Print 43 comment(s) - last by drewsup.. on May 11 at 4:45 PM

BYD e6 electric taxis  (Source: Motor Trend)

BYD F3DM plug-in hybrid

Automaker Great Wall hopes to soon bring an all-electric variant of its Hover SUV to Chinese consumers
China says it will be happy to spend $13B USD to put half a million EVs on its streets by 2015

In contrast with China's plans for high-speed rail, which call for a massive $1T USD project that dwarfs plans in the United States, China's electric vehicle (EV) hopes fall far short compared to its U.S. peers.

I.  China -- the Perfect Home for EVs, But Little Progress

China seems like the perfect place for EVs – it has hundreds of millions of people living in dense urban areas with short commutes.  But thus far the nation has lagged in the development of EV technology.

The country has finally unveiled a decisive plan to turn the corner with EV deployment.  Dubbed the New Energy Vehicle Development plan, it aims to spend $15B USD between now and 2020 to push EVs and hybrid electric vehicles on the streets of China.

That expense still falls short of $25B USD that the U.S. has spent on EVs, and the $10B extra the Obama administration has called for to be spent over the next several years.

The goals of China's plan are scaled down as well.  Obama hopes to have 1 million plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles (PHEV and BEV) on the street by 2015 (the 2016 model year), while China only hopes to have 500,000.  China also estimates it will have 1 million hybrids -- which would still be far less than the 1.89 million hybrids that are currently on U.S. streets.  

The discrepancy between these figures becomes even greater when you consider China has a population of 1.33 billion people, over four times the U.S. population of 307 million people.  China, whose people make far less per capita than U.S. citizens, has a slightly lower per-capita vehicle purchase rate.  In 2010 U.S. citizens bought around 10 million vehicles [source], versus around 18 million in China.

By 2020 China hopes to have 5 million EVs (PHEVs and BEVs) deployed.

II.  What's in a Mandate?  Similarities and Differences Between U.S. and Chinese Plans

In many ways the U.S. and Chinese EV investments are similar despite differences of scale.  In both cases a heavy chunk of the money went directly to research.  In China's case half of the funds -- $7.5B USD -- would go towards R&D.  

The rest of the money from China's plan would be employed towards buyer tax credits (similar to those in the U.S.) and towards building charger stations.  

The Chinese tax credits may be even greater than those offered in the U.S.  According to those familiar with China's plan, it would include large-scale pilot projects, which would hand out over $15,000 USD to EV buyers in target regions.

China wants to build 36,000 charging stations in the capital city of Beijing in the next three years and pilot-scale projects in 25 other major Chinese cities.  That's slightly more ambitious than Obama's proposed 20,000 charging stations by 2015.

China's proposal is also unique in a couple of other ways.  While more limited than the U.S. plan in some regards, the Chinese plan enjoys nearly unanimous support from Chinese lawmakers, where as the U.S. government remains divided on the topic of EVs (with Democrats largely supporting research spending/incentives on EVs and Republicans mostly opposing such expenses).

Additionally the Chinese plan would deny U.S., Japanese, European, and South Korean automakers/battery companies the ability to get government funding or tax credits.  By contrast the U.S. government has handed out tax credits to foreign automakers like Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. (7201) and Mitsubishi Corp. (8058) for their EVs and battery research and development grants to Compact Power, Inc., a Michigan-based subsidiary of South Korean chemical giant LG Chem, Ltd. (051910)

China hopes that by giving local players a decisive edge, it will foster two to three strong battery production/design firms, and three to five electric vehicle manufacturers.

The nation has a decisive advantage over its western peers in resources.  It controls 97 percent of the world's rare earth metal supply.  EVs and hybrids use significantly more rare earth metals (such as neodymium) than standard automobiles.  While China has pumped up prices of rare earth metals amid increasing foreign demand, it hopes to turn around and offer these resources to local manufacturers at dirt-cheap prices.

Other rare compounds like lithium are also heavily controlled and/or produced by China, furthering this edge.

Oliver Hazimeh, a partner at PRTM, a Waltham, Mass.-based consulting firm that recently did a study on China's EV push for World Bank states in a Detroit News interview, "Where they're ahead is at the political commitment level.  The Chinese government is very strongly behind electrification, and they also have the raw materials."

Michael Dunne, president of Hong Kong investment advisory firm Dunne & Co. comments that the Chinese government's plan has little to do with helping the government, and far more to handing energy control to the Chinese government.  States Mr. Dunne, "It's 90 percent about energy security, and less than 10 percent about the environment."

III. Companies Step up to the Plate, but Quality, Government Issues Loom

China has several rising stars in the EV industry, including some fresh faces.  

Among those is BYD, Ltd., subsidiary of BYD Comp. (1233).  BYD made a splash at the 2011 North American International Auto Show (NAIAS) in January and hopes to sell EVs in North America and Europe sometime next year.  Some are skeptical of BYD's capabilities -- while the company has delivered 40 operational BYD e6 taxi prototypes to the city of Shenzhen, the mass-produced international model is two years late.

Great Wall Motor Co., Ltd. (2333) China's largest SUV maker plans to release an electric model of its popular "Great Wall" SUV.  

Beijing Automotive Industry Holding Comp. Ltd. (BAIC), a state-owned automaker who recently purchased the intellectual property of GM subsidiary Saab, is planning an EV of its own, dubbed BAIC C30 (not to be confused with the similarly named Volvo).  BAIC only will produce 3,500 EVs this year, but hopes to be pumping out 150,000 yearly by 2015.  

Jianghuai Automobile Comp., another state run player based in Heifei, hopes to be pumping out 100,000 EVs by 2015.

And the Riich subsidiary of another gov't owned company -- Cherry Automobile -- is planning to release a compact dubbed the M1-EV.  Riich has already released an EV dubbed the S18, which has seen limited sales in China.

Fears about corruption and quality control issues are looming, though, much like with China's high-speed rail project.  These concerns are particularly troublesome among the government-owned automakers.  Zotye Holding Group (ZHG), another government owned carmaker was embarrassed when a car in its electric taxi test fleet caught fire in the city of Hangzhou.  Hu Jiangyi, deputy sales director of State Grid Corp. who operates the company, states, "The incident caused huge damage to us."

ZHG Chairman, Wu Jianzhong promises that his company will install monitoring systems to watch for similar incidents in the future.

There's another major elephant in the room when it comes to China's EV plans -- China's oil subsidies.  In recent years the nation's payments to oil companies to keep gas cheap have exceed even the substantial tax breaks handed out by the U.S. government.  In the U.S. gas is currently well over $4 USD/gallon on average, while Chinese drivers enjoy a sweet price of $2.60 USD/gallon.

Thus while China would like to convince its people to buy EVs, it may find that its own meddling with oil prices is derailing those hopes.  In that regard Chinese automakers may find that their most lucrative market is not in China, but overseas, in the U.S.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: 15B USD in China vs 25B USD in US
By Pirks on 5/9/2011 2:28:04 PM , Rating: 1
They will poop out much more crap than the US for sure, that's all they can do.

I'm saying this after fixing shoddily built Chinese SanDisk Sansa Clip+ which had piece of crap solder joints on the headphone socket that fell apart after ONE MONTH of buying it BRAND NEW.

I'm saying this after spending a few days on fixing the shoddily built Chinese Crystalyte Infineon-based e-bike controller who was designed by some shoddily produced by defective-DNA-spreading mom and pop Chinese brain dead "engineer" idiot with ZERO protection against vibration. My previous controller, BRAND NEW, fell apart because of the vibration after ONE YEAR OF USING IT on my e-bike.

Now I spent considerable resources and my time on protecting it from vibration, resoldering it all over again and using thermal glue as a vibroinsulator everywhere and rubber and silicon parts instead of shoddily built defective Chinese crap they put inside. Now this thing should last for a few years I'm sure.

Don't buy defective Chinese crap, consider yourself warned.

I know I sound just like Beenthere but it was on purpose. I am really fed up with this shoddy Chinese excreta they call "manufactured goods". I'm so fed up with it.

I don't want to tell you the story of my two LiFePO4 Chinese batteries I've bought a couple of years ago for my e-bike, I can't talk about them 'cause I start crying and can't type anymore... it's beyond words...

RE: 15B USD in China vs 25B USD in US
By FITCamaro on 5/9/11, Rating: 0
RE: 15B USD in China vs 25B USD in US
By Gzus666 on 5/9/11, Rating: 0
RE: 15B USD in China vs 25B USD in US
By Solandri on 5/9/2011 4:08:54 PM , Rating: 3
Stop being stupid, lead doesn't make a better connection. Lead was added because of something they call "tin whiskers" and a lower melting point.

Lead also contributes to the flexibility of a solder joint.

So yeah, lead-free solder could have contributed to the problem. But lead-free solder has been required for long enough that any manufacturer should long-since have adapted their manufacturing to eliminate any problems with failing solder joints.

RE: 15B USD in China vs 25B USD in US
By Gzus666 on 5/9/11, Rating: 0
By Keeir on 5/9/2011 5:04:38 PM , Rating: 3
I would say expansion of materials due to thermal/electrical issues definately places stress of sodder.

This can be designed for of course... primarily by using more lead-free sodder than leaded sodder... its just an issue of companies not wanting to spend the extra cost to make the transition iso-quality rather than iso-cost.

RE: 15B USD in China vs 25B USD in US
By Pirks on 5/9/11, Rating: -1
By Gzus666 on 5/9/2011 5:37:57 PM , Rating: 4
Wow that is hard to read, it is like a text message from a teenage girl. Anyway, moral of the story is don't buy something "engineered" by the Chinese.

By xrodney on 5/11/2011 5:10:34 AM , Rating: 2
You would be surprised how much effect temperature change and vibration can have on soldering.
Difference between Lead and Lead free solder is not only in Lead adding better flexibility, but also better soldering contact between materials which is given by longer soldering time at lower temperature. There is only limited thermal capacity that soldered components can accept before they get affected or even damaged and that capacity is defined by temperature and time. When you have longer time for soldering it allows each contact to be better heated and that create more uniform and durable connection.

By YashBudini on 5/9/2011 6:31:16 PM , Rating: 2
The same thing is accomplished with lead free solder. Christ, have you even soldered with lead vs non-lead solder?

If you hang around here long enough he will at some point blame solar flares on the political party he despises so much.

One wonders if such people can recall a time without hatred.

By YashBudini on 5/9/2011 7:19:18 PM , Rating: 3
You can largely thank the idiots who forced lead out of solder for those crappy connections.

Wouldn't that be the ultimate irony? If everything coming out of China has lead in it except the solder?

By Spuke on 5/9/2011 3:50:56 PM , Rating: 2

RE: 15B USD in China vs 25B USD in US
By JediJeb on 5/9/2011 4:01:12 PM , Rating: 4
Don't buy defective Chinese crap, consider yourself warned.

I want to say it, I want to say it... but I will not name that company who charges too much for their stuff made in China.

By Pirks on 5/9/2011 4:11:49 PM , Rating: 2
Motoman, is that you?

By Hieyeck on 5/10/2011 8:35:07 AM , Rating: 2
Nah, Apple won't let it's Chinese manufacturers make defective products. The Chinese make it to spec. The defective part starts in Cupertino.

"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki