Print 29 comment(s) - last by rdhood.. on Jun 17 at 4:02 PM

Itanium is headed towards its death bed, and HP is suing Oracle for dropping software support, which it claims breaches contract.  (Source: Itanium)

Oracle and HP became bitter rivals after Oracle acquired Sun Microsystems, putting it in a competitive position with its former partner.  (Source: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images North America)
There's no love lost between these two former friends

The heads of the world's largest PC maker, Hewlett-Packard, Comp. (HPQ), and the world's third largest software maker, Oracle Corp. (ORCL), used to sit across from each other in the meeting room planning joint strategies.  Now they're going to be meeting at a new location -- the federal court house.

In a sign of the growing rift between the firms, HP filed suit against Oracle in California (Case "Hewlett-Packard Company v. Oracle Corporation" No:111CV203163) over the software maker's decision to drop support for Intel Corp.'s (INTC) low-volume Itanium processors.

I. HP and Oracle -- Friends Become Enemies

The clash between HP and Oracle traces back to Oracle's 2010 acquisition of Sun Microsystems, which thrust it into a position as a server maker.  Previously, the pair had been dedicated partners for almost 30 years and shared over 140,000 customers.

After the Sun purchase, tensions elevated when Oracle CEO Larry Ellison gave a position to disgraced former HP CEO Mark Hurd.  HP sued Oracle claiming Mr. Hurd had trade secrets and would be in breach of contract.  It eventually settled the case.

Soon after this incident, HP hired Léo Apotheker.  Mr. Apotheker was no friend of Oracle's -- Oracle claims that while he was with German IT business firm SAP AG that he executed a plot to steal Oracle's intellectual property.

With a bitter divide between the companies' leadership and a new competitive position, it's little surprise that the rivalry would come to legal blows.

In a statement HP chief spokesman Bill Wohl states, "The silence from Oracle is deafening. We are very disappointed it has to come to this."

In the suit HP alleges that Oracle violated a contract promising to support Itanium to the bitter end.  The company's lawyers write, "In a mere eight months, Oracle has gone from arm-in-arm partnership with Hewlett-Packard to bitter antagonist."

II. Oracle Fires Back

In a press release, Oracle spokeswoman Deborah Hellinger fires back with an equally stinging rebuke.  She says that Oracle has quite a different recollection with regards to what it signed.

She writes:

It just takes a few minutes to read the early drafts of the agreement to prove that HP’s claim is not true. What is true is that HP explicitly asked Oracle to guarantee continued support for Itanium; but Oracle refused, and HP’s Itanium support guarantee wording was deleted from the final signed agreement.

Here's where it gets interesting -- HP claims the signed document says Oracle does have to support Itanium till its end of life.  Oracle claims its version of the signed document says it doesn't.

III. Itanium: Bye, Bye, Bye

The other thing Oracle and HP's documents reveal is something that IT people could have seen coming -- Itanium is reportedly set to be discontinued by Intel.  This comes hardly as a surprise -- Itanium sales fell abysmally below Intel's projections.

While the chips delivered some promising features, overall performance was poor.  As a result, Itanium was outsold by Sun Microsystems' (now owned by Oracle) SPARC chips and International Business Machines' (IBM) POWER architecture chips.

At the end of the day Itanium still posted a small, but tidy profit for Intel. However, the problem was that the small volume led to software providers ditching the platform.  Among those to quit it included OS makers Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) and Red Hat, Inc. (RHT).  Without software, the hardware became and increasingly tough sell.

As of March of this year, Intel's chief executive Paul Otellini remarked, "Intel's work on Intel Itanium processors and platforms continues unabated with multiple generations of chips currently in development and on schedule. We remain firmly committed to delivering a competitive, multi-generational roadmap for HP-UX and other operating system customers that run the Itanium architecture."

Now that the public knows that the platform is head for end-of-life and has little software support, it's questionable whether any major business would order the chips.  The only remaining question is when the platform will die.

Oracle claims that when HP approached it in September 2010 asking to commit to Itanium till end-of-life, that it already new about Intel's decision to phase the processor out.  It says that it didn't hear about that decision until March 2011 when it was informed by Intel.

The company accuses:

What we know for certain is that Ray Lane and HP’s current board members and Leo Apotheker and HP’s current management team now know full well that Intel has plans in place to end-of-life of the Itanium microprocessor. Knowing this, HP issued numerous public statements in an attempt to mislead and deceive their customers and shareholders into believing that these plans to end-of-life Itanium do not exist. But they do. Intel’s plans to end-of-life Itanium will be revealed in court now that HP has filed this utterly malicious and meritless lawsuit against Oracle.

So which is it? Did HP deceive its former partner trying to trick it into signing a document that it knew would be disadvantageous?  Or was HP merely trying to solidify cooperation between the two firms?  The courts will be the judge of that.      

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Itanium is dead?
By JasonMick on 6/16/2011 12:29:11 PM , Rating: 2
How does that make Itanium "dead" - HP-UX and OpenVMS run exclusively now on Itanium, which if anything, means that Itanium has a market monopoly with no competitors!

Err... HP-UX and OpenVMS are both developed (or the case of OpenVMS co-developed) by HP, so Itanium is a single-vendor system now, in effect (though DEC co-develops OpenVMS)

SPARC, POWER, and Itanium all occupy the same niche of mission-critical services. So they are comparable.

As to the item of Itanium approaching end of life (preparing to die), that's what Oracle says Intel told it. If Oracle is lying that will be exposed and it will likely have a substantial civil ($$) liability. I doubt Oracle would be that stupid, so for now I'm taking its statement at face value.

Intel and HP's statements on the topic were kinda like the Anthony Weiner interviews -- they won't confirm or deny end of life. They merely remark that they're "committed" to the current roadmap, which will last several years and see a few more releases. Past that, they've stated nothing to deny that the lineup will be phased out.

It's likely HP and Intel are declining to confirm or deny EOL because if they do customers may opt to stop order future models and switch sooner to competitive designs.

Intel likely hold off on that announcement so that it can try to transition Itanium tech into the Xeon lineup and convince its current customers to switch to new Xeon offerings.

RE: Itanium is dead?
By Argon18 on 6/16/2011 2:21:05 PM , Rating: 2
You're missing the point. When you buy HP-UX or OpenVMS, you are buying Itanium. There is no other currently sold processor that will run HP-UX or OpenVMS. So long as there are HP-UX and OpenVMS customers, there will be Itanium customers.

RE: Itanium is dead?
By Black1969ta on 6/16/2011 3:48:12 PM , Rating: 2
I think you have missed the point.

The software layer is of smaller importance than the hardware layer, when a company considers an order of this class of hardware they don't go to a Best Buy and pick the one with the prettiest interface, they choose the hardware that fits the needs of the company best. The software just tags along with the chosen hardware, but if software support is lacking then even the best hardware fails to meet anyone's needs.

RE: Itanium is dead?
By DanNeely on 6/16/2011 4:14:06 PM , Rating: 2
For mission critical systems, even if a different platform is better on paper, the risk of changing platforms is high enough that most buyers go with a faster version of what they already have. The risk of something going wrong during the migration is much higher than the difference in competing platforms.

"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki