backtop


Print 92 comment(s) - last by The Raven.. on Jul 1 at 4:03 PM


LulzSec's latest target is the Arizona police, which it mocked with Spanish profanity after hacking.  (Source: LulzSec)

LulzSec says the hack was in response to a recent anti-illegal immigrant act, which many say amounts to legislating racial profiling. The bill also implements warrantless arrests of individuals who may be U.S. citizens.  (Source: FlagDailyPhoto)

Even after attacks on the U.S. Senate, CIA, an FBI affiliate, UK law enforcement, and now the Ariz. police, international officials seem no closer to catching LulzSec. The group is a splinter faction of the larger hacking collective Anonymous, and formed shortly after its key members hacked HBGary in Feb. 2011.  (Source: Barbara Ling)
Emails, passwords, confidential documents, and more are all stolen from the state of Arizona

LulzSec appears to be taking its promise to hack international governments and banking institutions -- dubbed "op antisec" -- seriously.  The group on Thursday published a treasure trove of information, purloined from Arizona police department servers.

I. Police are Helpless to Stop LulzSec

The group entitled the release "Chinga La Migra", which is Spanish for "F**k the border patrol", according to slang site UrbanDicitionary.

LulzSec appears to have penetrated deeply into servers of at least one Arizona police department, stealing 708 files, which range from training manuals, to internal documents detailing arrests and more.

The documents were posted to popular torrent tracking site The Pirate Bay, with a description that included an ASCII art picture of a machine gun with the text "OFF THE PIGS".

They also posted the real names, usernames, and passwords of seven Arizona Department of Public Safety officials.  They post the home phone numbers of four officials, and the home addresses of three of them -- including a highway patrol officer named Steven G. Loya.

In their press release the group writes:

We are releasing hundreds of private intelligence bulletins, training manuals, personal email correspondence, names, phone numbers, addresses and passwords belonging to Arizona law enforcement. We are targeting AZDPS specifically because we are against SB1070 and the racial profiling anti-immigrant police state that is Arizona.

The documents classified as "law enforcement sensitive", "not for public distribution", and "for official use only" are primarily related to border patrol and counter-terrorism operations and describe the use of informants to infiltrate various gangs, cartels, motorcycle clubs, Nazi groups, and protest movements.
Every week we plan on releasing more classified documents and embarassing personal details of military and law enforcement in an effort not just to reveal their racist and corrupt nature but to purposefully sabotage their efforts to terrorize communities fighting an unjust "war on drugs".

Hackers of the world are uniting and taking direct action against our common oppressors - the government, corporations, police, and militaries of the world. See you again real soon! ;D

S
teve Harrison, a Arizona DPS spokesperson stated, "We are aware of computer issues. We're looking into it. And of course we're taking additional security safeguards."

II. Hack Casts Light on Controversial Law

SB1070, "The Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act",  was passed by the Arizona state legislature last year and signed into law in late April 2010.  The bill was ostensibly designed to crack down on the large amount of illegal immigration from Mexico, the U.S.'s southern neighbor.

The new law contained a number of provisions, including making it a felony offense to transport illegal immigrants and instituting new fines for those caught hiring illegal immigrants.

But its most contentious provision is that it requires "legal" aliens to carry their documents with them at all times, and allows police officers to ask for documents individuals they "suspect" might be illegal aliens, during routine investigations.

The bill's critics say the measure institutes a standard of racial profiling since many illegal aliens are Hispanic.

Polls from mid-2010 [1][2] indicate between 55 and 70 percent of Americans supported the measure.  Of those who didn't support, it, one poll indicates nearly half of them opposed it because they felt it didn't go far enough, surprisingly.  However, a poll by the Associated Press and Univision showed that race was a deep determinant of support, with most whites supporting the poll, but most Hispanics opposing it.  

Some Arizona police officers said that they would not try to enforce the new law out of moral objections, even if they were told to.

Several lawsuits and legal challenges have been filed against the law, which they say amounts to legislated racism and is unconstitutional.  A Federal U.S. District Judge, Susan Bolton, issued an injunction last July, right before the law was set to go into full effect.

She barred several parts of the law, including a provision "authorizing the warrantless arrest of a person" suspected of being an illegal immigrant, a provision that makes it a crime to fail to apply for or carry alien registration papers, and a provision that makes it a crime "for an unauthorized alien to solicit, apply for, or perform work."

While some may have mixed feelings on illegal immigration, they may wish to make note that the act is the latest of multiple bills on a state and federal level that look to expand allowances for warrantless arrests of American citizens not committing crimes.

III. Government Can't Catch LulzSec to Save Their Servers

The recent LulzSec hacks on U.S. government agencies -- which include distributed denial of service takedown of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agencya hack of U.S. Senate servers, and an attack on an affiliate of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation -- have yet again demonstrated an appalling level of incompetence in cybersecurity on a state and federal level.

A recent government audit found that one in three FBI cyber investigations officers was incompetent by industry standards.

Despite rival hackers posting the handles of LulzSec's key players -- "Topiary", "Sabu", and "Kayla" (M) -- they seem no closer to arrest the group's members.

Thus far the only arrest has been a hacker who went by "Chippy1337" (real name: Ryan Cleary).  A former member of the 4-Chan-related hacker collective Anonymous, Mr. Cleary reportedly had published server logs of members of Anonymous.  The group responded by excommunicating the young man and "doxing" him -- reveal his real world identity, including address, online.

Mr. Cleary had marginal ties to LulzSec, maintaining one of their several IRC chat servers.  He was arrested in Britain earlier this week.

Similar to the arrest of Robert Cavenaugh -- another hacker who anger Anonymous -- Mr. Cleary's arrest shows what seems to be a clear effort by LulzSec and/or Anonymous to feed the government supposed members (really enemies of the group) to throw them off their trail.

Recent posts have revealed that LulzSec is a splinter group of Anonymous who wanted to perform higher profile attacks, and thus distanced themselves from the greater group.  The group's members are believed to have orchestrated the February 2011 attacks on security firm HBGary, which cast a light on CEO Aaron Barr's questionable social engineering tactics.  Disgraced, Mr. Barr was forced to resign to "focus on taking care of my family and rebuilding my reputation."


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: ILLEGAL allien. Did you miss the illegal part?
By Lanister on 6/24/2011 12:50:47 PM , Rating: 5
Wow, people are still so clueless about what this law does. SB1070 does NOT allow law enforcement officers to simply stop anyone they see on the street and ask them for their papers. There has to be prior legal contact and then suspicion during that contact for them to ask for ID.

So if you are Illegal and are obeying the law, other than the one you already broke to get here, then you have nothing to worry about. If you get pulled over for speeding, and don't speak English or are unable to provide a valid ID then this law kicks in and the officer is allowed to check into your legal status.

But why bother with the facts of the Law..


By kattanna on 6/24/2011 1:40:34 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
But why bother with the facts of the Law..


um.. because that doesnt make for catchy headlines??


RE: ILLEGAL allien. Did you miss the illegal part?
By adrift02 on 6/24/11, Rating: 0
RE: ILLEGAL allien. Did you miss the illegal part?
By nolisi on 6/24/2011 4:36:35 PM , Rating: 2
Not when I run or take a stroll around the block. Sometimes I go up to the corner store with a $20. Sometimes I take my dog on a walk for a couple miles so he gets his excercise for the day.

It's not unreasonable to be around without ID, and cops can stop you anywhere that's not your private property.

I like how you also assume that it's impossible that ID gets lost, destroyed or stolen as well...


RE: ILLEGAL allien. Did you miss the illegal part?
By tng on 6/24/2011 7:56:37 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
It's not unreasonable to be around without ID, and cops can stop you anywhere that's not your private property.
I don't think it is a good idea to actually leave my property without my ID. My wallet is easy to put into running shorts, and you never know....

As for losing your ID, been there and had to deal with that. That is why I don't leave the house without my ID now, it was quite a hassle.


By kake on 6/25/2011 12:37:54 PM , Rating: 2
Especially if you decide to pick up beer on the way home. They still card me at 30.


By th3pwn3r on 6/25/2011 2:49:43 PM , Rating: 1
Good luck keeping that wallet in your pocket if you actually COULD run :D I normally keep I.D. on me but when I go running at my local park it isn't one of those times. It really doesn't matter either since they have a massive data base with every LEGAL person here in it. The flags go up when a search comes back empty. Carrying I.D. does make things a lot easier for law enforcement though, I won't deny that.


By The0ne on 6/27/2011 5:02:23 AM , Rating: 1
I don't think this is the problem. The problem comes about when officers make an excuse to stop someone because of their profiling. They can claim whatever they want in stopping the person or group but not call cops follow the law to the dot. Hell, normal officers don't even do this. See my other reply about being stopped because of a camera flash and being ticketed because he didn't want to look stupid...all the while smiling and giggling like a little bitch.

It would be nice if all law enforcement officers follow it but you know as well as I do that not all do. It's just human nature to have aholes in any loaction at any time.


By soyItaliana on 6/30/2011 4:45:34 PM , Rating: 2
Oh like " I thought you had a busted tail light when I stopped you but I guess not, while I have you stopped though I need to see your papers" ? : )


"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki