Print 84 comment(s) - last by JW.C.. on May 29 at 3:57 AM

  (Source: Lockheed Martin)
After ten years and billions invested some in the Senate want alternatives to F-35

It's well known that the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) has turned into the most costly weapons program in history for the armed forces. When complete, multiple branches of the armed forces will use the F-35 and it will be sold abroad to allies.

The problem for some in Washington is that the delays in delivering the aircraft are mounting, as are the costs to build and maintain the aircraft over its lifespan. The F-35 program has been going for ten years now and some in the Senate Armed Services Committee are now indicating it's time to start looking for a backup plan. Most will find little sense in considering an alternative to the F-35 when it is finally so close to completion.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said, "It seems to me [prudent that] we at least begin considering alternatives."

The reason some in the Senate want to start looking for alternatives is the report published last week showing the costs to maintain the F-35 through 2065 spiraling to $1 trillion. Top acquisition official Ashton Carter has maintained that the $1 trillion figure will be reduced when he completes a "should-cost" review of the F-35 in the next few months. Carter is aiming at a 20% to 50% reduction in that $1 trillion figure.

Christine Fox, Director of the Pentagon cost assessment and program evaluation office, is skeptical of the cost reduction goals.

Fox said, "O&S [operation and sustainment] is hard. Whether we can get it all the way down to legacy [O&S cost levels] is something that I in my office doubt.” Fox points to the cost of fuel being hard to reduce over the life of the aircraft.

Lockheed Martin's general manager for the F-35 program, Tom Burbage, says that the sustainment costs for the F-35 can’t be fairly compared to the costs of older aircraft. He says that the F-35 was developed on performance-based logistics plan that is different from legacy sustainment process. He also notes that the F-35 O&S estimates are susceptible to ground rules legacy aircraft are not bound to.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: F22 ?
By FITCamaro on 5/23/2011 2:39:57 PM , Rating: 0
You can thank those who would rather find one more thing to give people "for free" instead of making sure our military is properly outfitted for the future for that.

183 F22s to replace thousands of F15s. We were supposed to buy over 700 originally. Oh and its 182 now since one crashed. I doubt they planned the money to replace it.

RE: F22 ?
By Ushio01 on 5/23/2011 2:57:05 PM , Rating: 2
Er only 1020 F15's were built for the US airforce hardly thousands and some of that number were replacement for attrition.

RE: F22 ?
By FITCamaro on 5/23/2011 5:34:10 PM , Rating: 2
Sorry I forgot to say the F16s as well.

RE: F22 ?
By andre-bch on 5/23/2011 5:55:16 PM , Rating: 2
F-22s aren't supposed to replace F-16s.

RE: F22 ?
By andre-bch on 5/23/2011 3:22:19 PM , Rating: 2
Currently, there are only 267 F-15C/D planes in service.

RE: F22 ?
By yomamafor1 on 5/23/11, Rating: 0
"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki