Print 11 comment(s) - last by Kiffberet.. on May 6 at 8:56 AM

  (Source: Markus Waibel, Dario Floreano, Laurent Keller)

Robots with the ability to evolve quickly show that robots within the same family tend to share more with closer relatives than with distant relatives or strangers

Researchers from École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) and the Université de Lausanne in Switzerland have used simple robots to study the evolution of altruism in social animals. 

Dario Floreano, study leader and EPFL robotics professor, and Laurent Keller, a biologist from the Université de Lausanne, have joined forces to study how altruism came about in social creatures that were born to understand "survival of the fittest."

Altruism is the selfless concern for the welfare of others. It is demonstrated in animals like worker ants, which are sterile and give up the transmission of their own genes in order to guarantee the survival of the queen's genetic makeup. This type of altruism is known as kin selection, where the individual makes personal sacrifices in order to insure the survival of a relative's genetic code. 

In 1964, a biologist named W.D. Hamilton proposed that if an individual member shares food with its family, it decreases its own survival yet increases the chance of survival for family members that can pass along family genes. Hamilton's rule of kin selection states that an organism is more likely to share its food with another that is genetically close rather than those who are not.  

Floreano and Keller began experimenting with this theory using robots. In previous studies, the robots would perform simple tasks like pushing seed-like objects across the floor to specific destinations. The robots would evolve over several generations, and those that could not push the objects to the correct destination were pulled from the study, unable to pass their code along. On the other hand, robots that were able to perform the desired task were allowed to pass their code on, and this code was mutated and recombined with other robots in the next generation. 

Now, Floreano and Keller are testing the evolution of altruism through the use of robots that evolve quickly. The robots are able to evolve through the use of simulated gene and genome functions. Some robots are created as clones, siblings, cousins, and complete strangers. The difference between this new study and the older ones is that robots now have the option to share a seed once it is pushed to the desired destination. Over the course of 500 generations of experiments, the researchers observed when robots would share, when they wouldn't, and what the consequences were for both options. 

The results of the study showed that Hamilton's rule of kin selection was exactly right. Groups of robots that were related shared the seed, and the family became strong and was able to pass its code to the next generation. Hamilton's original theory takes into account both a limited and isolated vision of gene interaction while these gene simulations in robots "integrate effects of one gene in multiple other genes," and Hamilton's theory was still correct. 

"We have been able to take this experiment and extract an algorithm that we can use to evolve cooperation in any type of robot," said Floreano. "We are using this altruism algorithm to improve the control system of our flying robots and we see that it allows them to effectively collaborate and fly in swarm formation more successfully."  

This study was published in PLoS Biology.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Robots needed ?
By kensiko on 5/5/2011 8:01:40 AM , Rating: 2
Do they need to make robots just to test that ?

They could simulate everything within a computer. It's just code !

RE: Robots needed ?
By kontorotsui on 5/5/2011 8:14:49 AM , Rating: 2
Indeed it is pretty useless.
You don't even need a computer simulation, it can and has been demonstrated with math and logic, and simple natural observation.

It is like demonstrating how gravity works by throwing rocks around: yes, it works as expected, so what?

Can be a very useful experiment to teach students these laws, but there is no scientific value in it.

RE: Robots needed ?
By AnnihilatorX on 5/5/2011 8:24:40 AM , Rating: 3
I think the goal was not demostrate alturism, which has little academic value.
Investigating the processes which give rise of alturism in AI programs will have academic value.

RE: Robots needed ?
By GuinnessKMF on 5/5/2011 2:00:20 PM , Rating: 2
I think the goal was to have a study with robots in it so that it would make a good headline and they would be more likely to get delicious, delicious funding.

RE: Robots needed ?
By ct760ster on 5/6/2011 1:25:12 AM , Rating: 2
Because if you forfeit your right to past a genetic legacy you're actually stopping evolution by extinction. In an unnatural system like the human society maybe we see this like an advantage and virtue, but in the real nature without too much thinking this is only a mechanism inherent to parenting to promote the survival of the offspring. Bear in mind this coming Sunday is Mother's Day as she is the bearing of all life. Congratulations to all of hers.

RE: Robots needed ?
By granma on 5/5/11, Rating: 0
RE: Robots needed ?
By Stuka on 5/5/2011 12:46:02 PM , Rating: 5
God made them on the 16th Day. As written in the Ultra Testament, under Neon Genesis 32:12.

RE: Robots needed ?
By foolsgambit11 on 5/5/2011 7:14:11 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed. And what's more important, the actual code they used makes a huge impact on the viability of this study. How did the robots know which other robots were related to it, and how closely related they were? Did this code actually include an altruistic subroutine, and they demonstrated the results of its expression? Or did the altruism arise totally spontaneously from the experiment? What amount of mutation was involved between generations, and how often did that result in non-contributing group members?

Additionally, an experiment like this (though it would be easier if simply run as a simulation) should answer some questions which weren't discussed in this article. How often was altruism displayed? What level of altruism resulted in the most viable gene groups? A high level of altruism would allow genetically weak members to 'pollute' the gene pool, while a lower level would reduce the total size of the gene pool, so where exactly was the happy medium that produced the 'best' group (based on any of several criteria)?

RE: Robots needed ?
By Kiffberet on 5/6/2011 8:45:06 AM , Rating: 2
What about the selfish robots? Why were they taken out? Surely if all the robots were altruistic and then a selfish one was added (through mutation), then the selfish one would flurish (taking all the food etc), and pass it's genes on.
Eventually only selfish robots would exist, but then they'll suffer because of their nature. A altruist/selfish hybrid would evolve, which can punish selfish robots as well as dumb ass altruists.

“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs
Related Articles
Scientist Creates Evolutionary Robots
January 21, 2011, 11:01 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki