Print 79 comment(s) - last by EricMartello.. on Jul 6 at 10:48 PM

TDL-4 detects and disables other malware to hide itself

Over the last year, there have been a number of high profile takedowns of botnets. These takedowns lead to a significant reduction in the amount of spam that computer users see in their inbox.

Security researchers are talking about a new botnet called TDL-4 and they say that it is virtually indestructible. The designers of the botnet used some ingenious methods to ensure that their net isn't as easy to take offline as previous botnets.

Security researcher Sergey Golovanod from Kapersky Labs said in a report on the TDL-4 botnet, "[TDL-4 is] the most sophisticated threat today." Joe Stewart is a malware researcher at Dell SecureWorks, he said, "I wouldn't say it's [TDL-4] perfectly indestructible, but it is pretty much indestructible. It does a very good job of maintaining itself."

There are several factors that work together to make TDL-4 so robust. One of the factors is that the malware infects the master boot record of the computers HDD it resides on. This is the first sector of the hard drive read when a computer starts and the malware rootkit is installed there. That makes the rootkit invisible to security software and the OS.

The thing that makes the botnet even more robust is the method that it uses to communicate with infected computers from the command and control servers. The TDL-4 botnet uses a public peer-to-peer network called the Kad P2P network for one of the two channels it uses to communicate between infected machines and the C&C servers.

Kapersky researcher Roek Schouwenberg wrote in an email to Computerworld, "The way peer-to-peer is used for TDL-4 will make it extremely hard to take down this botnet. The TDL guys are doing their utmost not to become the next gang to lose their botnet."

The hackers behind the botnet also use their own encryption algorithm and use the domain names of the C&C servers as the encryption keys. The use of a public network is the key to the robust botnet and helps ensure the TDL-4 network remains online.

Schouwenberg said, "Any attempt to take down the regular C&Cs can effectively be circumvented by the TDL group by updating the list of C&Cs through the P2P network. The fact that TDL has two separate channels for communications will make any take-down very, very tough."

So far, the TDL-4 botnet is very effective with an estimated 4.5 million Windows computers currently infected. Stewart said, "The 4.5 million is not surprising at all. It [TDL-4] might not have as high an infection rate as other botnets, but its longevity means that as long as they can keep infecting computers and the discovery rate is small, they'll keep growing it."

Another key to the longevity of the TDL-4 malware is the fact that it finds and disables other malware on the computer. This is done because the less likely the user is to know of any infection on their computer, the less likely they are to investigate further and potentially discover the TDL-4 malware on the machine.

Golovanov said, "TDL-4 doesn't delete itself following installation of other malware. At any time [it] can ... delete malware it has downloaded."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Invisible?
By bah12 on 7/1/2011 9:56:47 AM , Rating: 2
My point was that if this was invisible to the OS (and thus anything running within the OS), then why is there a GUI tool already available that can see it and remove it. Invisible means, can't be seen. I'd expect the removal process to involve getting out of the OS if it were truly "invisible". Clearly the tool can see it, so the OS could as well, doesn't mean it does just that it could.

This paragraph read to me that the virus was hard if not impossible to remove. That simply is not the case.

RE: Invisible?
By Smilin on 7/1/2011 10:50:32 AM , Rating: 2
I explained this in my post above.

There are many ways to see masked rootkits and the good ones will prevent most of these. Hiding from antivirus is really easy once an infection is in place. Hiding from a tool dedicated to finding that particular malware would be difficult if not impossible.

For example (again): Stick a lowerfilter driver in to map sector 0 reads to another sector. You're screwed... nothing reading from the disk driver would be able to see the real sector. BUT..someone could always stick yet another filter driver under the first.

Impossible to remove? No. It's just going to take a bit more capability than is built into antivirus by default. A "cleaning tool" would be necessary (until the AV is updated).

Mind you, removing a rootkit from a machine is not the same thing as removing a botnet from the 'net. This particular one can't be disabled en-mass like some in the past.

RE: Invisible?
By ekv on 7/4/2011 2:37:38 AM , Rating: 2
This particular one can't be disabled en-mass like some in the past.
However, that gives me an idea. I shall require vast sums of research money in order to capture the botnet in toto.

And so it goes. Interesting game of cat-and-mouse, and I damn well intend to keep my computer clean. 8)

"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki