backtop


Print 10 comment(s) - last by sprockkets.. on Jun 27 at 7:50 PM


Oracle has been dealt a setback in its legal campaign against Google's Android OS. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office struck down multiple claims in its patents, upon review.  (Source: Bloomberg News)

Google continues to grow more dominant in the search and advertising markets with every passing year. However, the U.S. may have trouble bringing charges against Google, as having a monopoly, in and of itself is not illegal in the U.S.  (Source: WSJ)
You win some, you lose some as they say

Google Inc. (GOOG) received some happy news from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office(USPTO).  Oracle Corp. (ORCL), who contends that code used by Google's Android smartphone operating system infringes on patents held by Oracle acquisition Sun Microsystems, was dealt a setback by the USPTO who recently reexamined three of its patents.

I. Victory Over Oracle

Oracle's patents pertaining to Java were dissected during a re-review by the USPTO.  Of the 66 claims in the patents, 50 of them were subjected to reexamination.  Of those, 46 of them were ruled invalid.  At a 92 percent invalidation rate, the USPTO is sticking close to the 90 percent rejection rate that academic studies found it averages during re-reviews.

If Oracle's remaining four patents receive similar treatment, Oracle's six patents could be reduced from around 168 claims to around 51 claims.  Further, as some of the remaining claims are likely dependent claims, the damage to the patents will likely be severe, if the current course is followed.

Depleted of its legal firepower, Oracle may be forced to drop the case or offer Google a favorable licensing settlement.  In short things are looking very good for Google in the case.

II. Google Staff Face Subpoenas

In the bad news department, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission is reportedly preparing to issue subpoenas of Google staff in the investigation into whether it abused its dominant search and web-advertising position, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Subpoenas are a key tool to investigators as they can provide key testimony and insight into a company's inner workings.  While the investigation is currently only a probe, the results of the subpoenas could lead to a full fledge investigation.

Antitrust lawyers say it will be difficult to prove that Google acted illegally and abused its internet monopoly.  The company is facing lawsuits that claim it looked to crush small service competitors in the Android ecosystem, using underhanded tactics.  However, emails obtained in these cases show Google employees learned from the 1990s antitrust case against Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) and were more careful about what they committed to writing.

That said, Google has set aside $500M USD, according to financial documents, to cover possible antitrust fines.

Google, currently under investigation being formally investigated by the European Union for antitrust violations, serves approximately two-thirds of internet searches.  The company's rivals accuse it of deceptive display of search content, using rival firms' content without permission, manipulation of search results, and buying out would-be competitors.

Describes Fairsearch.org, an industry group representing Microsoft, Expedia, Inc. (EXPE), Kayak.com, and Sabre Holdings, "Google engages in anticompetitive behavior…that harms consumers by restricting the ability of other companies to compete to put the best products and services in front of Internet users, who should be allowed to pick winners and losers online, not Google."

Finer details will likely be ironed out as the FTC balances Google and its competitors’ statements.  Nonetheless, subpoenas would make the first major probing of Google's competitive behavior, not pertaining to a specific acquisition.  For that reason Google's executive management can't be too thrilled about this development.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: boo ****ing hoo
By cmdrdredd on 6/26/2011 4:35:33 PM , Rating: 2
It's always fun to pick on the big guy. Microsoft had it, Apple had it. Ridiculous. Success is hated for some reason. Maybe Microsoft, Yahoo and other search engines should just change their practices and compete so I don't have to use Google eh?


RE: boo ****ing hoo
By Taft12 on 6/27/2011 11:39:50 AM , Rating: 2
It's only the "big guy" who is able to leverage their dominance in one area to squeeze others in a related area.

History has shown us this always happens in the business world. That's why antitrust law exists and only the markets largest players can be targets. The big players need to tread lightly, and that's a good thing for all citizens.


"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki