backtop


Print 84 comment(s) - last by JW.C.. on May 29 at 3:57 AM


  (Source: Lockheed Martin)
After ten years and billions invested some in the Senate want alternatives to F-35

It's well known that the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) has turned into the most costly weapons program in history for the armed forces. When complete, multiple branches of the armed forces will use the F-35 and it will be sold abroad to allies.

The problem for some in Washington is that the delays in delivering the aircraft are mounting, as are the costs to build and maintain the aircraft over its lifespan. The F-35 program has been going for ten years now and some in the Senate Armed Services Committee are now indicating it's time to start looking for a backup plan. Most will find little sense in considering an alternative to the F-35 when it is finally so close to completion.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said, "It seems to me [prudent that] we at least begin considering alternatives."

The reason some in the Senate want to start looking for alternatives is the report published last week showing the costs to maintain the F-35 through 2065 spiraling to $1 trillion. Top acquisition official Ashton Carter has maintained that the $1 trillion figure will be reduced when he completes a "should-cost" review of the F-35 in the next few months. Carter is aiming at a 20% to 50% reduction in that $1 trillion figure.

Christine Fox, Director of the Pentagon cost assessment and program evaluation office, is skeptical of the cost reduction goals.

Fox said, "O&S [operation and sustainment] is hard. Whether we can get it all the way down to legacy [O&S cost levels] is something that I in my office doubt.” Fox points to the cost of fuel being hard to reduce over the life of the aircraft.

Lockheed Martin's general manager for the F-35 program, Tom Burbage, says that the sustainment costs for the F-35 can’t be fairly compared to the costs of older aircraft. He says that the F-35 was developed on performance-based logistics plan that is different from legacy sustainment process. He also notes that the F-35 O&S estimates are susceptible to ground rules legacy aircraft are not bound to.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

F22
By tng424 on 5/23/2011 4:35:17 PM , Rating: 3
I'm not in the US and I'm not involved with the aircraft industry but in shipbuilding. In shipbuilding, in spite of the fact that labour costs are HIGHER in Japan than in the US ( you need to look at total costs per man including social security/ pension costs), Japanese shipbuilding costs are about half what they are in the US. This is largely down to superior management expertise. When we look at Korean or Chinese costs they are much further ahead still. I cannot imagine that the situation is significantly different in the aircraft industry. Yes, the US is far ahead of the opposition in technology but from where I sit, given the size of the American deficit, you are in danger of doing to yourselves what Reagan managed to do to the Soviets, getting them to spend themselves to death. Having the best aircraft is not the same as having the most effective airforce given that money, even in the US, does not grow on trees. The only winner out of this is Lockheed Martin.




RE: F22
By FITCamaro on 5/23/11, Rating: 0
“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki