Print 52 comment(s) - last by themaster08.. on Apr 17 at 4:40 AM

  (Source: iPads House)
Brings whole new meaning to the phrase "early adopters"

How young is too young to begin embracing personal computing technology? Are gadgets like smartphones and tablets valid educational tools? Are they worth the cost?

Those questions speak to the heart of a USA Today article, which reports that almost 300 kindergarten students in Auburn, Maine, will be receiving Apple iPad2's next fall along with their chocolate milk and crayons. 

"It’s definitely an adventure, and it’ll be a journey of learning for teachers and students," Auburn kindergarten teacher Amy Heimerl told USA Today.

But not everyone is thrilled about the proposition of spending $200,000 -- the cost Superintendent Tom Morrill plans to incur -- on the high-tech gadgets. "I understand you have to keep up with technology, but I think a 5-year old is a little too young to understand," Auburn mother Sue Millard says in the report.

The superintendent disagreed. "It’s a revolution in education," Morrill said, citing the iPad's hundreds of educational applications and simple-to-use touchscreen. 

Maine has been ahead of the curve when it comes to personal technology in the classroom. It was the first state to distribute laptops (Apple iMacs) to all seventh and eighth graders nearly 10 years ago. The former Maine governor who launched that initiative, Angus King, believes in the iPad program. "If your students are engaged, you can teach them anything," King says in the report. "If they’re bored and looking out the window, you can be Socrates and you’re not going to teach them anything. These devices are engaging."

But Maine is not the first state to give its tots tablets, either. "Schools in Omaha, Neb.; Columbiana, Ohio; Huntington, W. Va.; Paducah, Ky.; Charleston, S.C.; and Scottsdale, Ariz., are among the places where kindergarten pupils are using them," USA Today reports.

"We can’t say whether what the school district in Maine or anywhere else is doing is good or not good," Peter Pizzolongo of the National Association for the Education of Young Children told USA Today, "but what we can say is when the iPad or any other technological tool is used appropriately, then it’s a good thing for children’s learning."

Superintendent Morrill said that most of the criticism of the iPad plan has been of the plan's cost, not about the age-appropriateness. He plans to raise the money "from foundations, the federal government, the local school department, and other sources."

If nothing else, the development is one step closer to Bill Gates' vision of education in the future.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: meh
By FITCamaro on 4/14/2011 10:56:52 AM , Rating: 5
I'd rather them spend the money making sure kids are learning to read, write, add, subtract, divide, and multiply. Since those basic skills seem to escape many school children.

Granted that has to do more with parenting. No amount of money or technology will make for a parent who doesn't make their kid do their homework or study. Of course these days I hear about schools not even giving god damn homework!

RE: meh
By Homerboy on 4/14/2011 11:15:30 AM , Rating: 2
But they do learn to read/write/math/etc.

They aren't going and playing on the laptop/ipads. The sites they are assigned/allowed to use are VERY educational and in-depth. I know it sounds like fluff, and I never really believed it myself until I saw the benefits in my own kids.

RE: meh
By mcnabney on 4/14/2011 11:50:11 AM , Rating: 2
You make a valid point. An iPad is a media consumption device, and a pretty good one at that. As long as the only media/content being consumed on the device is educational it is fine. However, if there are time wasters on there, expect those to be application of choice. Sorry, but three hours of Angry Birds isn't going to help Jr with his math and spelling.

RE: meh
By ImEmmittSmith on 4/14/2011 12:09:02 PM , Rating: 2
It all comes down to the school districts technology plan when they roll out the iPads. My wife's school district in Texas just rolled out the iPads with educational games and programs at her elementary school. It has been well received and the kids enjoy learning on them. Prior to that, they had early 1990's PCs and Macs, which had 5.25 floopy disks(PCs) and 3.5 diskettes(Macs) with very old programs. If schools kept up more with technology our kids would have a better chance of learning something new.
I will leave it at that!

RE: meh
By quiksilvr on 4/14/2011 12:35:21 PM , Rating: 2
I agree, but not with iPads. Just build a desktop for $200 for the kids that they can use at school. Saves hundreds of bucks and you get tons of more functionality (and easy upgrade as technology changes).

There is no reason to spend this much for so few students on a limited platform.

RE: meh
By Solandri on 4/14/2011 1:47:57 PM , Rating: 2
I actually think there is something to this. I had a pen-based tablet computer back before the iPhone came out with its fancy touch interface. I installed a crayon physics simulator on it just for fun.

I let kids play with it a few times, and invariably they would try to grab the objects on the screen with their fingers. It was a chore to get them to use the pen, and even after showing them they had to use the pen they would still try using their fingers.

The mouse and pen are fine for precision work on the computer, stuff that adults do. But on computers for kids I think touch screens are the way to go. I don't know if iPads are long-term the best choice for kids (like you I'm very concerned about the closed computing environment they represent), but there's no denying that it's the reigning king of its market niche right now.

RE: meh
By michael2k on 4/15/2011 6:04:14 AM , Rating: 2
We're talking about 5 year olds here. You really expect a 5 year old learning how to read, write, add, subtract, and be 5 to know how to use a computer?

I'll give you a hint; they won't know how unless exposed to it before the age of 5. Why waste time teaching a 5 year old how to use a computer, in the first place, when they should be reading, writing, etc?

The flip side is that the iPad shortcuts all that. From experience, my kids were using my iPad at the age of 12 months; that's when they could swipe to unlock. By 15 months they were tracing the alphabet and playing letter games (think flashcards and such), and by 2 years they were (poorly, but trying) doing math games.

They couldn't even use a trackpad by 2 because they didn't have the hand-eye coordination to track the mouse pointer since they had to look at their finger to move it. They couldn't use the mouse until 3 because they had to look at their hand to move it. They couldn't use the keyboard until 3 because that's when they started figuring out words and letters.

I fully believe that even so my kids were ahead of the curve because of my iPad; why would they know how to use a trackpad at 2? How could they figure out a mouse at 2? Their physical coordination just didn't exist. Heck, my kids couldn't talk and they could learn the alphabet and sign language and such because of the iPad.

Save your PC centrism for learning to use a mouse, because there isn't anything else you can do on the PC that also isn't available for the iPad. Keyboards, colors, alphabets, animals, sounds, sign language, math, reading, writing, etc are already well represented on iPads, today, and for a quite reasonable pricepoint compared to PC software prices!

RE: meh
By Gzus666 on 4/14/2011 12:12:53 PM , Rating: 2
Of course these days I hear about schools not even giving god damn homework!

Probably for the best. Homework does little to help learning. The old "learn through repetition" method doesn't actually teach you anything but how to do what is in the worksheet. The actual way to learn something is by understanding the concepts, the rest is just applying the concepts, which can be done more abstractly so as not to dig someone into a hole of only knowing how to do what they are shown instead of actually learning. I know someone will try to retort with application vs. concepts, but the reality is if you really understand the concepts, application is fairly easy and any pitfalls you encounter are simple to overcome due to a proper understanding of the concepts.

Basically, unless they are working on a sport or some other menial physical task, repetition doesn't actually teach you anything.

Honestly they need to start teaching logic early on so kids can actually reason things out. I am dumbfounded as to why this is never hit until you get to college as it would make life so much easier (would also make people in general so much easier to deal with, imagine if everyone had a basic understanding of logical axioms).

RE: meh
By FITCamaro on 4/14/2011 2:29:31 PM , Rating: 2
I disagree. If you never practice what you hear in the classroom, you quickly forget it or never fully retain it.

RE: meh
By Gzus666 on 4/14/2011 3:04:34 PM , Rating: 3
Anything backing this up? Most studies I have seen say homework does the opposite, makes them hate the subject and lose interest in learning. This seems on par with what I have seen throughout my schooling.

Remembering a formula or anything like that is useless to memorize unless you use it everyday anyway, that is why the brain cleans it out after periods of no use. As long as you get the concepts, you can easily pick things right back up. I am sure you, like anyone else in any field, looks things up from time to time cause you can't remember everything. I am sure you don't have to relearn it all, you just have to jog your memory and you are off and running. This is the difference between understanding something and memorizing it.

"Folks that want porn can buy an Android phone." -- Steve Jobs
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki