Print 17 comment(s) - last by kenny24000.. on Apr 20 at 6:12 AM

Amazon released a letter to record labels on Monday saying that the Cloud Drive is legal, but is willing to meet with record labels today to discuss licensing rights

After much debate and disapproval regarding Amazon's Cloud Drive, the online retailer is finally meeting with record labels today to discuss licensing rights.

Amazon's Cloud Drive is an internet-based storage application that offers 5 GB of storage free of charge. Users can store music, pictures and documents in the cloud and pull them up on different devices. The Cloud Drive also features a Cloud Player, which is a music streaming application. 

When Amazon first launched the Cloud Player in March of this year, record labels were angered at the fact that Amazon hadn't paid for licensing rights to stream music to its users. According to those in the music industry, Amazon only had licensing rights to sell digital downloads, which may make the new Cloud Drive illegal.

Amazon released a letter to record labels on Monday saying that the Cloud Drive is legal, and even compared it to Microsoft's SkyDrive or Google Docs. The letter also noted that Amazon's Cloud Player is similar to Microsoft's Windows Media Player, and that it had increased sales of digital songs in Amazon's MP3 store. 

Despite Amazon's disagreement with record labels over the legality of the Cloud Drive, the online retail giant is willing to meet with record labels today to discuss licensing rights. 

"We don't publicly discuss our meetings with partners, and we have not announced any changes to Amazon Cloud Drive or Amazon Cloud Player since the launch," said Cat Griffin, an Amazon spokeswoman.  

Record labels are likely eager to meet with Amazon as well since the risk of other companies following in Amazon's footsteps is too great to chance. Other companies could create services like the Cloud Drive, where the music industry is not included in regards to licensing rights. 

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Pivotal moment
By GulWestfale on 4/14/2011 12:56:07 PM , Rating: 0
i agree with you that amazon should not bow down to these organized criminals, but i think that you overestimate the importance of the cloud for music. my phone can hold 16GB of songs, and i can take them with me wherever i go; with a cloud i'd need constant internet access to listen to my music. at home we are networked, with a 1TB drive on the network.... why do we need a cloud? how often do you travel to a hotel and think, 'oh, i wish i really had the complete recordings of the berlin philharmonic ochestra on me right now'?

RE: Pivotal moment
By KentState on 4/14/2011 1:08:04 PM , Rating: 2
The point of the "cloud" is to be device independent. Yes, you can load the same song manually onto your phone, iPod, computer, friends computer, and so on, but that's a lot of manual intervention. The cloud drive allows the music to be stored on one source and accessed from anywhere. If don't want to use your data connection, the cloud app allows you to download the files locally.

RE: Pivotal moment
By bobny1 on 4/14/2011 6:15:14 PM , Rating: 1
you can buy and eat the steak. but pay for every bite you take. Including the fat!

"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki