Print 77 comment(s) - last by jabber.. on Jul 11 at 6:00 AM

Reviews generally concluded that Llano provides budget shoppers unparalleled bang for their buck.  (Source: Anandtech)

Llano packs a mean GPU punch, besting Intel's comparable core by as much as 4x times the framerates in some games  (Source: Anandtech)

A Llano rig retails for about $350, and offers solid overclockability.  (Source: Tweak Town)
While not as strong in CPU performance and memory, most reviews conclude AMD gives a better overall performance

With the hard launch of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s (AMD) Llano processor lineup, branded the "A Series", the first reviews are trickling in about what it's like to use a Fusion desktop.  Many DailyTech readers expressed skepticism about the platforms' prospects on desktops, but they might be a little surprised by what the reviewers said -- here's a hint; it all comes back to AMD pricing its products aggressively.

I. Priced to Kill

Many of the reviews compared the AMD A75 platform (with a Llano A8 CPU), codenamed Lynx, to the Intel Z68 platform (with a Sandy Bridge Core i3 CPU).  Price-wise AMD is about $15 cheaper, which may not seem like much, but at a total platform cost of $355 USD and $370, respectively, it's just enough to give AMD a psychological edge.

Most of the price difference comes from the motherboard -- a Gigabyte GA-A75M-UD4H, compatible with A8 processors, retails for $130 USD, while the Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3-B3, compatible with Sandy Bridge, costs another $10 of your cash.

Likewise an A8-3850 "Advanced Processing Unit" (system-on-a-chip), will cost you $5 USD less than a Core i3-2105 system-on-a-chip (SoC).

II. Performance

A Legit Reviews article offered generally kind words for the platform, stating:
The Lynx platform by AMD should do well with mainstream consumers that want a system that does everything they want it to do and without sucking down a bunch of power or draining their wallet.

The article shows that Intel has a lead on power consumption (not as much of an issue with a desktop) and on certain CPU specific benchmarks (like "HyperPi").  However, AMD delivered nearly twice the framerates in most games and was slightly faster in most video encoding benchmarks.  With many modern photo-editing software products, such as Adobe Systems Inc.'s (ADBE) Photoshop, relying heavily on the GPU that means that the AMD chip will likely come out ahead here, as well.

A PureOC piece offers more of the same, showing the DirectX 11 capable AMD chip pulling decent framerates in modern games, such as Tom Clancy's H.A.W.X. 2, Aliens vs. Predator, and S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Call of Pripyat.

The piece offers some insight in its overclockability, which they find to be around 30 percent on a stock air cooler.  They write:
The multiplier is locked on the A8-3850 and the only way to overclock is by the reference clock known by most as the FSB or AMD users HTT. The reference clock starts at 100 and there is no hypertransport, northbridge frequency to deal with in the bios. The reference clock however raises the APU frequency and the memory frequency which does have a multiplier. We raised the voltages to 1.52V and achieved a overclock of 3.712Ghz just shy of a 30% overclock.

PC Perspective's Ryan Shrout does offer some criticism of the CPU core performance, writing:

The problem really lies with the 2.9 GHz clock speed that the top end A8-3850 is tagged with, well below the speed of the most recent quad-core Phenom II parts from AMD that reached as high as 3.7 GHz. Because of the combination of a new 32nm process technology and that Llano is the first "true" Fusion part with standard CPU and GPU technology, AMD obviously had more problems getting this part to the speeds it wanted. Quite simply they ran out of time even after several delays and HAD to get something out into the market for OEMs to dabble in.

But, he adds that the integrated GPU does offer 2 to 4 times the performance of Intel's iGPU when gaming.

Anandtech found Anand Lal Shimpi took the platform out for a spin as well.  He came away very much a fan of the platform for budget buyers, writing:

If you're building an entry level gaming PC and have to rely solely on integrated graphics, it's clear that Llano is the only solution on the market today. You easily get 2x the frame rates of Intel's Core i3-2105 and can use that extra headroom to increase resolution, quality or sometimes both. The performance advantage is just one aspect of what Llano offers in this department. You do also get better overall game compatibility, DX11 and GPU compute support although the latter is still missing that killer app.

OverClockers Club also delivers a similar favorable review, writing:

All in all, I was pretty pleased with the AMD A8-3850. While not a game changer for the overclocker, it was not designed to fit this purpose. It was developed to bring strong video playback and decent mainstream gaming for a minimal cash outlay and it does just that. If you are looking for a second processor (without breaking the bank) for an HTPC, workstation or maybe that build for a special loved one, then the A-Series may just be what you are looking for.

TweakTown was gushing as well, applauding:

AMD really seem to have their fingers on the pulse of the mass market, though; they look to have developed an exceptional platform that sets a new segment, because it's leaps and bounds ahead of the competition. Atom from Intel is great, but it's a bit long in the tooth these days and is really beginning to age. The i3 2120 is a fantastic processor for the money and stock for stock it looks great. With such limited overclocking potential on the non "k" series Sandy Bridge CPUs, though, the stock performance you get is pretty much all you're going to get.

III. Conclusions

The "A Series" is suited for a very specific customers -- one that there happens to be a lot of of -- budget buyers who still might want to do the occasional HD video watching, photo edit, or fire up a game.  Given the fact that buyers of gaming rigs are in the minority, AMD is overall showing its ability to cater to the masses.

The Llano desktop comes at a sweet price of $350 USD, though OEMs may inflate that slightly.  It offers much better (2-4x) gaming performance than similarly priced Sandy Bridge desktops.  And it offers superior performance in apps that support GPU computing -- such as Photoshop or Microsoft Office 2010.  

About the only things Llano isn't the winner at are pure CPU performance and memory access times -- neither of which would make much of a difference to the average user.

And though few customers will probably ever try it, Llano even overclocks better than the similarly-priced low-end Sandy Bridge Core i3s.

AMD clearly seems to have Intel beat this time around.  First on the notebook and then on the desktop, AMD has beat Intel in mainstream performance.  It's not flashy, and it's no performance champ Sandy Bridge Core i7, but Fusion continues to show its potential for huge sales.  Intel should be very, very concerned.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Decade Ago
By dsx724 on 6/30/2011 3:35:47 PM , Rating: 2
AMD should have done this a decade ago.

RE: Decade Ago
By fredgiblet on 6/30/2011 3:44:59 PM , Rating: 2
A decade ago it was impossible.

RE: Decade Ago
By stm1185 on 6/30/2011 3:49:10 PM , Rating: 4
A decade ago they were beating Intel on cpu speed.

RE: Decade Ago
By quiksilvr on 6/30/2011 3:52:22 PM , Rating: 5
A decade ago was when I realized 2001: A Space Odyssey was a lie.

RE: Decade Ago
By Mitch101 on 6/30/2011 4:19:03 PM , Rating: 5
A decade ago they didnt own a graphics company.

RE: Decade Ago
By Rage187 on 6/30/11, Rating: -1
RE: Decade Ago
By Mitch101 on 6/30/2011 4:40:00 PM , Rating: 4
Last time I laughed at a in Russia joke I fell off my dinosaur. LOL thats a knee slapper.

RE: Decade Ago
By JediJeb on 7/1/2011 9:44:05 AM , Rating: 2
Chuck Norris killed all the Russians so there is nothing to laugh at anymore.

RE: Decade Ago
By Eugenian on 7/1/2011 10:00:27 PM , Rating: 1
In Soviet Russia, jokes laughed at you.

RE: Decade Ago
By Taft12 on 6/30/2011 4:10:10 PM , Rating: 5
This is the fruit of the ATI acquisition.

It's taken a few years to bear, but it is a sweet sweet fruit indeed!

RE: Decade Ago
By ekv on 6/30/2011 10:56:25 PM , Rating: 2
So could somebody tell me why they got rid of Dirk Meyers?

RE: Decade Ago
By Samus on 7/1/11, Rating: 0
RE: Decade Ago
By ekv on 7/1/2011 3:32:53 AM , Rating: 2
Right. You're looking at his results. And for the record, AMD's board has their head up their proverbial you-know-what, since they'd rather have a more "mobile"-focused line-up thereby conceding top-end CPU performance to Intel. Not what Dirk had in mind, competitive engineer that he is.

Dirk didn't take over for Hector Ruiz (aka "ruiNz") until Aug. 2008, so that's a mere 2 1/2 years to turn things around. And frankly, ATI is not the problem since they've basically kept AMD afloat. Given the process technology and cash-flow problems, Dirk did a decent job. Especially considering what AMD is now delivering.

RE: Decade Ago
By fteoath64 on 7/1/2011 5:19:19 AM , Rating: 2
The Board was greedy (so whats new here), they wanted to expand the X86 market AND capture a large slice of mobile market. AMD has not got the resources to do both so they did the sure-thing : APU. Now we are getting the fruits of their labor.
I would love to see a Mobile Radeon to counter the Tegra, PVR and Adreno chips. Superb encoding/decoding of 3D video on mobile would need AMD's expertise.

RE: Decade Ago
By GaMEChld on 7/1/2011 2:00:06 AM , Rating: 2
Negative, this is not the fruit, this is no more than the first bud. I think the next iteration will be doubly impressive. Once they've really cleaned up the implementation regarding memory bandwidth to the GPU, replace the STARS cores with Bulldozer cores, and sort out the clockspeed situation... it will be disgusting. And then later on at 28nm? Jeebus!

Interesting times, eh?

RE: Decade Ago
By Gondor on 7/1/2011 5:59:22 AM , Rating: 2
Is Trinity or whatever comes after it even planned for 28nm or just 22nm ? I was under the impression that it is only Brazos's successor that will get 28nm treatment (from 40nm of today) while more powerful Llano successors will go the 32nm -> 22nm route.

RE: Decade Ago
By GaMEChld on 7/1/2011 10:16:47 PM , Rating: 2
Ah you are correct, Ontario/Zacate successors Krishna/Wichita (2core/4core) will be at 28nm. Trinity (Bulldozer based Llano successor) will be at the same 32nm as Llano and Zambezi. Komodo will be the Zambezi successor, and I am unsure what fabrication process it will use. I hope they can make the jump to 22nm by then (2012).

RE: Decade Ago
By hanmen on 7/8/2011 2:42:43 AM , Rating: 2
welcome to our online store site:
looking forward to your visiting,hope to meet your need all cheap but good quality,best

sevice ,free shipping.
welcome to our online store site:
looking forward to your visiting,hope to meet your need all cheap but good quality,best

sevice ,free shipping.

"Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town." -- Charlie Miller

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki