backtop


Print 13 comment(s) - last by SAmely.. on Mar 31 at 10:52 AM


  (Source: www.twitip.com)
Many of Twitter's 200 million registered users are not active on the site, and Jack Dorsey is looking to change that

Social networking sites have become wildly popular in recent years, allowing people to connect with loved ones and friends they haven't seen in ages. Social networking has also become a huge marketing tool. But the competition is fierce, and Twitter is looking to become a larger player in the competitive social networking ring. 

Sites like MySpace, which has recently shifted its focus toward entertainment, and Facebook, which has over 500 million active users and a movie made about its creation, have dominated the social networking industry for some time now. While Twitter has risen in popularity since its launch in July 2006, Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey is looking to make the microblogging website more "mainstream." 

Twitter is the place for short messages of 140 characters or less, and a way to stay up-to-date with friends, family and even celebrities who are avid Twitterers like Conan O'Brien and Charlie Sheen. Twitter has certainly made a presence in the social networking world with more than 200 million registered users, but according to a research firm called eMarketer, very few of these users are active. In fact, "less than 25 percent of Twitter users generate about 90 percent of tweets."

Now, Dorsey has stepped in after nearly a three-year absence in an effort to make Twitter more appealing to the masses. He will act as Twitter's executive chairman, and supervise product development from here on out. Dorsey was initially Twitter's chief executive until Evan Williams replaced him in 2008. 

"We need to refocus on the value and that is my goal in the next few months," said Dorsey. 

Despite increased competition and lack of appeal to the masses, Twitter has still grown significantly since its launch. In December 2010, the microblogging site was valued at $3.7 billion in a $200 million funding round by Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, a venture capital firm. Earlier this month, investors valued the company at $7.7 billion at an auction of Twitter shares.  

"We have a lot of mainstream awareness, but mainstream relevancy is still a challenge," said Dorsey. 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By SAmely on 3/30/2011 5:58:50 PM , Rating: 2
I disagree that it's pointless, and I'm aware of all the things you listed, but the only thing that comes close is RSS.

I don't disagree that it can be used as a pointless social networking tool, but it can also be used in other ways that I find useful. You don't, I get it. I don't know how much you've used it or your experience with it, either. But that may not matter given the strong tone you've presented.


By tng on 3/30/2011 6:39:21 PM , Rating: 2
I think that he like myself look at Twitter as mainly a social network that has limited uses given that we already have tools to do everything that it does, just not in one place.

I also think that like me his perception of the site is maybe colored by the fact that we see it used more for the pointless comments made by useless celebs and the like and not as anything that we would be interested in.

Facebook is also somewhat like this, but it does have it's uses.


By Boze on 3/31/2011 8:26:50 AM , Rating: 1
My perception isn't really "colored" by any of what happens on Twitter.

I asked myself, "What does Twitter provide to me which I do not already have access?" Nothing. There's literally nothing I can see on Twitter that I cannot see elsewhere, and usually in a more comprehensive form.

Twitter is SMS messaging in a medium that allows for essentially unlimited storage. SMS messaging limits themselves were a number just pulled out of thin air with no scientific or market research to back it up - http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/05...

This is just one more technology that has extremely limited application and which vain people use to give their existence additional meaning. Its the same concept as "friend collectors" on Facebook. Only a small percentage of humans can effective manage a social circle larger than 150 people. The best humans can manage around a 1000. Its literally impossible to have meaningful relationships with 2000+, let alone 3000, 4000, 5000 like some Facebook users have.

Once again, I submit that Twitter is useful for a few, useless for most, and certainly not worth $7.7 billion.


By SAmely on 3/31/2011 10:52:28 AM , Rating: 2
I get what you're saying, but I can't help but think you're minimizing the possible uses of it.

The majority of what I care about on Twitter is people who post factual information, not those who have a stream of consciousness of their daily life.

I also like to see opinions from people I respect, that are on Twitter. I'm absolutely not friends with most of the people I follow on Twitter, which is currently at 139. So, it has nothing to do with a social space in that regard for me.

Not sure why I'm responding, but alas, I did.


"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For [Paramount] to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks!" -- Movie Director Michael Bay

Related Articles
Google, Facebook Circle Around Twitter
February 10, 2011, 11:25 AM
Facebook Tops 500M Active Users
July 21, 2010, 5:26 PM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki