Print 29 comment(s) - last by Master Kenobi.. on Apr 1 at 9:08 PM

Google appears to be on a quest for world dominance, and Microsoft is ready to stick its foot out to trip up those efforts.
Once the focus of antitrust complaints itself, Microsoft sets its targets on Google

The tables -- or in Microsoft's case, chairs -- can turn quickly in the technology sector. It was just over a decade ago that Microsoft found itself under close scrutiny for monopolistic behavior with its Windows operating system and Internet Explorer web browser. Now, the Redmond, Washington-based company is crying foul over Google's dominance in the search market (among other areas).

Microsoft has filed an official complaint with the European Commission against Google, saying that the Mountain View, California-based internet giant is violating European antitrust laws. 

Brad Smith, Microsoft Senior VP and General Counsel, starts off in a blog post praising Google for a decade of innovation in the marketplace and its efforts to "organize the world's information", but quickly moves in on what he feels are the company's moves to squash the competition at every corner. 

For starters, Google has roughly a 65 percent share of the internet search market in the United States (Microsoft holds a 26 percent share in the U.S. when you account for Bing and its stake in Yahoo's search engine). "At Microsoft we’ve shown that we’re prepared to work hard and invest literally billions of dollars annually to offer Bing, a search service that many now regard as the most innovative available," said Smith. "But, hard work and innovation need a fair and competitive marketplace in which to thrive."

In Europe, however, Google's share is a whopping 95 percent according to Smith. Google is accused of using this enviable position to corner the European market with regards to search advertising.

It understands as well as anyone that search engines depend upon the openness of the Web in order to function properly, and it’s quick to complain when others undermine this.  Unfortunately, Google has engaged in a broadening pattern of walling off access to content and data that competitors need to provide search results to consumers and to attract advertisers 

Smith even goes so far as to say that Google doesn't offer competitors enough access to produce credible YouTube clients for smartphones. Google of course provides a powerful YouTube application with its Android smartphone/tablet operating system, and Google's long-running deal with Apple allows iOS devices like the iPhone and iPad to contain highly functional versions of the YouTube application.

Microsoft complains about YouTube openness, stating:

Unfortunately, Google has refused to allow Microsoft’s new Windows Phones to access this YouTube metadata in the same way that Android phones and iPhones do.  As a result, Microsoft’s YouTube “app” on Windows Phones is basically just a browser displaying YouTube’s mobile Web site, without the rich functionality offered on competing phones.  Microsoft is ready to release a high quality YouTube app for Windows Phone.  We just need permission to access YouTube in the way that other phones already do, permission Google has refused to provide. 

Google's dominance in search and its unwillingness to share the wealth when it comes to YouTube are just the tip of the iceberg. Microsoft has a long listen of grievances including Google's venture into the books arena, restrictions on customer/advertiser data, content control, and unfair advantages when it comes to advertisement positioning. You can read all of Microsoft's complaints here

"We readily appreciate that Google should continue to have the freedom to innovate," Smith concludes. "But it shouldn’t be permitted to pursue practices that restrict others from innovating and offering competitive alternatives.  That’s what it’s doing now.  And that’s what we hope European officials will assess and ultimately decide to stop."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Anti-competitive practices
By omnicronx on 3/31/2011 12:13:27 PM , Rating: 3
There is a huge difference between what you let somebody access on a website and using your hold on a OS to shoot down competitors.
No there is a huge difference between disallowing access to a website when you are a single entity. (nor is this what is happening here, most of the things mentioned here are external services)

Google is just as much of a giant in the web space as MS was/is in the desktop space.

The idea remains the same, both companies are using their market dominance to push things upon users. (in this case it means the Youtube experience will be better on the the devices Google has chosen to open it up too)

The fact that many users like Google products is completely irrelevant. You may like what they are doing now, but that's not the point, 10 years down the line when everything flows through Google and everyone will not be signing the same tune.

As for Google blocking access to data that is not what I see. We see fine in SiteCatalyst when our visitors come from Google including search words and so on.
Not what the article is question is discussing. What is being discussed is the data pushed to Google ad servers. Not even close to the same thing, what you are talking about is merely personal monitoring of your site.

As for you last line, you clearly don't seem to understand what MS was doing. They were tracking click through results, it has nothing to do with openness as anyone can do that, with or without consent.

By Master Kenobi on 4/1/2011 9:08:38 PM , Rating: 2
On point. If Google is preventing access to metadata that allows MS to make an actual Youtube player for their platform just as iOS and Android have then Google is abusing their market position. Ironically while Apple won't allow Adobe Flash to be loaded on their precious little iOS, they did allow Google to stick a custom app to play youtube (flash) videos. Clever strategizing by Apple to give users what they want, and Google for sucking in a usergroup that has basically no alternative as flash can't run on the platform. Windows Phone 7 has every right to its own youtube application just as iOS and Android. If the EU is applying a standard policy approach to Monopoly suits then Google will likely be forced to open the metadata up for Microsoft and other companies to utilize in their products to stream the youtube videos as well. Ironically Google had no problem providing such an application for Windows Phone 6.1 and 6.5, back when they didn't have Android.

“Then they pop up and say ‘Hello, surprise! Give us your money or we will shut you down!' Screw them. Seriously, screw them. You can quote me on that.” -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng referencing patent trolls

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki