, the federal government has moved to domain seizures as a critical method to help fight Internet piracy, with the practice expected to accelerate.

Expect to see continued copyright group efforts against file sharers, while ISPs are also forced into turning over users rather than face court issues.  The federal government and the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have been recruited to lend an effective hand against pirates.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Stupid
By BZDTemp on 7/14/2011 3:46:55 PM , Rating: 0
Steam is better than nothing but Steam still sucks.

Here is why:

1. The single player games that require you to be online when playing.
2. The fact that prices are not global. Of course local taxes must be handled but there is no excuse for 1$=1€=1£ that is just wrong.
3. Better protection for user needs to be in place. What happens when Steam dies some day or decide some games have gotten to old to support.
4. Steam does not let me resell games in a simple manner.

RE: Stupid
By ShaolinSoccer on 7/14/2011 4:10:32 PM , Rating: 4
Steam is AWESOME! I can play "most" single player games offline. I buy all my games for less than $5 including the top rated games of all time. It keeps all my games updated automatically. They even let me play old games like XCOM without downloading anything extra! I just run the game from the list and it actually plays! If I'm the only person who loves Steam then screw you guys, I'm going home! >>>

RE: Stupid
By fredgiblet on 7/14/2011 8:27:20 PM , Rating: 3
I like Steam except for the part where I have to download large games over my crappy internet connection.

RE: Stupid
By Souka on 7/15/2011 2:12:40 PM , Rating: 2
other thing I dont like steam is the app is tied to my account... can't sell or trade in game toward another one.

eg... I sold my Crysis DVD games at nearly 1/2 orginal cost on eBay...then again, that was single-player stuff.

RE: Stupid
By slickr on 7/14/2011 11:08:01 PM , Rating: 4
If they want to crackdown on sharing than they need to arrest more than 1 billion people in the world and let me tell you that is impossible.

But this is more than a file sharing problem, its a fight for ideas information. I download everything, every piece of music, games, movies has been downloaded from p2p, bittorrent and file sharing websites.

Would I buy any of these? Yes, but its impossible to buy everything you download, so they need to stop count every download on the internet as $10.000 in loss.

And ever since the radio the sales of music have gone up, then came the TV and sales went up for music again, then came the tape and sales went up, than came the PC and CD format and sales went up, all the time while these music and movie companies cried foul their profits have been record braking and then came the internet and all records of profits have been broken, music, movies and games industry is the biggest its ever been in the whole history, so they know it has actually helped them, but are such evil corporate titans, with love for only money that they are going to go after 5yr kids and 90yo grannies for filesharing.

So these mega corporations having record braking profits since the internet boom should not fuck with their consumers or else. And its not like the quality of music has gone up with Biebers, britneys and gaga's stealing from techno, electro and house music genres because they lack any creativity of their own.

Long live techno, dance, house, trance, electro and other free music.

RE: Stupid
By fredgiblet on 7/14/2011 8:54:38 PM , Rating: 2
1. This should only be a problem if you're on dial-up, and you CAN play them offline.

2. This is true of everything, why should it be different for Steam?

3. A somewhat valid concern, but realistically Steam is likely to be around for a long time and if there was an issue that threatened it's existence there is likely a plan in place to remove the Steam requirement.

As for games getting too old again there's no difference from any other situation, if I try to play System Shock 1 on my current computer it won't work, period. Steam at least makes a lot of games functional on current systems, if they develop issues later, well I only paid $5 for the old games so I can't really complain.

4. True, and a valid reason not to buy brand-new games on Steam though older games whose resale value is minimal aren't really affected by it.

"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki