backtop


Print 70 comment(s) - last by navair2.. on Jun 11 at 1:26 AM


  (Source: Bright Side of the News)
Upcoming release should offer an alternative to Sandy Bridge, but will it perform?

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) is sitting pretty with strong graphics card sales and better than expected sales of its lightweight, power efficient fusion CPU+GPU systems on a chip (SoC).  The company is now profitable after years in the red.

Looking to continue its success, AMD previewed [press release] "Scorpius" at the 2011 Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3) at the Los Angeles Convention Center (LACC) in Los Angeles.  Scorpius is AMD's answer for the high-end gaming market.

The design will feature an octacore, unlocked Zambezi processor dubbed "FX", reviving AMD's old enthusiast CPU branding.  Zambezi, codenamed after a river in Africa, is AMD's high performance 32 nm SOI process upcoming desktop CPU based on the company's new Bulldozer architecture.

The new platform will also feature a Radeon 6xxx HD graphics card from AMD and an AMD 9-series chipset motherboard (socket AM3).

Leslie Sobon, AMD's vice president of worldwide product marketing, comments, "AMD’s FX brand will enable an over-the-top experience for PC enthusiasts. By combining an unlocked, native eight-core processor, the latest in chipset technology, and AMD’s latest graphics cards, FX customers will enjoy an unrivalled feature set and amazing control over their PC’s performance."

The obvious competitor of Scorpius will be Intel Corp.'s (INTCSandy Bridge, possibly paired with GeForce 5xx series GPUs from NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA).  With eight physical cores, Scorpius will arguably have the edge over single-socket Intel designs, though, which currently only feature four cores (eight threads).  Intel will bump its core count to six cores in the near future, but it remains to be seen whether that will be enough.

Performance numbers on Bulldozer are still lacking, so it remains to be seen exactly how powerful this octacore gaming rig will be.

One thing that may excite some is AMD's growing array of HD3D partners.  HD3D, AMD's proprietary 3D technology works fully with the company's EyeFinity firmware, which supports up to six displays driven by a single graphics card.

AMD claims over 400 current and upcoming titles support the 3D gaming tech, including, Eidos Montreal's upcoming "Deus Ex: Human Revolution", Bioware's "Dragon Age II", Creative Assembly's "SHOGUN 2: Total War", and Codemasters' "DiRT 3."

Regardless of who comes out on top performance wise, it's refreshing to see a reinvigorated AMD challenging both Intel and NVIDIA in the CPU and GPU sectors.  A competitive market should push all three PC hardware makers to quicken the release of powerful new hardware that will delight PC gamers and enthusiasts -- few as they may be, these days.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Process technology ?
By Belard on 6/7/2011 4:07:26 PM , Rating: 2
FX haven't been $1000 parts (even the dual chip 4X4 crapshoot) since the intel shot out Core2Duo and then held AMD down while kicking them in the nuts for two years.

When it comes to gaming, AMD does okay against the Core i-whatever-the-F-it-is CPUs. Looking at costs, the AMD platform could be $150~300 cheaper, resulting in games getting 80fps vs 90fps with a 2600k. (yeah, this is in general)... I'd rather pocket the money or put it towards an SSD or better graphics card, its about budget and balance.

For general use, AMD Fusion Llano goes up against the i3/i5 CPUs quite well, not a small feat.

These new FX chips MUST be equal to SB in performance, if not better as well as proper price target. An 8X CPU is useless if its still slower than a quad-core SB. And besides gaming, the rendering power of the new CPUs better be good too.

The new Bulldozer CPUs are supposed to easily be faster than AMD's current top tech... with room for even greater performance. Thats all we need.

PS: But obvious, TOP performance isn't everything. The market of low-powered yet powerful CPUs to allow people to check their mail and simple gaming is whats selling like hot-cakes... not $1000 chips.

PS2: AMD's new box art looks HOT. But we need those in our hands today.


RE: Process technology ?
By DandDAddict on 6/7/2011 4:20:47 PM , Rating: 2
1000$ chips as in thats what they were charging for them. Not that they were worth the 1000$.

When c2 came out the fx line pretty much vanished. I want to say the fx-74 was the last one? And up until atleast the fx-60 amd was charging 1000$ per cpu , never mind a 200$ one oced to fx levels easily.

Otherwise i agree with you in general.


RE: Process technology ?
By Targon on 6/7/2011 4:38:59 PM , Rating: 2
What many have missed is that Bulldozer has a new core design, while Llano still uses the K10.5 design used by the current Phenom 2 processors. That is still decent performance for those who would be using an APU with the built-in GPU.

AMD has really been acting as a platform company for a long time now, where the overall performance of CPU+GPU+chipset is more important than having the best in any one area and having garbage for the rest of the system. Low end Intel systems tend to have a LOT of annoying minor problems that you don't see on comparably priced AMD systems, even if the Intel systems are faster at certain tasks.


"The Space Elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing" -- Sir Arthur C. Clarke














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki