backtop


Print 26 comment(s) - last by mostyle.. on May 14 at 6:28 AM


  (Source: andrewmccants.com)
As of April 2011, Symantec estimates that almost 100,000 applications were allowing this leakage

It's no secret that Facebook has had some privacy issues in the past. Around this time last year, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg noted that, "people online today just don't have the same expectations of privacy online anymore," to which many disagreed.

Now, Symantec has announced that the personal information of Facebook users may have been leaked accidentally to third parties over the last few years.

"We estimate that as of April 2011, close to 100,000 applications were enabling this leakage," said Symantec in its official blog. "Over the years, hundreds of thousands of applications may have inadvertently leaked millions of access tokens to third parties."

According to Symantec, the third parties were advertisers that would have had access to user information like photographs, chat and profiles. They could even post messages if they wanted to. But Symantec also added that third parties might not have even known that they were able to access the sensitive information. 

Of course, Facebook didn't take these claims lying down. Facebook spokeswoman Malorie Lucich released a statement saying that Symantec's accusations disregarded the "contractual obligations of advertisers and developers," which restricts them from acquiring or spreading this information in a way that infringe on Facebook policy. She also noted that Facebook has removed the outdated Application Programming Interface (API) that Symantec had mentioned.

"Unfortunately, their (Symantec's) resulting report has a few inaccuracies," said Lucich. "Specifically, we have conducted a thorough investigation which revealed no evidence of this issue resulting in a user's private information being shared with unauthorized third parties."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Of course that information's being leaked.
By xti on 5/11/2011 10:52:05 AM , Rating: 2
To be fair:

- I have no expectation of privacy anymore...well I just never cared to be honest.
- I would exploit you for money. Just being honest.
- I cannot be the only one.


RE: Of course that information's being leaked.
By 91TTZ on 5/11/2011 10:58:25 AM , Rating: 2
You would care if you were more aware of the situations which go on around you. Of course, it's easy to put your head in the sand and pretend that you're not affected by things which you're not aware of. You're the perfect end user, an unaware cash crop waiting to be harvested.

You may have a willingness to exploit others for money, but due to the aforementioned point it sounds like others will find it much easier to exploit you.

Don't feel bad about it; prey animals always outnumber predators so you're in good company.


RE: Of course that information's being leaked.
By FaceMaster on 5/11/2011 11:15:46 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
You would care if you were more aware of the situations which go on around you. Of course, it's easy to put your head in the sand and pretend that you're not affected by things which you're not aware of. You're the perfect end user, an unaware cash crop waiting to be harvested.


My God, you just copied that from an article on global warming, didn't you?


RE: Of course that information's being leaked.
By 91TTZ on 5/11/2011 11:21:50 AM , Rating: 2
No.


By therealnickdanger on 5/11/2011 11:37:25 AM , Rating: 3
What exactly are "they" going to do with my information? Send me coupons? Market better products to me? Try to sell me things that I like?

FFS


RE: Of course that information's being leaked.
By 91TTZ on 5/11/2011 1:34:14 PM , Rating: 2
If your email or phone number is listed in your profile, I can see you getting increased spam or telemarketing phone calls.


By therealnickdanger on 5/11/2011 2:28:25 PM , Rating: 2
Hence:

donotcall.gov
optoutprescreen.com
http://consumerist.com/2008/03/8-ways-to-opt-out-o...

Fixed.


RE: Of course that information's being leaked.
By 91TTZ on 5/11/2011 3:01:29 PM , Rating: 2
I'm signed up to the do not call list and I still get calls.


By therealnickdanger on 5/11/2011 3:59:30 PM , Rating: 2
You're doing it wrong.


RE: Of course that information's being leaked.
By MrBlastman on 5/11/2011 4:03:01 PM , Rating: 2
I refuse to sign up for donotcall out of the principle of the idea. It adds just another layer of Government beaurocracy and oversight to our Country.

If I get solicitation calls--if I'm not interested, I tell them so and they leave me alone. Usually.


By MrBlastman on 5/11/2011 4:04:14 PM , Rating: 2
I can has fail spelling.

bu·reauc·ra·cy


By mostyle on 5/14/2011 6:28:11 AM , Rating: 2
I'll respond to each:

1) Sadly I agree. I suspect my opinion is not a popular one but I believe firmly that privacy was waived inadvertently the first time you made a net presence.. Be it an email, credit card transaction, or read an email. We assume much in today's society. Now by no means to I mean to imply that I agree with Zuckerberg that we shouldn't expect it I just feel given where we're at with technology you can't assume any privacy.

2) Thanks for your honesty.. Doesn't negate you being greedy as all hell though. :)

3) You aren't. World's full of you. Spammers, Politicians, and televangelists to name a few.


"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki