backtop


Print 44 comment(s) - last by drewidgho5t.. on May 3 at 6:30 PM

Porsche's turbodiesel can't fix ugly

Porsche continues to expand its lineup by introducing more fuel-efficient models. The company has already introduced diesel and hybrid versions of its Cayenne crossover. Likewise, the company's news nameplate, the Panamera, will soon be available in hybrid form.

Today, however, Porsche has officially revealed the newest member of the family: the Panamera Diesel. The Panamera Diesel uses a more powerful version of the VW Group 3.0-liter V6 turbodiesel that is used in the Cayenne. In this application, it generates 250hp at 3,800 rpm and 405 lb-ft of torque at a low 1,750 rpm.

Those wishing to row your own gears will have to look elsewhere -- the Panamera Diesel can only be had with Porsche's 8-speed Tiptronic S transmission.

Porsche says that the Panamera Diesel can sprint to 60 mph in a respectable 6.8 seconds and has a top speed of 150 mph. The vehicle is rated at a U.S. equivalent 36.2 mpg on the European Cycle. As a result, Porsche's long-distance cruiser can travel a whopping 744 miles thanks to its generous 21-gallon fuel tank. 

While the powertrain is new in the Panamera, the styling hasn't change one bit. In fact, about the only thing that will alert pedestrians to the turbodiesel lurking within are the "Diesel" badges on the front doors. Otherwise, the Panamera’s family resemblance up front and dreadful backend/hatchback area remain.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Did you hear that?
By bah12 on 5/2/2011 2:10:15 PM , Rating: 2
I agree, the one living in the 1960's is the guy that thinks a heavier 4 door cannot also handle well. This one, the CTS-V, M5, and many more have proven this many times.

Don't believe me take this link as an example. Heck the CTS-V alone has bested a LOT of smaller lighter cars. Even beating the much lighter Honda 2000 by almost a full minute, as well as besting even the more modern Boxster S and Skyline. Albeit these are hardly true apples to apples runs, but my point is a heavier car does not mean bad handling one if engineered right.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N%C3%BCrburgring_lap_...


RE: Did you hear that?
By Jeffk464 on 5/2/2011 3:24:47 PM , Rating: 2
True, but you need a whole lot better tire grip to pull it off. Weight is the enemy of performance.


RE: Did you hear that?
By Spuke on 5/2/2011 4:37:13 PM , Rating: 2
Considering the weight, the tires on the CTS-V aren't all that aggressive or wide for that matter. Just some Michelin PS2's. Nothing you wouldn't find on other cars of its caliber.


"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki