Report: Anti-Streaming Lobbyists Paid Off Senators Handsomely
June 18, 2011 3:50 PM
comment(s) - last by
Lobbyists reportedly paid 10 percent of U.S. Senators campaign costs in order to push to an anti-streaming internet copyright bill that looks to imprison U.S. citizens.
The U.S. imprisons more inmates than 35 European nations combined. It imprisons more of its citzens than any other nation in the world, at a massive expense to its free taxpayers.
(Source: The Utopianist)
President Barack Obama's administration is pushing the bill to imprison Americans who illegally stream sports, movies, and TV online.
(Source: AP Photo)
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) is among the bill's three cosponsors.
(Source: Getty Images)
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) is another sponsor.
(Source: AP Photo)
The bill's final sponsor is Sen. Chris Coons (D-Dela.).
(Source: AP Photo)
Approximately 10 percent of active Senators' total campaign costs were paid by bill's supporters
on a pending measure in the United States Senate "
The Commercial Felony Streaming Act
" (S. 978). Approved by the
Senate Judiciary Committee
, the bill now moves to the Senate floor for approval.
If approved, the bill promises up to 5 years of hard prison time for anyone who "willfully" infringes content via streaming for the purpose of "personal financial gain". One of the sponsoring organizations, the
Motion Picture Association of America
(MPAA) claims the measure will only be used to charge operators of sites that stream content illegally -- such as sports shows, movies, or TV shows.
But the bill's ambiguous language could eventually be applied to send viewers to jail, as well. After all, the MPAA could easily argue in court that viewers were seeing "personal financial gain" by avoiding cable service fees, movie rental costs, etc.
But that's hardly the biggest story here.
I. Bought and Paid For
The U.S. currently has the world's highest incarceration rate [
; PDF]. Maintaining that dubious distinction is far from cheap -- it cost free U.S. citizens a projected $80B USD in 2010 to support the government imprisoning their peers [
]. So why would the government want to send
U.S. citizens to prison?
by government watchdog group
is to be believed, perhaps the old adage "you get what you pay for" holds true here.
claims that the groups supporting the bill have paid a total of $86M USD to active senators within the last six years.
Let's consider exactly how significant that number is. The U.S. Senate has had 105 seats contested in the last three elections [
]. The average spent by a senate race winner was $8.5M USD in the 2008 elections [
], according to the government watchdog
Center for Responsive Politics
(maintainers of the site "Open Secrets").
So in total the winning Senators in the last three elections had to spend an estimated $892.5M USD to win their seats.
The $86M USD funneled by the anti-streaming lobbyists thus constitutes 9.7 percent of the total funds needed for U.S. Senators to obtain their jobs.
II. Payoffs Bear Real Weight on the Field of Tech Law
Such payoffs (or "bribes" as some people call them) don't always concern the world of technology and the internet. But in this case, the payouts directly affect internet users across America.
Suddenly, watching 10 illegal streams within half a year could send you to prison for 5 years. Again, the MPAA claims they won't press the point this far. But the Bill's ambiguous language is freely available for anyone to read.
Many fans of science and technology hate hearing about politics. They'd rather hear about new processors, search engines, hackers, and nanotubes than legislation, lawsuits, and presidential speeches.
But at the end of the day, the tech and science community of the world's largest technological superpower -- the U.S. -- is being deeply affected by the current state of American politics.
This can be seen in recent incidents such as the efforts to
ban community-approved municipal internet projects
, robbing citizens of their technology -- and their right to self governance. The politicians involved? They were reportedly paid off in campaign contributions by industry lobbyists, as well.
Likewise politicians in several states are considering making it
a jail-time misdemeanor offense to share your password
Netflix, Inc.'s (
) streaming video service. Sharing your Netflix password with family members, roommates, or friends could send you to jail for one year.
III. Who is to Blame?
Dozens of Senators accepted contributions from these lobbies. But it's important to identify the bill's biggest supporters.
Leading the way is U.S. President Barack Obama. Obama pledged
to look into copyright reform
, but those promises were conveniently shelved when he stepped up to the plate pushing his campaign donors real agenda --
. Together with fellow nations like France, Britain, and Germany, the Obama administration has worked to install a secret treaty called the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) whose draft contains many Orwellian provisions, including the
introduction of copyright infringement "thought crime"
, where simply searching for infringed content (thinking of infringing) can lead to charges.
And it was the President's advisors -- the
White House Office of U.S. Intellectual Property Enforcement -- who urged Congress two months ago to pass an anti-streaming bill. But some in the Senate were more than happy to comply; after all who would they be to deny the wishes of some of their biggest campaign donors?
The senators sponsoring the bill are Senators
The support illustrates another aspect of the nature of the problem. On many of these issues affecting the tech community the issue is no longer partisan politics. Both Democrats and Republicans are gleefully accepting campaign donations from industry lobbies and pushing their sponsors' agendas in Washington D.C.
At the end of the day the question here is clear -- who does the President and these Senators answer to and pledge to protect -- the citizens of the nation? Or the entities that paid for them to get their prestigious positions of power?
As the nation that imprisons more of it citizens than any other country -- industrialized or not -- prepares to send yet more of its taxpayers to jail, consider the above.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Only broadcasters
6/21/2011 12:50:12 AM
Even if the government does go after the all viewers, do you really think they are going to go after 100,000 plus viewers for, say a PPV fight.
During the Paqauaio-De La Hoya fight a few years ago, there were several Justin and Ustream channels with 100,000 plus viewers on each of them. One channel alone had 123,000 people on it, at peak viwership, that night.
Do you really think the government is going to waste its time going after as many as 1 million people watching the fight illegally, given all the channels with 100,000 plus viewers that were streaming the fight, there were very likely one million people at any one time watching illegal streams of the fight card.
The prisons are so overcrowded now, where would they put hundreds of thousands, or even millions more inmates? The government already has a deficit crisis with the national debt skyrocketing. The government would not have enough money to prosecute that many people watching a PPV fight.
If a given channel has thousands of viewers, the government is not going to go chasing them all down. Some Justin movie channels often exceed 1,000 viewers, which locks offshore viewers out (Justin requires foreign viewers to pay a fee if the total number of viewers on any one channel exceeds 1,000 viewers).
If they went after every viewer of these channels, the prosecutors would be prosecuting those cases, and nothing else.
That is why those who do not stream for commercial purposes, and just watch videos, do not have to worry, for now, unless they do something really stupid, like show a movie before its release date on video. The government is so effed up financially right now, that it does not have the resources to go after every one of the thousands of viewers that might be watching one stream.
That is why Klobuchar specifically worte her bill so that only those who stream for commercial gain are subject to prosecution. Otherwise the courts would get so clogged with piracy cases, they would not be able to handle anything else.
"It looks like the iPhone 4 might be their Vista, and I'm okay with that." -- Microsoft COO Kevin Turner
U.S. Senate Proposes Prison Time for Illegally Streaming Movies, TV
June 17, 2011, 9:38 AM
Sharing Netflix Password May Soon be a Crime in Tennessee
June 2, 2011, 12:24 PM
REVOLT! NC Towns Take Up Legal Arms Against Anti-Municipal Internet Bill
April 14, 2011, 4:38 PM
ACTA Draft: DRM Bypassing, Thought-Crime are Illegal, P2P Engine Development is Criminal
April 21, 2010, 2:07 PM
Few Nations Support U.S. Decision to Keep Piracy Pact Secret
February 25, 2010, 2:19 PM
Facebook Adds Satire Tags to Its Auto-Generated "Related News" Posts
August 18, 2014, 10:43 AM
Comcast, TWC Pull Dinner Gift for FCC Commissioner... Sort Of
August 15, 2014, 1:10 PM
Comcast Accused of Wooing FCC Commissioner w/ $110K Dinner
August 13, 2014, 8:20 PM
Quick Note: Nokia’s Lumia 520 Available for $39.99 Off Contract Today Only
August 13, 2014, 10:37 AM
Wikipedia Scores $140,000 in Bitcoin Donations in One Week
August 11, 2014, 9:32 AM
China to Require Real Names for Chat Apps
August 8, 2014, 8:28 PM
Most Popular Articles
Lumia 830 Gets Major Upgrades Including New 20.1 Megapixel Toshiba Sensor
August 15, 2014, 6:00 PM
Windows Phone, BlackBerry Smartphone Market Share Falls to 2.5%, 0.5% Respectively
August 15, 2014, 9:44 AM
GM Concedes That the Cadillac ELR Doesn’t Really Compete with the Tesla Model S
August 15, 2014, 5:42 PM
Report: Windows 9 “Threshold” Tech Preview Coming Next Month
August 15, 2014, 11:29 AM
Apple Scores Patents, Preps New Reversible USB Plug for iPhone 6 Connector
August 18, 2014, 1:32 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information