Print 31 comment(s) - last by KOOLTIME.. on Mar 31 at 8:13 PM

A virus called human metapneumovirus (HMPV) infected several gorillas and even killed two in 2009

Researchers from the United States and Africa have discovered that diseases can pass from humans to gorillas, and can even cause death to these wild mountain gorillas.

Gustavo Palacios, study leader and virologist at the Center for Infection and Immunity at Columbia University in New York, along with Mike Cranfield, executive director of the Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project and a UC Davis wildlife veterinarian, Linda Lowenstein, a veterinary pathologist with the UC Davis Mountain Gorilla One Health Program, and a team of researchers from the Rwanda Development Board have found that wild mountain gorillas are capable of catching infectious diseases from humans

The fact that gorillas have had close contact to humans -- such as gorillas living near densely populated areas in Rwanda, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda -- does not help these endangered species. Also, tourists who visit these gorillas in their shelters expose them to even more potential diseases.

Now, this study has found that gorilla's living in the national parks in Africa are being infected by a respiratory disease that is common in humans (gorillas and humans share 98 percent of the same DNA). The outbreaks of these human-caused diseases have become much more frequent in these specific gorilla populations in recent years. This is problematic because the respiratory issues have proved to be fatal to some of the gorillas. In fact, two gorillas died in 2009 due to human viruses. 

"The type of infection we see most frequently is respiratory, which can range from mild colds to severe pneumonia," said Lowenstine.

The two gorillas that died from the human virus were apart of the Hirwa group, which resides in Rwanda. In 2009, this group had 12 gorillas ranging from males to females to juveniles to infants. Eleven were infected by the respiratory disease, which resulted in symptoms such as watery eyes, runny nose, coughing and lethargy. Two of the infected gorillas died. 

When the tissues of the two gorillas were examined, both had the biochemical signature of an RNA virus called human metapneumovirus (HMPV). An adult female and an infant were the ones killed by the virus.

"Because there are fewer than 800 living mountain gorillas, each individual is critically important to the survival of their species," said Cranfield. "But mountain gorillas are surrounded by people, and this discovery makes it clear that living in protected national parks is not a barrier to human diseases."

This study was published in Emerging Infectious Diseases.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Why not cull them
By PrinceGaz on 3/29/2011 7:31:34 PM , Rating: -1
This is more proof there needs to be a cull of humans in countries with unsustainable populations. All aid associated with saving lives in over-populated countries (including feeding children which is madness when the population is already too high) should stop, and be replaced with aid to reduce the birth-rate (including enforced sterilisation if necessary), so that those countries can actually survive on their own over time.

RE: Why not cull them
By blueaurora on 3/29/2011 7:41:28 PM , Rating: 2
Well as good as that sounds we should by that logic murder all murders, de-hand all thieves, sterilize all sex offenders and the list goes on.

I am not saying I disagree with you but you should know the extent of what you suggest.

Personally I think we shouldn't give aid to anyone. I don't mind spending money on training to lead them to be self sustaining. Many low income areas of the globe are that way not necessarily because of overpopulation but the lack of any real effort put into infrastructure of crops, goods and economy. When you are poor it is hard to get out of the me me me mentality because you don't have anything.

It happens here in the us as well but if they can't decided to break out of the rut themselves and make some sacrifices to get a better life things will never change.

I love the "Give a man a fish you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish you feed him for life." I wish someone in this country would lead by that principle. Not what sounds good enough to make me popular and get me elected.

RE: Why not cull them
By blueaurora on 3/29/2011 7:43:44 PM , Rating: 2
Parents make the tough derisions in life. Kids live in the dream world.

When did we elect kids into our entire governing body?

RE: Why not cull them
By Cront on 3/29/2011 7:46:27 PM , Rating: 3
I am not saying I disagree with you but you should know the extent of what you suggest.

How can you conscionably say you don't disagree with the outrageous statement above?

RE: Why not cull them
By Murloc on 3/30/2011 6:37:50 AM , Rating: 3
you can't force productivity in a poor man born in a culture where your self-made man ideals don't matter.
That's what's wrong with the West mentality, thinking that they are willing to better their life by putting in lots of hard work.
Some of them are, too many of them are closed in this poor man's mentality.

I think that we shouldn't give direct help except help against illnesses or stuff they don't have control upon (like malaria or disasters).
Don't go and build a well.
Just tell them how we did it in the middle age, then it's up to them to put in the effort.

RE: Why not cull them
By cknobman on 3/30/2011 9:13:14 AM , Rating: 2
I agree with you and the post you replied too.

RE: Why not cull them
By Obujuwami on 3/29/2011 7:45:38 PM , Rating: 2
While your idea of increasing the aid to birth control is a good one, though I doubt it will be of any real difference. Unless you have a state funded program where women are implanted with IUDs (which are good for 5 years) and must have one unless given permission by the state to have children, it wont work. Millions are already spent on education and condoms but the religious element in Africa, all of them, are against birth control and come up with such stupid lies as "Your member will fall of if you use a condom!!!"

I think instead of forcing sterilization, we should in fact tell the religious folk to stop propagating the lies having to do with birth control and begin an educational program supplemented with FREE birth control. We should also make several forms of it available, including IUDS and the shot that works for 3 months, etc. It may be a slow and hard path for people, but it will eventually achieve what they need.

As for forced sterilization, I think we should only use it on those who are ready to use it on others first.

RE: Why not cull them
By PrinceGaz on 3/29/11, Rating: -1
RE: Why not cull them
By Solandri on 3/29/2011 9:15:46 PM , Rating: 1
Enough with the anti-religious nonsense. The high population growth rate in Africa has a plethora of reasons having very little to do with religion. It's been a PITA trying to get people there simply to use condoms to try to stop the spread of AIDS.

And if you look at which countries are growing quickest in population, there's very little correlation to regional religion.

The strongest correlation is to population growth is degree of economic development in the country. To stem population growth in developing countries, we need to be providing them with education, engineering, and loans to help them kick-start their own economies.

RE: Why not cull them
By SunTzu on 3/30/2011 7:32:52 AM , Rating: 2
You do realize on of the major issues people have with the catholic church in africa is how they indoctrinate people into not using contraception, including condoms, right?

RE: Why not cull them
By DarthKaos on 3/31/2011 10:27:11 AM , Rating: 2
The problem is we keep giving. All other species on this planet realize that when a member of their group can not keep up or pull their own wait, they are left to survive or die. Animals are compassionate and will help each other to a point but then they realize that survival of the group and their own survival depends on keeping the strong safe.

Stop sending aide. Stop giving food. Stop carrying the week and lazy while being chased by the predator of a decaying planet. Put them down and instead help lift up the next generation of hard working, intelligent, driven human beings be even more successful. Eventually; if we quit keeping the weak and lazy around, we will have a world filled with strong self sufficient humans. Maybe we can avoid diluting the human race into something less and will instead make it something more..

RE: Why not cull them
By DanNeely on 3/29/2011 8:18:31 PM , Rating: 2
I have the same thing to say to you as I do to everyone else I meet who is in/directly advocating voluntary human extinction: Breathing is hypocrisy.

RE: Why not cull them
By Flunk on 3/30/2011 12:06:34 AM , Rating: 1
I suggest we start the cull with you, and end it once we've gotten everyone who agrees with you. We can donate your resources to those people in third-world countries you clearly hate.

RE: Why not cull them
By cknobman on 3/30/2011 9:15:09 AM , Rating: 2
Yes anyone who doesnt share your opinion should be "dealt with".

Nice logic idiot.

"And boy have we patented it!" -- Steve Jobs, Macworld 2007
Related Articles

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki