Ex "Duke Nukem Forever" PR Firm Speaks Out About Threatening Tweet
June 22, 2011 2:27 PM
comment(s) - last by
Jim Redner explains what led to the tweet that got him fired from 2K Games
"Duke Nukem" fans
waited nearly two decades
for the follow up to "Duke Nukem 3D," which was released in 1996. Now that its successor, "Duke Nukem Forever," is finally here, many are wishing it would go back where it came from and stay there.
Such negative reviews did not sit well with
the Redner Group
, which is a video game PR company founded by Jim Redner in April 2009. Until recently, 2K Games was a client of the Redner Group, and the PR company was responsible for promoting and marketing "Duke Nukem Forever." But after Redner read a particularly nasty review of the game, he used Twitter to vent his frustration and 2K Games fired the Redner Group.
"Too many went too far with their reviews...we r reviewing who gets games next time and who doesn't based on today's venom," said Redner's tweet.
This comment stirred the journalistic community, who saw Redner's tweet as a threat that whoever gives 2K Games' titles a bad review will be blacklisted from receiving video games for review in the future.
Now, Redner has appeared as a
guest columnist on
to give a lengthy explanation of why he said what he said, and to clarify a few points. He described the particular review as being hateful and negative instead of fair, which led him to write the tweet.
"Opinions are never wrong," said Redner. "Reviews, when backed by fact, are always correct regardless of the score. The reviewer's story was downright mean spirited. It's as if the reviewer had a grudge and finally found an outlet to unleash his hostile brand of negativity. The review goes so far as to disparage the people who poured thousands of irreplaceable hours of their life, spent absent from families and loved ones, into the creation of this game."
While he did say that his actions were inappropriate and that he overreacted, Redner also defended his act by saying it was done out of an "act of passion." He explained that he was particularly tired and frustrated that evening, and made a rash decision to vent on Twitter where 15 million people can see what he says.
"It was a brain fart of epic proportions that registered on the social media Richter scale," said Redner.
"First and foremost, I do not support the McCarthy era notion of blacklisting. My tweet was not some social media form of the Waldorf Statement. I never used the word blacklist in my tweet. The term appeared in a story on
. I said that there were
some reviews that had gone too far
and that I was going to re-evaluate our reviews process (it was just one review and it wasn't even the lowest scored review). I have already apologized for my blunder and I will not do so again."
Redner went on to describe what it took to promote "Duke Nukem Forever," such as traveling from writer to writer to spread the word, hunting for clips, sending copies of the game to reviewers and meeting all client needs.
"'Duke Nukem Forever' was a labor of love for me,'" said Redner.
Redner also described the selection process when mailing copies of the game to writers. He noted that publishers do not
to send copies of games to reviewers. They have the right to select who they want to send it to just like writers have the right to write any review they please. He mentioned that the selection process is based on past coverage, past dealings and personal information gathered from certain writers, like their likes and dislikes as far as gaming goes. This selection process was not "blacklisting" certain writers, as other reports have pointed out.
"It is my job to generate consumer awareness and excitement through positive media attention in order to drive sales," said Redner. "I had handpicked certain key editors that I felt would enjoy the game for what it is. I based my selections on previous coverage and personal conversations. It is a selection process. The idea was to generate the highest possible cumulative scores for the game at launch."
Overall, Redner believes a particular review (which remains unnamed by Redner) had gone too far in regards to the poor review given to
"Duke Nukem Forever."
He believes writers can write poor reviews, but not to the extent of the anonymous review he speaks of. He mentioned that he still respects the honest and fair journalists he has worked with over the years, and wishes he had gone about this a different way.
"In hindsight, what I should have done was contact that writer directly and had an adult conversation about the issue, as I have done in the past," said Redner.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Who cares?
6/23/2011 11:52:15 AM
Typically when someone pulls a quote out and leaves off the rest of the sentence, they begin to read things out of context. Which... is exactly what you did. Let me explain that sentence a bit more as I guess the intent wasn't clear.
When I read Ebert's review, my only thought was, "Okay... there's a little girl that swears and kills people, but what about the rest of the movie?" He essentially went on a moral tirade about a single character that he found morally reprehensible and ignored any other aspect of the film. How was the music... the cinematography... the (other) characters? His review wasn't a review... it was a rant. A review needs a sense of objectivity to be effective.
I was looking around Rotten Tomatoes the other day, and I noticed that a new Winnie the Pooh movie was coming out and had a few reviews already. Curiosity got the better of me, and I looked at it regardless of my interest in the movie :P. There was a negative review for the movie that was along the same lines as the Ebert review where the reviewer essentially stated that he never liked the Pooh stories, and that he hates this movie too. How is that review helpful at all?
"This is about the Internet. Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis
Take-Two Stock Tumbles on Disappointing 'Duke Nukem Forever' Reviews
June 15, 2011, 1:23 PM
"Duke Nukem Forever" Leaks to Torrent Sites
June 8, 2011, 9:40 AM
"Duke Nukem Forever" Goes Gold, Nears Release Date
May 24, 2011, 1:34 PM
Testers Trolled by Promise of Uninstallable Windows 10 Preview Build 10061
April 16, 2015, 2:52 PM
Rumors Heat up About 2016 Windows 10.1 (Windows "Redstone") Release
April 8, 2015, 9:26 PM
Report: Windows 10 Successor is Codenamed "Redstone" After Minecraft Item
April 7, 2015, 2:03 PM
Windows 10 Build 10049 Installation May Take Hours, Will Fail if You Have < 8 GB
March 31, 2015, 2:59 PM
Windows 10 Build 10049 Airs, Complete With Project Spartan Browser
March 30, 2015, 7:12 PM
Office 2016 Preview Comes to Mac w/ Retina Support
March 6, 2015, 3:32 PM
Most Popular Articles
Windows 10 Build 10056 -- What's New in the Latest Leak
April 13, 2015, 10:38 PM
TSMC Hypes Its Upcoming 10 nm Process, Amid Struggles to Hit Volume at 16 nm
April 10, 2015, 7:57 PM
Sharp Unveils World's First "4K" Phone Display at Mind-Boggling 806 PPI
April 13, 2015, 11:24 AM
In California Hippies, Religious Right Find Common Enemy in Vaccine Science
April 9, 2015, 4:42 PM
Editorial: TinEye is an Essential Search Engine That Too Few Know About
April 14, 2015, 10:58 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information