backtop


Print 24 comment(s) - last by smartalco.. on May 17 at 10:33 AM


Space shuttle Endeavour  (Source: aerospaceguide.net)
Two of NASA's orbiters in the Space Shuttle fleet will now be retired, with the third to make its final launch this summer

Space Shuttle Endeavour, which is one of the last two remaining operational orbiters in the Space Shuttle fleet of NASA, made its final launch today. 

A few months ago, NASA's space shuttle Discovery made its final flight from Cape Canaveral, Florida after 30 years of space travel. Space shuttle's Endeavour and Atlantis are the remaining two operational orbiters in the Space Shuttle fleet of NASA, but now, Endeavour has started the first leg of its final mission. 

Space shuttle Endeavour began construction in 1987 at a price of $2.2 billion. It was completed in May 1991, and embarked on its first space venture in May 1992. In total, space shuttle Endeavour has spent 280 days in space, carried 148 astronauts, and traveled 166,003,247 km at this point. It has completed 24 missions total -- its 25th mission will be its last

The Endeavour's commander will be Cmdr. Mark Kelly. Kelly's wife, U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, who suffered a gunshot wound to the head in the Tuscon, Arizona mass shooting three months ago, will be in attendance today.

Kelly's crew consists of pilot Gregory H. Johnson, mission specialists Michael Fincke, Andrew Feustel and Greg Chamitoff, and European Space Agency astronaut Roberto Vittori. 

The Endeavour will embark on a 15-day journey through space. Four spacewalks are planned, where experiments will be retrieved, new ones will be placed, parts will be lubricated and tanks will be refilled at the International Space Station 

In addition, the Endeavour is carrying the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, which is a $1.5 billion piece of equipment that captures space particles like dark matter so that scientists can learn more about it. Space walkers will place the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer outside of the International Space Station so it can gather these particles and contribute to our knowledge of our universe. 

Kelly noted that today will be a very emotional day for him, as he fears that it could possibly be his last flight into space.  

"Flying in space is a very difficult thing to give up," said Kelly. "I remember after my last flight thinking, 'Well, maybe this is the last time I'm going to do this.' And you know, you go a couple of months out and you're like, 'Oh, I really hope this is not the end of my flying career.'"

With two of NASA's Space Shuttle fleet orbiters in retirement, and the third expected to make its final launch later this summer, U.S. astronauts are going to have a difficult time going into space unless they utilize Russian rockets.  

"I'll be thinking the same thing, I can't really give this up," said Kelly. "I've got to figure out a way to get back into space."

Space shuttle Endeavour lifted off the launchpad at 8:56 a.m. ET. It was originally supposed to launch on April 29, but a "broken set of heaters" prevented the launch from taking place. 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Too bad...
By yomamafor1 on 5/16/2011 12:35:34 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, because those money are mostly spent on elderly (Medicare, Social Security). What kind of job would those people who's over 65 do, who has spent their entire life time working and contributing to their retirement? Sweeping in Walmart? Is that how we are treating our elderly?


RE: Too bad...
By acer905 on 5/16/2011 1:10:12 PM , Rating: 2
Devils Advocate ~

If they spent their life working and contributing to their retirement, as you so claim, why do they need any gov. assistance? Should not a responsible lifestyle give you a proper retirement? Live a 60/40 lifestyle. live off no more than 60% of your income, put the remaining 40% into savings/investments. Long term, with the right investments you can double your savings.


RE: Too bad...
By maven81 on 5/16/2011 1:28:37 PM , Rating: 2
Social security is not government assistance. You paid into the system, you get the money back. It's also safer then investments because investments can tank, and then what?


RE: Too bad...
By Dorkyman on 5/16/2011 1:49:35 PM , Rating: 3
Not so.

You "don't pay into the system, and then get your money back." Your idea would actually have been a far better mechanism than what they adopted back in FDR's time, because you would literally get the money YOU put in, plus interest.

But FDR chose the weasel's way out. They created a "paygo" system. Your payments have already paid for your senior's retirement. That money is gone. Now, your kids will be paying for your retirement. Literally. The problem is that there are too many seniors, too few kids, and too generous a payout.

And, yes, this invariably devolves into a political discussion because the Dems and Repubs have wildly different ideas.

--Dems say all is hunky-dory. They need those senior votes.

--Repubs say we're going bankrupt, and it needs fixing.

I'm with the Repubs on this one.


RE: Too bad...
By Nfarce on 5/16/2011 9:00:09 PM , Rating: 2
Exactly. SS is nothing but a government-mandated Ponzi scheme. If *any* US investment company ran their business like the federal government runs SS, well, the people running said business would be in jail by said federal government.

Anyone who says SS is an "investment" is clueless. It's a mandatory paycheck deduction and employer matching scheme. We have no rights to do what we want with it and the government has already spent the money we put in it from every single paycheck. Further, in death, unlike say a private retirement account like a Roth IRA, SS cannot be listed in a will and allocated accordingly to heirs.

Finally, it is no coincidence that Democrats are next wishing to tap into said private retirement accounts to fund their social pit fall programs.


RE: Too bad...
By yomamafor1 on 5/16/2011 2:25:13 PM , Rating: 2
Perhaps because of the medical expenses, which everyone knows costs more than an arm and a leg? Or perhaps the fact that they've been educated in consumerism? It still doesn't change the fact that they've been contributing to programs like SS and Medicare for their entire life, and have the full right to enjoy the benefits they've already paid for.


RE: Too bad...
By dgingeri on 5/16/2011 2:45:18 PM , Rating: 2
I have little problem with Social Security. (The numbers were originally formulated to pay back over an average life span of 65. Current life expectancy is higher. Although the retirement age was adjusted up from 60 to 67, you still get back what you paid into it with average interest after only 7 years. That's about the only issue I have with it.) Medicare is slightly worse in that there are far too many managers and bureaucrats to make it cost effective, as with any government entity.

It's the food stamp, farm subsidy, welfare, and the new health care systems I have problems with. There are a great many people who are perfectly capable of working, yet they collect food stamps and welfare. There are many corporate farm companies who are collecting farm subsidies that don't need or deserve them. There are several millionaires, including George Clooney, who own "farm land" and collect millions in subsidies for doing nothing with that land.

Then there's also the problem with federal employee pay. They make, on average, 66% more than private sector employees, and get a full retirement pension while private sector employees have to pay for their own. Throwing the money in for the pension, federal employees make about twice what private sector employees make.
http://www.walletpop.com/2011/04/07/are-federal-em...

On top of that, as we all know from experience, federal employees are notorious for red tape, passing the buck, and doing little to no work much of the time. I have seen a federal records office where the records requests now take a little under 20 minutes to fill, thanks to computerized records, yet they need all 16 employees to fill their 8 requests per average day. I find it even funnier that this office even puts out on their request form that it may take 4 to 6 weeks to fill these requests. (Social Security Disability claims office in the Denver Federal building. I went there to repair a printer.)


"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki