Print 51 comment(s) - last by Pirks.. on Jun 27 at 12:06 PM

Apple claims that Samsung Galaxy Tab tablets (right) violate its patented design and technology found in its iPad (iPad 2, shown right).  (Source: Daily Mobile)

Apple also accuses Samsung's Galaxy S smart phone of ripping off its iPhone.  (Source: Sizzle Core)
Company says Samsung worked "slavishly" to duplicate its designs and infringe upon its IP

Details have been released about a suit Apple, Inc. (AAPL) filed against fellow gadget maker Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (SEO:005930) in South Korea's Seoul Central District Court.  The suit was filed on Wednesday, June 22 and claims that the best-selling Samsung Galaxy S copies the design of the iPhone 3G.

The lawsuit comes after comments by company officials who accused the gadget maker of "slavishly" imitating the iPhone.

Samsung will definitely have the home court advantage in the case.  It is one of South Korea's largest conglomerates, accounting for about a fifth of the nation's exports.  Samsung Electronics, one of the Group's many subsidiaries, is the world's largest electronics company by sales.  It's expected to soon pass Finland's Nokia Oyj. (HEL:NOK1V) to become the world's largest phonemaker.

The suit follows an April 15 complaint filed in U.S. federal court against Samsung.  The complaint alleges that the Galaxy family of devices that include the Galaxy S smartphone models and Galaxy Tab tablet models violate a number of Apple patents.  

Among them, Apple says the devices infringe on its touch screen user gestures patents, including selecting, scrolling, pinching and zooming. It also claims to have invented a "flat black face", which is among the three design patents Samsung is accused of violating.

Samsung had petitioned the court to force Apple to turn over prototypes of its future iPads and iPhones to show differences or similarities between the two companies designs.  Samsung lost that motion on June 22 (Wednesday).

Samsung has filed four counter-suits against Apple in Seoul, South Korea, Tokyo, Japan, Mannheim, Germany and the U.S., claiming Apple violate ten of its patents.  

Ironically the pair were formerly quite close.  In fact Samsung Electronics has designed Apple's last several iPhone/iPad processors, with the help of contractors like Intrinsity.  Samsung was also among the companies that was rumored to be a possible partner for Apple's potential upcoming LCD television display launch.  Apple also uses Samsung memory chips in several of its devices.

The pairs' relationship, much like that of Apple and Google Inc. (GOOG), deteriorated as both companies accelerated their smartphone and tablet plans.  Currently Samsung is beating Apple in phone sales, though some of its phones are traditional handsets.  Overall Google's Android OS hardware partners -- like Samsung -- are outselling the iPhone over two-to-one, according to recent studies.

As it can't outsell Android, Apple appears resigned to try to out-sue the rival.  The company's efforts were dealt a setback when a judge in another case -- a suit against, Inc. (AMZN) over its "Appstore for Android" -- said that she was preparing to dismiss a major motion in that case.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Apple trying to get more media attention...
By fteoath64 on 6/25/2011 2:59:00 AM , Rating: 2
"officials who accused the gadget maker of "slavishly" imitating the iPhone.". This is NOT illegal besides Samsung can argue that their handsets/tablets has their name clearly marked on the top front of the device while Apple devices are devoid of name or markings in front!.
This is a very strong legal argument with regards to identification of the device concerned!. Imagine the argument of SamSung lawyer " Look our product has clearly marked name in front of the device, so unless your are illiterate or blind, you CANNOT possibly mistaken this as a competing device. It is clearly a SamSung device.

(For once, Apple's lawyers really looked like complete idiots and the judge twiddling his thumbs looking at the ceiling. )

By robinthakur on 6/27/2011 6:01:27 AM , Rating: 2
Yes, but people who don't know better and don't follow technology (slavishly) might think it was a brand of 'iPhone' which they have seen advertised, then get very disappointed when they realise they have been duped and they can't download apps etc from the Appstore. This sounds ridiculous, but it does happen more than you think where phone sales people see the opportunity to make a sale and take advantage of people without explaining what the difference is. I think Samsung did very obviously copy the look and feel o the iPhone 3G then the 4 and I'm not the only person I know who has seen an advert for a Galaxy S, done a double take and then worked out that it isn't actually an iPhone.

"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki