Print 80 comment(s) - last by The Raven.. on Jun 23 at 1:58 PM

LulzSec and Anonymous have joined forces to declare war on international governments and banks.  (Source: LulzSec)

U.S. law enforcement still seems no closer to catching LulzSec members.  (Source: AP Photo)

Note to the LA Times and media at large -- LulzSec and Anonymous aren't at war, despite LulzSec's attacks on certain 4Chan members.  (Source: Tony Pierce)
Group appears to be refocused on "socially minded" hacking

LulzSec ("Lulz Security") has made a name for itself with its many hacks [1][2][3] of Sony Corp. (TYO:6758)  But its most daring hacks have been a distributed denial of service takedown of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, a hack of U.S. Senate servers, and an attack on an affiliate of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation

Despite these audacious attacks, the U.S. government appears to be no closer to finding the merry cyber bandits.  There have been no accurate reports of homes being raided; no arrests yet made.

I. Declaration of War

Looking to up the ante, LulzSec has announced its intention to team up with the hacker collective Anonymous to attack international government and financial institutions, who the group accuses are the hoarders of "corrupt booty".  The U.S. government and banking system are among the most prominent targets.  Labeling these parties "terrorists" (a term some are applying to the LulzSec members themselves), it writes [PasteBin]:

Salutations Lulz Lizards,

As we're aware, the government and whitehat security terrorists across the world continue to dominate and control our Internet ocean. Sitting pretty on cargo bays full of corrupt booty, they think it's acceptable to condition and enslave all vessels in sight. Our Lulz Lizard battle fleet is now declaring immediate and unremitting war on the freedom-snatching moderators of 2011.

Welcome to Operation Anti-Security (#AntiSec) - we encourage any vessel, large or small, to open fire on any government or agency that crosses their path. We fully endorse the flaunting of the word "AntiSec" on any government website defacement or physical graffiti art. We encourage you to spread the word of AntiSec far and wide, for it will be remembered. To increase efforts, we are now teaming up with the Anonymous collective and all affiliated battleships.

Whether you're sailing with us or against us, whether you hold past grudges or a burning desire to sink our lone ship, we invite you to join the rebellion. Together we can defend ourselves so that our privacy is not overrun by profiteering gluttons. Your hat can be white, gray or black, your skin and race are not important. If you're aware of the corruption, expose it now, in the name of Anti-Security.

Top priority is to steal and leak any classified government information, including email spools and documentation. Prime targets are banks and other high-ranking establishments. If they try to censor our progress, we will obliterate the censor with cannonfire anointed with lizard blood.

It's now or never. Come aboard, we're expecting you...

History begins today.

The campaign appears to be a departure of LulzSec's tradition of DDoS griefing and brings to mind Anonymous's hacks of Bank of America and HBGary.  Particularly interesting is the notion of hacking government sites to ferret out corruption.  

The online community tends to have mixed feelings on such efforts.  Many are mildly supportive, but a prevailing sentiment is "Who is watching the watchmen?"  

As Wikileaks has arguably demonstrated, it's easy for such efforts to devolve into financially-motivated publicity campaigns and for lives and reputations to be endangered by careless publication.

II. First Strike

In its first effort in the new campaign, LulzSec took down the website of Britain's Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) agency, an agency which performs similar duties to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and the U.S Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

The group posted to Twitter:

Tango down - - in the name of #AntiSec

The SOCA page now appears to have come back to life and is fully reachable.

We'll update here as more attacks come.

III. Anonymous and LulzSec -- Friends Till the End

While we correctly reported that LulzSec's botnet was composed partially of 4Chan users of the '/b/' message board, some publications [1][2] became a bit overeager and erroneously jumped to the conclusion that Anonymous (who frequents 4Chan) were at war with LulzSec.

Both groups firmly dispelled such notions.

Anonymous's AnonOps Twitter account posted:

Attention #Media: about #Lulzsec and #Anonymous, we are not at war. We are bros of teh internetz. Also, /b/ != Anonymous.

"YourAnonNews", another Twitter affiliated with the group, added:

We are NOT at war with @LulzSec #MediaFags

And LulzSec wrote:

To confirm, we aren't going after Anonymous. 4chan isn't Anonymous to begin with, and /b/ is certainly not the whole of 4chan. True story.

/b/ is the peon of all the 4chan boards and 4chan is the mass amplification of crowdsourcing used by AnonOps to gain support. #MediaFacts

Saying we're attacking Anonymous because we taunted /b/ is like saying we're going to war with America because we stomped on a cheeseburger.

So that's settled -- LulzSec and Anonymous are friends -- even if some 4Chan users are upset at the fact that their computers were taken over.

IV. Anonymous Members' Handles Exposed?

One site LulzSecExposed is generating a lot of attention for claiming to carry chat logs taken from inside LulzSec by "Web Ninjas" for the purpose of "Bringing Lulz to hack victims."  

The chat logs include the groups handles ("Sabu", "Neuron", "storm","Recursion_", "trollpoll","io", "Topiary", "JoePie91", and "tflow"), the name of at least one of the group member's virtual proxy network server ("HideMyAss"), and more.

Among the amusing revelations is that some members appear to have quit as the government attacks started.  Reads one log:

Jun 03 23:31:23 Sabu recursion and devurandom quit respectfully
Jun 03 23:31:27 
Sabu saying they are not up for the heat
Jun 03 23:31:32 
Sabu you realize we smacked the fbi today

Later in the log they advise a new member how to cover his tracks, commenting:

Jun 03 23:40:32 ‹Neuron› Yo anyone have any extra tips for staying safe?
Jun 03 23:43:08 ‹Sabu›  clean your box out, make sure any sensitive info you have encrypted on a usb stick
Jun 03 23:43:12 ‹Sabu›  stay behind your vpn
Jun 03 23:43:16 ‹Sabu›  from now on your vpn is your weapon
Jun 03 23:43:23 ‹Sabu›  without your weapon you are nothing
Jun 03 23:43:30 ‹Sabu›  without you it is notihng blah blah blah
Jun 03 23:43:34 ‹Neuron› haha
Jun 03 23:43:39 ‹Sabu›  and dont do nothing we dont approve of :D
Jun 03 23:44:04 ‹Neuron› Alright right now.. My "hackbox" has 512 aes encryption on the entire harddrive
Jun 03 23:44:18 ‹Neuron› two passwords and truecrypt on info concerning anything hacking related
Jun 03 23:44:24 ‹Neuron› and my vpn is HideMyAss
Jun 03 23:44:43 ‹storm› sabu
Jun 03 23:44:55 ‹storm›  my netbook will be here win only a matter of days
Jun 03 23:45:01 ‹storm›  and ill be wiping my entire system
Jun 03 23:45:05 ‹storm›  desktop
Jun 03 23:45:14 ‹storm›  and just encrypting the entire drive
Jun 03 23:45:16 ‹Neuron› im already wiping my enitre desktop
Jun 03 23:45:16 ‹storm›  after i scrub it
Jun 03 23:45:58 ‹Sabu›  yeah
Jun 03 23:46:01 ‹Sabu›  wipe it all
Jun 03 23:46:04 ‹Sabu›  im wiping all my shit now

Yet another log indicates that "Topiary" and "JoePie91" are working as public relations team members for the group and helping to channel donations to it via Bitcoin.

If these logs prove real, this could prove very bad news for some members of LulzSec as they might give the government the clues they need to discover their real word identities and/or locations.

That said, there's no real smoking guns in the logs -- yet.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I think this is a good read for some.
By NullSubroutine on 6/20/2011 4:17:52 PM , Rating: 2
I think some people would think differently about the subject if they read Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau. And while the backdrop of abolition is different, the theme of slavery is similar. These individuals, however disliked by some for some ambiguous actions, their current strife is one that is considerably legitimate.

There are those within our government that are wholly corrupt. The government itself abuses the doctrine that gives its existence legitimacy. And how does one cure corruption when the whole system has been infected? How does one recover your liberty from an organization that enforces it will by force?

What the groups propose is a form of civil disobedience and while they may attack the financial sector (which gives the corrupt their means to stay in power), they don't seem to be doing anything beyond pranks and internet sabotage. No one is going to die directly from their attacks on the public FBI, ATF, or other government website.

RE: I think this is a good read for some.
By The Raven on 6/20/2011 6:05:20 PM , Rating: 2
I think some people would think differently about the subject if they read Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau.

I reread it recently and it always sounds to me like he just wrote it yesterday.
The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the people can act through it. Witness the present Mexican war, the work of comparatively a few individuals using the standing government as their tool; for, in the outset, the people would not have consented to this measure.

Sounds like the wars in Libya, Iraq, ... ... ...
It's frickin' timeless and should be required reading everywhere.

It's a quick read...
...or listen:

But it should also be said that we as citizens should try to live withing the law first. And that means sacrifice sometimes. For example I can't complain about our debt crisis if I take gov't grants, etc.

Unfortunately nobody seems to think this way and so now we have hackers trying to level the playing field. Well I don't know who lulzsec or anon is so I can't judge character nor do I know their real intention so I'm not rooting for them, but I am not opposed to civil disobedience and it should be used whenever YOU think you should. Just be prepared to face the consequences if you get caught (a la bradass).

RE: I think this is a good read for some.
By NullSubroutine on 6/20/2011 7:58:37 PM , Rating: 2
The most striking, somewhat unique argument I got from reading it was that (as partially summarized from wikipedia)
people not to just wait passively for an opportunity to vote for justice, because voting for justice is as ineffective as wishing for justice; what you need to do is to actually be just. This is not to say that you have an obligation to devote your life to fighting for justice, but you do have an obligation not to commit injustice and not to give injustice your practical support.

Simply he is saying, if the government is committing injustice, that simply voting for a representative is effectively meaningless to actually stopping the injustice - then even further, you are supporting it.

On a side note I am not necessarily against military action in Libya (however I personally would like to see some consistency from the government in terms of stopping genocide/attacking of civilians), but I am wholly against the idea the President doing it without the Legal approval of Congress with a Declaration of War. However his point that the war being the decision of only a few people is point of fact with most every war (the only exception I can think of was after 9/11 almost every American wanted Afghanistan bombed).

By The Raven on 6/21/2011 11:48:51 AM , Rating: 2
RE: side note
Point taken. Though I would say that people wanted something done. Not necessarily bombing Afghanistan, you know?

Why is it that every time we are attacked on our home turf pretty much everyone is on board with reciprocation? (a la "a date which will live in infamy" or "I can hear you, the rest of the world hears you. And the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon.")

Because the military is part of the DoD (for those new to the US that is the Department of DEFENSE ).

People talk about the Bush Doctrine like it is something new with the Iraq War (or even the Afghanistan War), but what the hell was the Gulf War? Vietnam War? Korean War?
Obama apparently adheres to that doctrine and is just 4 more years of the same thing as far as our foreign policy is concerned... one man acting as "the Decider." How about I am "the Decider" for whether our truly precious troops (family members in mine and many others' case) risk and give their lives for something not related to our immediate defense.

Back on topic:
what you need to do is to actually be just.

This is so true. I hate how people complain about all the white collar crime and there they are taking 50 napkins and 20 'catsup' packets. You are either the kind of person who will take all you can get away with or you have a moral compass. There are so many hypocrites out there and they are what's powering the machine in Washington. They are good people that when forced to make a moral decision would make it. But they let the gov't make all their decisions and their morality is taken out of the equation.

"DailyTech is the best kept secret on the Internet." -- Larry Barber

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki