backtop


Print 29 comment(s) - last by delphinus100.. on Jul 6 at 10:26 PM


Mars rover Curiosity  (Source: regmedia.co.uk)
Curiosity is expected to launch from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida on November 25, 2011, and will land on Mars in August 2012. The decision regarding its landing site is expected to be made this month

After recently retiring Mars rover Spirit, NASA is introducing a new Mars probe called Curiosity. While the rover is expected to launch later this year, one critical question remains unanswered: where will it land?

NASA rover Curiosity is a $2.5 billion, nuclear-powered machine that is the size of a Mini Cooper, and is four times as heavy as Spirit and Opportunity. Curiosity contains a laser that can vaporize rocks at seven meters, a percussive drill, a large robot arm and a weather station. In addition, it has 4.8kg of plutonium-238.

Curiosity's main mission on Mars is to find organic compounds as a "telltale sign" that life have existed on Mars. The problem is that scientist's must decide on a landing area that will most likely contain such evidence.

So far, scientist's have narrowed the choices down to four options: Eberswalde Crater, Mawrth Vallis, Gale Crater and Holden Crater.

"Each site has things that make it good and things that make it not quite so good," said planetary scientist Matt Golombek of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. "It's kind of hard to select because it boils down to which kind of science is important to you, and that's almost personal."

Eberswalde Crater contains a delta, which is believed to be a buildup of sediment left by flowing water. This could be advantageous in finding preserved organics and biosignatures. However, these deposits could be just clay-dusted rocks, and if that's the case, the entire mission would be a waste of time. But Golombek notes that this particular crater has the highest chance of finding organics.

Mawrth Vallis has exposed valley walls that are almost as old as the planet at 3.7 billion years old. These walls contain a lot of Martian history, and are stacked hundreds of meters thick with exposed clays called phyllosilicates, which form in the presence of water, as well as sedimentary rocks. But the problem with this landing area is that scientist's do not know how it formed, and that the water may have been to acidic to support life.

Gale Crater features a mound of debris that is 3 miles above the crater floor, and contains layered deposits of sulfates and clays. This site is particularly interesting because its the only one that has both materials (sulfates and clays). But again, scientist's don't know how it formed.

Holden Crater is a 93-mile wide crater with gullies, which "tail off" into deposits that were covered in water at one time. In addition, the crater has many ancient rocks called breccia, which have fallen, broken and cemented together by landslides, meteor impact or floods.

While the landing site is still undecided, what scientist's do know is that the rover will land within a 12.4-by-15.5 mile targeted area, which is a very precise touchdown that could not be accomplished before, hence, certain sites couldn't be accomplished before. Curiosity will be able to achieve what other rovers couldn't between its precise landing technique and the use of 10 science instruments that will allow it to detect any organics present.

Curiosity is expected to launch from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida on November 25, 2011, and will land on Mars in August 2012. The decision regarding its landing site is expected to be made this month.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Life on Mars
By BSMonitor on 7/5/2011 1:58:26 PM , Rating: 2
Bacteria.

There is sunlight, moisture although very small amounts, Oxygen, CO2.. What else would the bacteria that survive the trip need from Mars to thrive? We see on Earth all kinds of different forms of bacteria living in the harshest climates.

For something like this, seems like they would want to be absolutely careful not to transport alien bacteria to Mars, until it is certain no life exists there now. My point is, no one makes mention of this. Perhaps compartments of the landing capsule aren't sterile. Parts of the rover that are not directly related to experiments.

We may not be certain how difficult or easy it is for life to spring up. But for certain, life here flourishes quickly given the opportunity.

Almost certainly there are bacteria living/dormant on the remaining pieces of the Apollo equipment left on the moon.


RE: Life on Mars
By theapparition on 7/5/2011 2:15:48 PM , Rating: 2
Not sure why you were rated down in your original comment. But to answer your question, an absolute yes. Nasa is very concerned about contamination and has effectively sterilized the craft. Typical articles don't go towards that level of detail, but it is a major concern and one addressed by Nasa.


RE: Life on Mars
By Reclaimer77 on 7/5/2011 6:32:30 PM , Rating: 3
Cross contamination policies in NASA started in 1967. The Viking missions were in the 70's. Interesting discussion, but I believe we can be reasonably assured we didn't put life on Mars in the form of microbes. And while much more heartier bacteria has been found on Earth, I don't see how the more common ones that would be present in a NASA lab or launchpad could possibly have survived the trip through Mars's atmosphere.


"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki