backtop


Print 36 comment(s) - last by lexluthermiest.. on Jul 2 at 10:29 PM


Satoru Iwata with the Wii U controller  (Source: zeldainformer.com)
Investors and analysts are unsure if it can stand up to the challenge after the disappointing E3 presentation

Growing up, most gamers became accustomed to playing their video games with a physical controller while sitting in front of the television. This was generally the status quo up until 2006, when Nintendo released Wii and changed the way we play. While the Wii got gamers off the couch, it wasn't widely accepted by core gamers because it didn't suit their traditional gaming experience.

But Nintendo president and CEO Satoru Iwata explained to investors that the Wii U would be different. He said that core gamers would accept the Wii U because it can be played in a conventional way, and because it has high definition visuals. 

"Wii was not accepted by core gamers because they did not want to abandon their preferred control approach," said Iwata. "Additionally, Wii did not use HD because HD cost performance at the time was low. Wii U makes it easier to use conventional controls. Also, the Wii U controller is not as big or heavy as it looks."

But investors and analysts alike are just as unsure about the Wii U. Many questioned Nintendo's tactics at E3 when it featured more demos about the hardware rather than the games it would launch, which led many to believe that the Wii U would have a poor line-up of games when it came to launch time. 

But Iwata noted that "Zelda HD" would be released for the Wii U only, in hopes of attracting longtime "Zelda" fans as well as those interested in increased HD adoption. 

"Regarding 'Zelda HD,' Japanese developers said that it could not be replicated on other machines," said Iwata. 

Iwata added that several Wii U reactions around the world were positive, including those from Los Angeles and overseas media. He also mentioned that those who actually played the Wii U had a different reaction from those who just covered it online.

"There were high expectations from the new version of the Wii and this fell far short," said analyst Yusuke Tsunoda. "People had expected to see something more at a big event like the E3, but there wasn't really anything more than what's already reported."

Nintendo's share price fell to its lowest value in five years "following the unveiling of the Wii U." 

The Wii U is expected to be released sometime after April 2012.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I am interested but
By Da W on 6/30/2011 11:41:04 AM , Rating: 1
How short-sighted you are.
Angry brid style games are popular on tablets because of the low hardware tablets have. This Wii-U doesn't have any CPU-GPU inside the tablet, it all streams from a console 3 times more powerful than the current Xbox and PS3.

This things opens up new way to play on a console. Think civilization-warcraft style games controled with the touch screen. Think Madden 2012 with your playbook kept secret on your controler. Think many new things.

Besides for shooters, there#'s only one way to play thoses, and its with a mouse and keyboard on a descent PC. Screw the Xbox and its damn controler. I laught at people who tell me Crysis 2 on the xbox 360 has killer graphics. hahahaha. Try it on PC stupid!

On a side note, Wii-U is precisely what i hoped Microsoft would come up with Windows 8 and tablets and next Xbox device.


RE: I am interested but
By OnyxNite on 6/30/2011 12:28:29 PM , Rating: 3
Where do you get that's it's 3 times more powerful than the current Xbox360 and PS3? source?

What I've heard is that it has Radeon 4000 based graphics which IS faster than both the Xbox360 and PS3 but by about 1.5x not 3. Typically next-gen consoles have several times the power of their prior gen competitors and that doesn't seem to be the case here. Additionally typically a new console release is about equal to if not better then current PC graphics hardware but in the case of the Wii U the Radeon 4000 is an outdated graphics card NOW and the system won't actually launch until next year.

This APPEARS to be just a REALLY late entry to the current gen of consoles. I'm sure it will get a lot of support because it will be easy enough to add it to any PS3/Xbox360 cross-platform development but I doubt there will be many third party developers that really push the system with Wii U Exclusives. In other words if you already own a Xbox360 or PS3 there's not much point in getting this. If you only own a Wii however and want to step up to HD and start playing the 3rd party games you've been left out of then this is your machine.

The Wii was similarly weak hardware however and it dominated because of the new control scheme so it really just depends on if the new controller with a screen can repeat that. I won't be buying one though but I don't own a Wii either so I'm not really their target.


RE: I am interested but
By Da W on 6/30/11, Rating: -1
RE: I am interested but
By someguy123 on 6/30/2011 4:52:41 PM , Rating: 2
what...the RSX is based off the 7800. The ps3's capabilities is a mixture of the cell's FLOP ability as well as the GPU, which is what makes it technically faster than the 360 even with a weaker GPU. The 360's xenos is based off the X1900.

If it does have a 4870 it'll be about twice as fast as current consoles, but I've yet to see any developer report that it's really that significant of hardware boost, which leads me to believe it's more likely a lower end variant and not something comparable with the 4870.


RE: I am interested but
By nikon133 on 6/30/2011 6:00:40 PM , Rating: 2
I've seen info mentioning ATI 4000 series GPU, but at present it is only presumed it will be based on 4870. It can just as well end up with slower 4000 part. Consider that they were using X360 hardware to demo Wii U - based on that I would expect that Wii U will not provide significantly better visuals. If it could, I'd expect them to demo it on beefed up PC. It is hardly a favour demoing unit on much inferior hardware.


RE: I am interested but
By nikon133 on 6/30/2011 5:53:14 PM , Rating: 2
Actually PS3 graphics are based on GTX 7800. X360 graphics are based on Radeon 1800 or 1900 and as such are actually more advanced than PS3 graphics. Additionally, X360 has an extra AA chip which is smoothing visuals without performance impact.

PS3 saving grace might be in it's Cell processor which, with 7 (6 available to games) vector processors, can offload graphics card to some extend... but requires some very smart and advanced programming. It does show in games like Uncharted and Killzone.

Regarding Wii U, details for both CPU and GPU, as well as amount of RAM and video RAM, are still unclear. Yes I would expect that device will better current consoles, but to which extend?


RE: I am interested but
By Mitch101 on 6/30/2011 3:43:04 PM , Rating: 2
So its like copying my Windows Phone 7 interfacing into my X-Box 360 w/kinect where you can use the screen on your phone to control the game in some respect.
http://newxbox360blog.com/featured/windows-phone-7...


RE: I am interested but
By someguy123 on 6/30/2011 4:58:09 PM , Rating: 1
Yes?

Not sure where fanboyism will get you. You're posting a device designed specifically because of the wii's motion controls, after trying to scoff at the tablet trend.

All these companies take things from each other, though I doubt nintendo took the idea for the wii u from microsoft in February. I'd avoid the wii U if they don't make good games for it, not because of some blind hatred for tablets or inane love for "hardcore" consoles.


"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007

Did You Partake in "Black Friday/Thursday"?
Did You Partake in "Black Friday/Thursday"? 





0 Comments












botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki