backtop


Print 118 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Jun 17 at 11:09 PM


Automakers claim new fuel economy ratings will put hundreds of thousands out of work  (Source: Business Week)
Supporters of increased efficiency standards claim the numbers are inflated

The battle between the auto industry and the federal government over changes to fuel economy regulations is exploding. Lawmakers in Washington want to impose much more efficient standards on future vehicles that could see a fleet wide fuel economy average of 62 mpg in effect by 2025.

Some in the automotive industry argue that the costs to reach the lofty 62 mpg fleet wide average will be much higher than the cost of burning more fuel in less efficient vehicles for consumers. Automakers have previously claimed that the costs would have a dire impact on the industry.

new study by the Center for Automotive Research has been published and the study claims that the rise in efficiency standards by 2025 to 62 mpg could add up to $9,790 to the cost of a new vehicle and will reduce sales by 5.5 million units. The report also claims that the resultant price increase would force a reduction of 260,000 automotive industry jobs due to reduced demand for vehicles by consumers.

On the other side of the battle, those pushing for the increased efficiency standards claim that the tech needed to meet the efficiency standards would only add $770 to $3,500 to the price of a new vehicle.

David Friedman, deputy director of the Union of Concerned Scientists' Clean Vehicles program and supporter of the new efficiency mandate, said, "The Obama administration should ignore this industry-advocate propaganda piece and focus on setting the strongest vehicle efficiency and global warming pollution standards based on credible scientific analysis."

President and CEO of the Union, Jay Baron, says that the main difference in cost between the industry and government studies depends on how much the price of the technology will come down over the next 15 years.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By superstition on 6/15/2011 8:51:13 PM , Rating: 2
the list:

http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=319185

And, yes yes... the MPG is in imperial. I think people here can manage to do the conversion.




By The0ne on 6/16/2011 8:22:26 PM , Rating: 2
I was going to say/list the same thing but thank you. Still baffles me why people, even on this forum, continue everyday to discuss and argue over something that has been available and around for years. I don't care if you argue this and that, the point is the vehicles are available and some at much higher MPGs.

We have the means and even if the middle isn't clear to everyone we can work on them to make them better, BUT the end result IS there already. What's so hard to understand? If anything, understanding bureaucracy and politics on these issues should be the problem.


By superstition on 6/17/2011 1:41:40 AM , Rating: 2
I'm glad someone understands this.

Unfortunately, myopia and bizarre solutions appear to be the name of the game here.


"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki