backtop


Print 118 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Jun 26 at 7:02 PM


39% of all corn produced in the U.S. goes to ethanol production   (Source: washingtonexaminer.com)
House to vote next

Lawmakers in Washington are working hard to write and pass laws that would have fuel efficiency standards in the U.S. changing drastically in coming years. While some in Washington support the new standards for vehicle efficiency, others oppose the standards. Along with mandating better fuel economy across a carmakers fleet, Washington is also seeing green and renewable fuel alternatives for vehicles.

In the U.S., ethanol has been added into the fuel we run in vehicles for years. Ethanol is as high as 10% in fuels today and some that are against ethanol, which is derived from corn, claim that the biofuel is increasing the price of some food items in America. A report published by the GAO claims that the use of ethanol has driven the cost of some food items up as much as 20%.

With all of Washington in cost cutting mode in an effort to shore up the federal budget lawmakers are looking at everywhere money can be saved. One place that some in the Senate want to save money is by repealing the subsidy on ethanol. The Senate voted Thursday 73-27 to end a $0.45 per gallon tax credit on ethanol-blended gasoline starting on July 1. According to those that support the repeal, the subsidy cost taxpayers $5.6 billion last year.

Growth Energy, and ethanol association, CEO Tom Buis said, "The Senate missed an enormous opportunity to take real action on deficit reduction and energy policy when it failed to put oil subsidies and giveaways to the same test as ethanol."

On the other side of the coin, Kate McMahon coordinator of biofuels campaigns for Friends of the Earth said, "Senators scored a win for the public and for the environment by voting to end this $6 billion giveaway." She continued saying, "[the Senate delivered a message] that the ethanol industry's days of living high off the taxpayers' hog have come to an end."

The effort to end the ethanol subsidy now goes to the House for voting. White House spokesman Jay Carney says that the Obama administration supports a reduction in the ethanol subsidy, but does not support a full repeal. Some claim that 39% of the corn produced in the U.S. is currently going into fuel tanks. With the costs to reach the proposed 62mpg regulations for fuel economy reaching nearly $10,000, some automakers are calling for the removal of ethanol from gasoline. Ethanol is renewable and greener than petroleum fuel, but reduces fuel economy.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Good riddance.
By Kurz on 6/17/2011 5:52:07 PM , Rating: 3
gas tax goes to paying for upkeep on roads.


RE: Good riddance.
By Targon on 6/18/2011 1:43:29 AM , Rating: 1
That is the theory, but in the same way that money in the Social Security fund wasn't supposed to be mis-appropriated, the gas tax revenues have all been redirected toward other things, like paying for the 30 government aides that some elected officials have.


RE: Good riddance.
By YashBudini on 6/18/2011 1:52:48 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
gas tax goes to paying for upkeep on roads.

Gas taxes here go into the general [slush] fund. What about your state?


RE: Good riddance.
By chick0n on 6/18/2011 8:29:43 AM , Rating: 1
Then maybe you should explain why the roads in NYC are the shittest roads I've ever seen ?

or it could be that Bloomberg has spent it all on useless bike lanes/bus lanes/parks that no one ever use it/make the already jam pack roads EVEN narrower/etc.

Just not using them to fix the roads/potholes ?


RE: Good riddance.
By YashBudini on 6/18/2011 1:40:18 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
Then maybe you should explain why the roads in NYC are the shittest roads I've ever seen ?

That's easily resolved. Try driving through PA to find a whole new low. But yeah NY is also one of those states that puts gas taxes into the general fund.

You neglected the biggest workfare program NY has created, the NYS Thruway. It's purpose is to satisfy political nepotism.


RE: Good riddance.
By YashBudini on 6/18/2011 1:46:53 PM , Rating: 2
chick0n,

It seems you got rated down merely for addressing me. The only thing more lacking on DT than adequate server HP is fairness. Oh well, not much you can do about flamers.


RE: Good riddance.
By shin0bi272 on 6/19/2011 7:12:59 AM , Rating: 2
All tax revenue goes into the general fund and is dispersed according to who lobbies the hardest for the most money.

Here in NC there's a yearly property tax just to have a car on the road... So not only do you have to pay tax, tag and processing when you buy a car, you also have to pay for registration, inspection, and then this tax. They claim its to help the roads but according to their little pie chart that they put on the bottom of the bill (which is bs of course) 65% of it goes to education and only 0.002% of it goes to the road. Yet we have a gas tax to "fix the roads" and a state lottery to "fund education" but we still have to pay this property tax.... oh yeah cause the government can never do with less of our money. Now you know why people have swiss bank accounts.


RE: Good riddance.
By YashBudini on 6/19/2011 4:04:01 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Now you know why people have swiss bank accounts.

Yeah that's another overlooked piece of the pie the Heritage Foundation overlooks when it talks about how high tax rates are for the rich.


"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki