backtop


Print 70 comment(s) - last by navair2.. on Jun 11 at 1:26 AM


  (Source: Bright Side of the News)
Upcoming release should offer an alternative to Sandy Bridge, but will it perform?

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) is sitting pretty with strong graphics card sales and better than expected sales of its lightweight, power efficient fusion CPU+GPU systems on a chip (SoC).  The company is now profitable after years in the red.

Looking to continue its success, AMD previewed [press release] "Scorpius" at the 2011 Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3) at the Los Angeles Convention Center (LACC) in Los Angeles.  Scorpius is AMD's answer for the high-end gaming market.

The design will feature an octacore, unlocked Zambezi processor dubbed "FX", reviving AMD's old enthusiast CPU branding.  Zambezi, codenamed after a river in Africa, is AMD's high performance 32 nm SOI process upcoming desktop CPU based on the company's new Bulldozer architecture.

The new platform will also feature a Radeon 6xxx HD graphics card from AMD and an AMD 9-series chipset motherboard (socket AM3).

Leslie Sobon, AMD's vice president of worldwide product marketing, comments, "AMD’s FX brand will enable an over-the-top experience for PC enthusiasts. By combining an unlocked, native eight-core processor, the latest in chipset technology, and AMD’s latest graphics cards, FX customers will enjoy an unrivalled feature set and amazing control over their PC’s performance."

The obvious competitor of Scorpius will be Intel Corp.'s (INTCSandy Bridge, possibly paired with GeForce 5xx series GPUs from NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA).  With eight physical cores, Scorpius will arguably have the edge over single-socket Intel designs, though, which currently only feature four cores (eight threads).  Intel will bump its core count to six cores in the near future, but it remains to be seen whether that will be enough.

Performance numbers on Bulldozer are still lacking, so it remains to be seen exactly how powerful this octacore gaming rig will be.

One thing that may excite some is AMD's growing array of HD3D partners.  HD3D, AMD's proprietary 3D technology works fully with the company's EyeFinity firmware, which supports up to six displays driven by a single graphics card.

AMD claims over 400 current and upcoming titles support the 3D gaming tech, including, Eidos Montreal's upcoming "Deus Ex: Human Revolution", Bioware's "Dragon Age II", Creative Assembly's "SHOGUN 2: Total War", and Codemasters' "DiRT 3."

Regardless of who comes out on top performance wise, it's refreshing to see a reinvigorated AMD challenging both Intel and NVIDIA in the CPU and GPU sectors.  A competitive market should push all three PC hardware makers to quicken the release of powerful new hardware that will delight PC gamers and enthusiasts -- few as they may be, these days.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Hardly something people care about..
By imaheadcase on 6/7/2011 1:58:38 PM , Rating: -1
AMD claims over 400 current and upcoming titles support the 3D gaming tech, including, Eidos Montreal's upcoming "Deus Ex: Human Revolution", Bioware's "Dragon Age II", Creative Assembly's "SHOGUN 2: Total War", and Codemasters' "DiRT 3.""

Let go, its over. Hardly anyone cares about it.

Multimonitor setup's are for work not play, unless you can magically make that bezel disappear from the displays, it will always be a niche market.

Also, just because the game "supports" it, does not mean it takes advantage of it. Simply allowing the display to take advantage is pointless..now if you made it take advantage of the game FEATURES that would be something to consider if you like a certain game a lot.

3 monitiors, good graphics card you might as well just buy one big monitor instead without the drawbacks.




RE: Hardly something people care about..
By JasonMick (blog) on 6/7/2011 2:04:35 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
AMD claims over 400 current and upcoming titles support the 3D gaming tech, including, Eidos Montreal's upcoming "Deus Ex: Human Revolution", Bioware's "Dragon Age II", Creative Assembly's "SHOGUN 2: Total War", and Codemasters' "DiRT 3.""

Let go, its over. Hardly anyone cares about it.

Multimonitor setup's are for work not play, unless you can magically make that bezel disappear from the displays, it will always be a niche market.

Also, just because the game "supports" it, does not mean it takes advantage of it. Simply allowing the display to take advantage is pointless..now if you made it take advantage of the game FEATURES that would be something to consider if you like a certain game a lot.

3 monitiors, good graphics card you might as well just buy one big monitor instead without the drawbacks.

In certain online games I've heard it can provide an advantage -- particularly online games. My information comes largely from a friend of mine who was very passionate about EVE Online, and had a couple allies who swore by multimonitor setups, bezel and all...

Granted I've never tried it myself. Too busy doing real work... :)


RE: Hardly something people care about..
By Drag0nFire on 6/7/2011 4:27:58 PM , Rating: 2
Maximum PC did an article recently about multi-monitor gaming.

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/multiscr...

They tested some pretty wild set ups (3 x 42in TV anyone?) but the conclusion was interesting: For most games, it's a distraction. But for racing games, it was glorious.


RE: Hardly something people care about..
By Mitch101 on 6/7/2011 4:32:45 PM , Rating: 2
For first person shooters its a must have. You can detect someone sneaking up from the side just like your natural peripheral vision. Its not perfect but its damn good.


RE: Hardly something people care about..
By imaheadcase on 6/8/2011 9:06:59 AM , Rating: 2
Not really. You should read up on eye trails. The more space you have the more you have to move eyes. It does not increase more you see, it increases screen space.

Oh and yes you do notice the bezels on the monitors when playing.


By Mitch101 on 6/8/2011 10:36:41 AM , Rating: 2
I play everything I can in triple screens its fine. If your not your missing out.


By kattanna on 6/7/2011 4:33:19 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
My information comes largely from a friend of mine who was very passionate about EVE Online, and had a couple allies who swore by multimonitor setups, bezel and all...


thats because in EVE online, your playing multiple accounts at once

;>)

one account is flying an orca, while the other 2 accounts are flying hulks. it makes for a one person belt stripper LOL

also, flying 2 battleships at once for mission running.. 3 was just too much LOL


By imaheadcase on 6/8/2011 9:02:35 AM , Rating: 2
But with the games that support other things in gameplay, you can also do with a separate monitor. No need for any "tech" just plug and play.

AMD is pretty much just making it seem like you need it for other things.

Supreme commander you could watch map on one monitor and game on 2nd. That is useful. Now if more games did that..multimonitor gaming would be mainstream.

P.S you might as well remove the "voting" for comments. It really serves no purpose.



By navair2 on 6/11/2011 1:26:02 AM , Rating: 2
Heh...if you can put up with the griefers and @sshats in the game, Eve Online is a graphics fiesta that has only gotten better looking over its 8 years of run-time.

I no longer play, but it's definitely something to be viewed over multi displays...;)

"Booster Terrik"


RE: Hardly something people care about..
By jackstar7 on 6/7/2011 2:06:09 PM , Rating: 2
With the right games, the bezels do disappear. It's immersive and enjoyable. Sorry if your experiences were weak, but my setup brings me a lot of enjoyment.

It's almost like YMMV! *gasp*


RE: Hardly something people care about..
By Mitch101 on 6/7/2011 4:30:45 PM , Rating: 2
Im with your Its awesome and significantly more enjoyable and immersible. Its also significantly improved my gameplay ability.

Triple Monitor widescreen gaming is NOT the same as a single Big screen. With Triple screen gaming you have a much wider field of view. With a large single screen its like wearing binders with a limited field of view.

Multiple monitors are more natural like peripheral vision.

I overlap the monitor bezels to minimize it but overall there is no missing information behind the bezels its not like a car where the divider between the windshield and side widow can cover an area.


RE: Hardly something people care about..
By Targon on 6/7/2011 7:23:30 PM , Rating: 2
You can combine these ideas if you could get a single display that had the super high resolutions that Eyefinity 3 or 6 monitor can provide. The real problem is that 1920x1080 is 1920x1080, no matter how large the screen is.


By Mitch101 on 6/8/2011 10:38:52 AM , Rating: 2
I play at 5760x1080. You need an ATI card with 3 or more monitors connected for you game to provide you with the higher resolution options.


RE: Hardly something people care about..
By Assimilator87 on 6/7/2011 2:07:19 PM , Rating: 2
Just because you don't use it doesn't mean other people don't. Can't stand bezels? Use projectors, problem solved. Also, Eyefinity allows 24x the pixels of a single display, so unless you know of some magic uber display, that's not a substitute.


By MrTeal on 6/7/2011 2:09:34 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Use projectors, problem solved. Also, Eyefinity allows 24x the pixels of a single display, so unless you know of some magic uber display, that's not a substitute.


How do you figure?


RE: Hardly something people care about..
By Digimonkey on 6/7/2011 2:40:32 PM , Rating: 2
Eyefinity's max resolutino is 7680x3200, which equates to 24 megapixels. Is that what you were thinking of?


RE: Hardly something people care about..
By therealnickdanger on 6/7/2011 3:43:55 PM , Rating: 2
That's probably what he meant to say. The vast majority of displays in use around the world are in the 720p range, at least that's the most commonly USED resolution.

My only experience with multi-monitor gaming was a 3-way setup. Odd numbers seem to be the only way to go, at least for shooters, as losing the reticule is simply not an option. Personally, I'm just fine with a single monitor with super high resolution.


RE: Hardly something people care about..
By Targon on 6/7/2011 4:31:18 PM , Rating: 2
That "super high resolution" is the problem. Displays that go over 1920x1080 or 1920x1200 tend to be VERY expensive, so the less expensive solution is to go with Eyefinity. With one main display in front, and the two angled on the left and right, you get the super high resolution. Since these 23 inch displays take up the center of your field of view, you have a natural edge to your vision. Peripheral vision will let those two side displays do the job they are there for, giving you a greater field of view.

The second row of displays(above) is where many won't see much value in from a gaming perspective, though there may be games/situations that would make that useful as well.

I'd prefer to see large displays with higher resolutions, but three 1920x1080 displays is less expensive than one display that provides a 5760x1080(if one were ever made).


RE: Hardly something people care about..
By ddownes on 6/7/2011 5:30:08 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The second row of displays(above) is where many won't see much value in from a gaming perspective, though there may be games/situations that would make that useful as well.


dogfights


RE: Hardly something people care about..
By Captain Orgazmo on 6/7/2011 6:53:36 PM , Rating: 2
Track IR and 1 big monitor beats any multi setup for flight sim games... if only they would make some decent ones nowadays.


RE: Hardly something people care about..
By Hyperion1400 on 6/8/2011 4:32:57 PM , Rating: 2
Somebody hasn't played Wings of Prey ;)


By Captain Orgazmo on 6/9/2011 8:51:53 PM , Rating: 2
I have, 10 minutes at a time between connection losses or game crashes ;)


By ClownPuncher on 6/7/2011 2:07:13 PM , Rating: 2
The bezel doesn't make it a niche product, the expense does. You definitely don't notice the bezel when gaming.

The drawback of 1 monitor would be the lower resolution.

There are plenty who care about it, otherwise there would be no WSGF or [H].


By Granseth on 6/7/2011 2:08:08 PM , Rating: 2
It's good to see you are living up to your name.

If you read it again you will see that there are over 400 titles that supports 3D gaming, and that if you somehow have 6 3D monitors you can even use the 3d with eyefinity.

So this is mostly about 3D, not about multiple monitors.


RE: Hardly something people care about..
By icemansims on 6/7/2011 2:36:25 PM , Rating: 2
Actually, the best game I've played with multi-monitor was EVE online. The real estate provided by 5760 x 1080 gives you lots of room for menus, readouts, etc. without impairing your view of your surroundings nearly as much. The bezels are there, yes, but it's like the door posts in a car. One monitor is the equivalent of a windshield, the two ancillary ones like your side windows. Or, if you prefer, looking through a large window or sliding glass door.


By cokbun on 6/7/2011 10:40:42 PM , Rating: 2
whay cant just someone make a single monitor with double or triple width for gaming, you hear that samsung,dell,lg ??


"There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere." -- Isaac Asimov














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki