Report: Anti-Streaming Lobbyists Paid Off Senators Handsomely
June 18, 2011 3:50 PM
comment(s) - last by
Lobbyists reportedly paid 10 percent of U.S. Senators campaign costs in order to push to an anti-streaming internet copyright bill that looks to imprison U.S. citizens.
The U.S. imprisons more inmates than 35 European nations combined. It imprisons more of its citzens than any other nation in the world, at a massive expense to its free taxpayers.
(Source: The Utopianist)
President Barack Obama's administration is pushing the bill to imprison Americans who illegally stream sports, movies, and TV online.
(Source: AP Photo)
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) is among the bill's three cosponsors.
(Source: Getty Images)
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) is another sponsor.
(Source: AP Photo)
The bill's final sponsor is Sen. Chris Coons (D-Dela.).
(Source: AP Photo)
Approximately 10 percent of active Senators' total campaign costs were paid by bill's supporters
on a pending measure in the United States Senate "
The Commercial Felony Streaming Act
" (S. 978). Approved by the
Senate Judiciary Committee
, the bill now moves to the Senate floor for approval.
If approved, the bill promises up to 5 years of hard prison time for anyone who "willfully" infringes content via streaming for the purpose of "personal financial gain". One of the sponsoring organizations, the
Motion Picture Association of America
(MPAA) claims the measure will only be used to charge operators of sites that stream content illegally -- such as sports shows, movies, or TV shows.
But the bill's ambiguous language could eventually be applied to send viewers to jail, as well. After all, the MPAA could easily argue in court that viewers were seeing "personal financial gain" by avoiding cable service fees, movie rental costs, etc.
But that's hardly the biggest story here.
I. Bought and Paid For
The U.S. currently has the world's highest incarceration rate [
; PDF]. Maintaining that dubious distinction is far from cheap -- it cost free U.S. citizens a projected $80B USD in 2010 to support the government imprisoning their peers [
]. So why would the government want to send
U.S. citizens to prison?
by government watchdog group
is to be believed, perhaps the old adage "you get what you pay for" holds true here.
claims that the groups supporting the bill have paid a total of $86M USD to active senators within the last six years.
Let's consider exactly how significant that number is. The U.S. Senate has had 105 seats contested in the last three elections [
]. The average spent by a senate race winner was $8.5M USD in the 2008 elections [
], according to the government watchdog
Center for Responsive Politics
(maintainers of the site "Open Secrets").
So in total the winning Senators in the last three elections had to spend an estimated $892.5M USD to win their seats.
The $86M USD funneled by the anti-streaming lobbyists thus constitutes 9.7 percent of the total funds needed for U.S. Senators to obtain their jobs.
II. Payoffs Bear Real Weight on the Field of Tech Law
Such payoffs (or "bribes" as some people call them) don't always concern the world of technology and the internet. But in this case, the payouts directly affect internet users across America.
Suddenly, watching 10 illegal streams within half a year could send you to prison for 5 years. Again, the MPAA claims they won't press the point this far. But the Bill's ambiguous language is freely available for anyone to read.
Many fans of science and technology hate hearing about politics. They'd rather hear about new processors, search engines, hackers, and nanotubes than legislation, lawsuits, and presidential speeches.
But at the end of the day, the tech and science community of the world's largest technological superpower -- the U.S. -- is being deeply affected by the current state of American politics.
This can be seen in recent incidents such as the efforts to
ban community-approved municipal internet projects
, robbing citizens of their technology -- and their right to self governance. The politicians involved? They were reportedly paid off in campaign contributions by industry lobbyists, as well.
Likewise politicians in several states are considering making it
a jail-time misdemeanor offense to share your password
Netflix, Inc.'s (
) streaming video service. Sharing your Netflix password with family members, roommates, or friends could send you to jail for one year.
III. Who is to Blame?
Dozens of Senators accepted contributions from these lobbies. But it's important to identify the bill's biggest supporters.
Leading the way is U.S. President Barack Obama. Obama pledged
to look into copyright reform
, but those promises were conveniently shelved when he stepped up to the plate pushing his campaign donors real agenda --
. Together with fellow nations like France, Britain, and Germany, the Obama administration has worked to install a secret treaty called the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) whose draft contains many Orwellian provisions, including the
introduction of copyright infringement "thought crime"
, where simply searching for infringed content (thinking of infringing) can lead to charges.
And it was the President's advisors -- the
White House Office of U.S. Intellectual Property Enforcement -- who urged Congress two months ago to pass an anti-streaming bill. But some in the Senate were more than happy to comply; after all who would they be to deny the wishes of some of their biggest campaign donors?
The senators sponsoring the bill are Senators
The support illustrates another aspect of the nature of the problem. On many of these issues affecting the tech community the issue is no longer partisan politics. Both Democrats and Republicans are gleefully accepting campaign donations from industry lobbies and pushing their sponsors' agendas in Washington D.C.
At the end of the day the question here is clear -- who does the President and these Senators answer to and pledge to protect -- the citizens of the nation? Or the entities that paid for them to get their prestigious positions of power?
As the nation that imprisons more of it citizens than any other country -- industrialized or not -- prepares to send yet more of its taxpayers to jail, consider the above.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Only broadcasters
6/18/2011 5:04:37 PM
There are so many people who view content, that if they put them all in jail, there would be no room for anyone else.
And with the provision of having had to stream 10 times in 180 days, they are not going to find out everything you do accross all kinds of streaming services.
And services, such as Sopcast or CCAnts, in China, are beyong the authority of US courts. US courts cannot subpoena a video service in China.
And then there is the issue of programs, like Evidence Elimiantor. If they seize your machine, and EE has been used, and they cannot recover evidence, that pretty much does in their case.
RE: Only broadcasters
6/18/2011 5:51:33 PM
the sort of bribery that is mentioned in the article is unfortunately perfectly legal in the US. i think it demeans your political system when the rich can simply buy laws for themselves, regardless of the issue at stake. democKracy, it should be called. shame on these politicians... but tomorrow, everyone will have forgotten about them and those who bought their way in, and they'll all be re-elected next time.
it makes me sad.
RE: Only broadcasters
6/18/2011 8:29:03 PM
Yeah, because they never went after people downloading mp3s and movies...oh wait...
RE: Only broadcasters
6/18/2011 10:33:59 PM
This bill is insane.
Just because you don't want someone to do something doesn't mean you attach a jail sentence to it.
Its really a maneuver to shift the copyright enforcement onto the public dime.
"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone
U.S. Senate Proposes Prison Time for Illegally Streaming Movies, TV
June 17, 2011, 9:38 AM
Sharing Netflix Password May Soon be a Crime in Tennessee
June 2, 2011, 12:24 PM
REVOLT! NC Towns Take Up Legal Arms Against Anti-Municipal Internet Bill
April 14, 2011, 4:38 PM
ACTA Draft: DRM Bypassing, Thought-Crime are Illegal, P2P Engine Development is Criminal
April 21, 2010, 2:07 PM
Few Nations Support U.S. Decision to Keep Piracy Pact Secret
February 25, 2010, 2:19 PM
Dumb Twitter Controversy: Saudis Whine at Michelle Obama's Lack of Head Scarf
January 27, 2015, 4:57 PM
Google Fixes Homophobic "Bug" in its Translator
January 27, 2015, 2:31 PM
Chris Poole Retires From Role as 4Chan After a Decade of Success, Struggles
January 23, 2015, 1:45 PM
Study Shows People are Dumb as Ever With Passwords, Still Using "123456"
January 20, 2015, 3:19 PM
Site for "Glitter as a Service" Mail Pranks, ShipYourEnemiesGlitter, Launches
January 13, 2015, 2:22 PM
OS X Yosemite Compromises Security by Retrieving Embedded Email Images
January 13, 2015, 11:30 AM
Most Popular Articles
Under the Hood: How DirectX 11.3 and 12 Will Supercharge Windows 10 Gaming
January 23, 2015, 12:34 PM
Microsoft Shows Off Latest Windows 10 Build, Preps it for Next Week Release
January 21, 2015, 2:57 PM
BlackBerry CEO Claims Devs are Violating Net Neutrality by Not Supporting BB10
January 22, 2015, 4:37 PM
2016 Cadillac CTS-V Packs 640 hp Punch with 200 mph Reach
January 23, 2015, 3:25 PM
Will Google Become America's Fifth Major Carrier?
January 22, 2015, 12:42 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information