backtop


Print 86 comment(s) - last by ekv.. on Jul 18 at 10:50 PM


Rupert Murdoch's employees are accused by the UK government of hacking into the phones of murder victims, terrorist victims, family members of dead soldiers, politicians, and celebrities.  (Source: AP Photo)

In response to the scandal Mr. Murdoch's son announced that "News of the World" will close, printing its last issue Sunday. The tabloid is the biggest in the UK in terms of circulation, so the news came as a shock to many.  (Source: Bloomberg)

News Corp. owns multiple U.S. publications, including the tabloid "New York Post" and Fox News
News Corp. employees hacked into a variety of peoples' phones, including murdered children

When you get caught hacking into the phone of a murdered child and hinder the investigation, you know you're in deep trouble.  That's the position that embattled international news agency News Corp. find itself in.

News Corp. (
NWS), the brainchild of billionaire media mogul Rupert Murdoch, has a penchant for controversy; with properties like U.S. news network Fox News.  However, such controversy pales in comparison to allegations brought against News of the World which is published by News International, one of News Corp.'s British holdings.

According to documents released in an ongoing police investigation, News Corp.'s British properties hired veteran hackers to gain access to the voicemail accounts of persons of interest -- including murder victims, terrorism victims, families of dead soldiers, celebrities, and politicians.  The hackers often altered the voicemail contents in an effort to fish for leads.

Just a few days ago the talk centered on whether News International CEO and Murdoch-protégé Rebekah Brooks would resign.  Now that talk has been made a moot point, as Mr. Murdoch has decided that he will discontinue the entire News of the World publication.

The news shocked many, as News of the World is currently London's best-selling tabloid newspaper.  Many in England believe that the paper's articles make or break political candidates.

The news that the paper was dead was delivered by Rupert Murdoch's son, James Murdoch, a senior News Corp. executive.  He comments, "The News of the World is in the business of holding others to account, but it failed when it came to itself."

He revealed that the move would lead to 200 staffers losing their jobs, though they could apply for other News Corp. positions.  He also revealed that the proceeds of this Sunday's final edition would be donated to charity, in an effort to placate the growing firestorm of criticism.

The closure of the embattled publication may not be enough to silence the public outcry; particularly when pressing questions remain.  Questions include whether News of the World staffers broke British law during their actions and whether they shared their findings with other sister publications, such as The Times of London and the tabloid Sun.  If they did, these publications could find themselves subject to similar boycotts as News of the World.

Another compelling question is whether the questionable tactics were isolated to News Corp.'s British operations, or whether they could have been employed at American tabloids such as the New York Post.  Thus far there's no evidence of this, but the topic will certainly be examined as spotlight of scrutiny is cast onto News Corp.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: What's the problem?
By BZDTemp on 7/8/2011 8:27:10 AM , Rating: 3
Are you kidding. Have you even read what the whole thing is about.

Are you seriously okay with reporters listening in on private conversations not to mention deleting peoples voice mails?

And if you're okay with some random people doing shit like that then where do you draw the line?

Take the case where the people for the newspaper deleted voice messages on a missing teenagers account. The newspaper did so because they wanted more messages to be left so they had something to write about. The result was the police and parents got to thinking the girl might be alive since messages was being deleted. Imagine it one of your loved ones missing.

The newspaper has been exposed as doing phone hacking and the like for almost a decade - it's simply a way of doing business for them. Besides it's not like the newspaper is being shut down it is the owner that is closing it to try and save face plus the paper has lost most of it's advertisers.


RE: What's the problem?
By wordsworm on 7/8/2011 11:07:19 AM , Rating: 2
I did say they went too far. I also said that police go too far. Why hold the media to higher standard than the police, was my question. Is that easy enough for you to understand?


RE: What's the problem?
By BZDTemp on 7/9/2011 4:28:13 AM , Rating: 2
Well, I'm sorry but apart from that question you also made this statement:

quote:
It's not a good reason to shut down an entire company over issues with a few overzealous reporters and/or managers.


It may be you were on about police and the media but it looked to me like you ended up answering that question yourself. Essentially making it to be that what the Newspaper did was not so bad.

Since this page is about "News of the World" and I know nothing about the Police thing you mentioned I followed you up on the statement about media.


RE: What's the problem?
By wordsworm on 7/9/2011 7:54:42 PM , Rating: 2
I was saying that it's no worse than what police do. Investigative journalists are supposed to push the boundaries in order to discover the truth behind things. It's sad when people get hurt. Maybe a few of the journalists should lose their licenses. That's as far as I think it ought to go.

A newspaper is just a body of individuals. Not all of the individuals participated in the acts that are up for debate. Why punish an entire organization, hundreds of people, for the acts of a few? As I said before, it would be like shutting down a police department because one officer went too far.


RE: What's the problem?
By Reclaimer77 on 7/9/2011 9:43:14 PM , Rating: 3
*froths at mouth* Because uhhh Murdock is rich!! And Fox sucks!! And ummm we don't like them bla bla bla rabble rabble rabble!!!


RE: What's the problem?
By YashBudini on 7/9/2011 10:39:41 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Why punish an entire organization, hundreds of people, for the acts of a few?

Nobody forced him to close it, it was his calculated decision, a simplistic way of stating R77 is once again fiercy battling windmills. That's what happens when you don't have a leg to stand on.

As mantioned earlier, traditional paper sales are down all over. Those that advertised in this paper will now simply advertise in his other papers. Add to that the other papers will probably show a slight increase in circulation, if not more, so they could in fact charge more for advertising, the basis of the business.

quote:
Not all of the individuals participated in the acts that are up for debate. Why punish an entire organization, hundreds of people, for the acts of a few?

What? They don't have conspiracy laws over there?
http://criminal.findlaw.com/crimes/a-z/conspiracy....


RE: What's the problem?
By YashBudini on 7/9/2011 11:17:29 PM , Rating: 2
@Wordsworm

Ever hear of vicarious liability?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability_(...


"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine." -- Bill Gates














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki