backtop


Print 19 comment(s) - last by Reclaimer77.. on Apr 13 at 2:45 AM


Microsoft is once again calling out Google over its business practices
Continues to mount ironic campaign against Google's business practices

While perhaps everyone except Microsoft itself sees the irony in this, the company is continuing its public assault on Google and its practices in a new blog post this week.

In a Microsoft on the Issues blog post titled "Google’s misleading security claims to the government raise serious questions", Corporate Vice President & Deputy General Counsel David Howard basically calls Google a liar for touting certification under the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) for its Google Apps for Government. Howard claims that unsealed court documents now prove that the certification was for a different software suite, Google Apps Premier.

"Open competition should involve accurate competition. It’s time for Google to stop telling governments something that is not true," Howard concludes.

Why does Microsoft really care about certification for a software suite for government employees? Well, because Google stepped in when it looked like Microsoft was going to be selected to provide a cloud-based email system to the Department of Interior. Google sued the government, claiming favoritism towards Microsoft by the DoI. Google then tried to sell its Google Apps for Government suite, citing its FISMA certification, which "creates a process for federal agencies to accredit and certify the security of information management systems like e-mail," Howard writes. "FISMA-certification suggests that a particular solution has proven that it has met an adequate level of security for a specific need."

When documents of the legal proceedings were unsealed last week, the Department of Justice brief read: “On December 16, 2010, counsel for the Government learned that, notwithstanding Google’s representations to the public at large, its counsel, the GAO and this Court, it appears that Google’s Google Apps for Government does not have FISMA certification.”

Rather, the General Services Administration (GSA) under FISMA had certified Google Apps Premier for its own use. Meanwhile, Google Apps for Government was still in the process of certification.

"To put it charitably, because of Google’s unwillingness to provide answers, the facts have remained opaque," Howard writes. "As a result of the lawsuit, it looks like we finally are beginning to get some answers.

Comments on Howard's blog post take a generally mocking tone, as someone identified as Kevin sums up: "Is it 'open competition' if only Microsoft products are available for government contracts?" 

Another commenter, identified as Chuck, had this to say: "Microsoft is afraid of Google -- very afraid."

Perhaps fear can also help explain why a company the size of Microsoft, once the principal of a very public antitrust lawsuit in the 1990s, has filed an antitrust complaint against Google in Europe.

Microsoft's lengthy list of complaints against Google in Europe are all summed up in another blog post, which takes note of the irony: 

There of course will be some who will point out the irony in today’s filing. Having spent more than a decade wearing the shoe on the other foot with the European Commission, the filing of a formal antitrust complaint is not something we take lightly. This is the first time Microsoft Corporation has ever taken this step. More so than most, we recognize the importance of ensuring that competition laws remain balanced and that technology innovation moves forward.  

So, because Microsoft was once in Google's position, it learned its lesson and now understands the importance of competition? 

Meanwhile, Google still claims FISMA certification over on the Google Apps for Government webpage.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

how come every time...
By kleinma on 4/12/2011 10:05:53 AM , Rating: 2
every time MS raises some antitrust issue (usually with regards to google) it is called ironic? If a huge corporation keeps getting sued and penalized for antitrust/monopolistic practices, certainly they should be able to say "why just us? look over there at those anticompetitive/mopolistic practices they are doing too.. why just us?"

Google has a monopoly on search
Apple has a monopoly on music
Microsoft has a monopoly on??? Maybe the enterprise, not sure what else at this point...




RE: how come every time...
By FITCamaro on 4/12/2011 10:22:32 AM , Rating: 4
Because Apple and Google are "feel good" companies to the majority of the public while Microsoft is that big greedy group of bastards who only care about stealing your money and raping your mothers.


RE: how come every time...
By raddude9 on 4/12/11, Rating: 0
RE: how come every time...
By ClownPuncher on 4/12/2011 1:46:39 PM , Rating: 2
That was, like, in the 80's, man.


RE: how come every time...
By kleinma on 4/12/2011 5:44:08 PM , Rating: 2
It is not Microsoft's fault that IBM didn't see what it meant to license the software and not buy it outright. As well as the fact that they agreed to allow it to be sold to 3rd parties, which created the massive influx of the IBM clones. I am glad that happened, otherwise we would all be drinking Steve Jobs koolaid...


RE: how come every time...
By Reclaimer77 on 4/13/2011 2:45:11 AM , Rating: 2
IBM didn't see the big picture. They thought computers would be a luxury and always cost 6+ grand like they were at the time.

Gates saw a future where EVERYONE could enjoy the personal computer.


"DailyTech is the best kept secret on the Internet." -- Larry Barber

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki