backtop


Print 76 comment(s) - last by Norseman4.. on Jun 26 at 5:33 PM


Toyota Prius v

Toyota Prius c Concept
Toyota prepares its 40 mpg "family" hatchback

We first brought you news of the production version of the Prius v, a larger variant of the popular Prius, back in January. The Prius v is the latest effort by Toyota to expand its hybrid reach and make the Prius nameplate its best selling model in the United States (that honor currently goes to the Camry). 

Ed Larocque, Toyota's Marketing Manager of Advanced Technology, has confirmed that the 5-seat hatchback will go on sale in October of this year. The Prius v was supposed to go on sale this summer, but the earthquake that hit Japan in March altered Toyota's production schedule. 

Toyota hopes that it will find 30,000 buyers a year in the U.S. for its new Prius v, which shouldn't be too hard a target to hit. Toyota sold 140,928 Prii in 2010 alone. 

The larger body of the Prius v allows it to have more cargo room than its sibling (34.3 cu ft behind the rear seats versus 21.6 cu ft). Toyota says that this better use of space will make the vehicle a better fit for young families who don't want to step up to a mammoth minivan or crossover.

Unfortunately, maximum seating capacity for the Prius v is an un-minivan-like five. Toyota offers a seven-seat variant of the Prius v in Japan which is made possible because the Japanese market vehicle uses a smaller, lighter lithium-ion battery pack which is located between the front seats. In an effort to keep costs in check for the U.S. market, Toyota decided to use an older style nickel-metal hydride battery pack which is located in the cargo area, robbing space for the third-row seat. 

Another downside is that the Prius v uses the same powertrain as the standard Prius, yet it is over 200 pounds heavier. That means that 60 mph comes up in a leisurely 11.5 seconds. The added weight and inferior aerodynamic design mean that the Prius v can "only" muster 40 mpg combined compared to 50 mpg combined for the Prius.

Pricing has not yet been announced, but it expect the Prius v to be priced a few thousand more than a comparably equipped Prius.

The Prius family will grow yet again this time next year with the 50+ mpg subcompact Prius c.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Drawbacks
By cruisin3style on 6/24/2011 4:11:17 PM , Rating: 2
Yes fine they are keeping more of their money and no one is giving anyone anything, nitpick the wording to make your point thats great. You aren't the only person who focuses on the wrong part of what someone says to disprove something they never said.

I never said all money belongs to government, i never said they get to decide how much of it we get to keep. I am saying you are a huge jacka$$ that continuously puts words in other people's mouths or infers what you feel like out of what someone says.

Please tell me where I said either of those things. Please tell me the last time you voted Democrat, because I voted Republican in 2010 and am absolutely prepared to do so in 2012 because I am absolutely an independent, if not with a left-leaning bias.

Who said growth? Certainly not me. Please tell me how, if the government has to borrow billions of dollars because it isn't collecting taxes on millionaires that it previously did, that is growth and not debt. The 250k tax cut bonus was $800 billion total through 2010 so let's say the millionaires cost, what, a quarter of that? for the hell of it. So unless I'm wrong every year from Bush through current has had more than $20 billion in deficits. So since government spending was not curbed, I guess we borrowed to make up for money the government was no longer receiving. So you're saying the distinction that is so important to make is that the government is spending money on the unemployed but it just isn't collecting money on millionaires anymore, despite that both of these actions added to money the government needs to borrow because they did not decrease spending in other areas to make up for either measure? The important part certainly isn't that one is providing a relatively small amount of money to people who are out of work and maybe struggling to provide for their families, versus not collecting money from millionaires who probably aren't struggling. And certainly those unemployed are less likely to spend that money versus people who are paid $1 million dollars a year or more. Typical Righty...just right right RIGHT.


RE: Drawbacks
By cruisin3style on 6/24/2011 4:29:34 PM , Rating: 2
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs%5C88xx%5Cdoc8893%5Cblog...

I'm sure they can't be trusted until a republican administration is in, but until we receive that gospel we may have to settle for this


“Then they pop up and say ‘Hello, surprise! Give us your money or we will shut you down!' Screw them. Seriously, screw them. You can quote me on that.” -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng referencing patent trolls














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki