backtop


Print 118 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Jun 17 at 11:09 PM


Automakers claim new fuel economy ratings will put hundreds of thousands out of work  (Source: Business Week)
Supporters of increased efficiency standards claim the numbers are inflated

The battle between the auto industry and the federal government over changes to fuel economy regulations is exploding. Lawmakers in Washington want to impose much more efficient standards on future vehicles that could see a fleet wide fuel economy average of 62 mpg in effect by 2025.

Some in the automotive industry argue that the costs to reach the lofty 62 mpg fleet wide average will be much higher than the cost of burning more fuel in less efficient vehicles for consumers. Automakers have previously claimed that the costs would have a dire impact on the industry.

new study by the Center for Automotive Research has been published and the study claims that the rise in efficiency standards by 2025 to 62 mpg could add up to $9,790 to the cost of a new vehicle and will reduce sales by 5.5 million units. The report also claims that the resultant price increase would force a reduction of 260,000 automotive industry jobs due to reduced demand for vehicles by consumers.

On the other side of the battle, those pushing for the increased efficiency standards claim that the tech needed to meet the efficiency standards would only add $770 to $3,500 to the price of a new vehicle.

David Friedman, deputy director of the Union of Concerned Scientists' Clean Vehicles program and supporter of the new efficiency mandate, said, "The Obama administration should ignore this industry-advocate propaganda piece and focus on setting the strongest vehicle efficiency and global warming pollution standards based on credible scientific analysis."

President and CEO of the Union, Jay Baron, says that the main difference in cost between the industry and government studies depends on how much the price of the technology will come down over the next 15 years.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By mindless1 on 6/16/2011 3:16:09 PM , Rating: 2
I suspect you are considering total weight, NOT weight difference. Yes I have installed power seats, swapping out manual seats. The motors are a pound each, maybe two, there was already a metal track for support so the extra tracks add another pound or two (per seat).

ABS modulator is now being integrated into master cylinder, reservoir and valves assembly, for a smaller car there is not much added weight anymore contrasted with years ago. Even with medium to larger cars having the module separate it's closer to 10lb than 20lb in recent years.

I was comparing the difference between a fancy electric sunroof and the older style, since a sunroof isn't a new invention, could be ordered as a factory item on many cars for quite a few years, or of course installed later and this is still optional, it's not hard at all to buy a car without one.

It's been quite a few years since cars were barren of any *luxury* items unless buying some cheap base model economy car, else you have to special order it because of the way things are packaged, dealers tend to have cars with quite a few extras on their lots.


"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki