Print 15 comment(s) - last by Da W.. on Mar 25 at 9:38 AM

Nokia is stuck between a rock and a hard place. If it doesn't cut jobs and ditch Symbian soon, it risks losing the benefits of its Microsoft deal. But cuts could add momentum to the True Finns party, which is wreaking havoc (party chairman Timo Soini pictured).  (Source: Tundra Tabloids)
Company has to answer to Finnish labor unions, politicians

While Nokia's growth has stalled, competitors like Apple and Android phone makers (Motorola, ZTE, HTC, etc.) have soared.  Now the company is forced to make a big transition as it prepares to move away from the Symbian operating system to Microsoft's Windows Phone 7.

Finnish labor unions, according to Reuters, fear that the move could cost thousands of jobs.  Many engineers at Nokia had worked on developing and maintaining Symbian and its apps.  Now they are likely to be sent packing.

A company spokesperson says talks with staff about the impending cuts will occur "toward the end of April".  Analysts believe the delay could mean the deal with Microsoft hasn't been signed and finalized.

It could also be due to the fact that Finland's national elections fall on April 17.  The "True Finn" populist party has recently surged in the polls, reaching second place.  Major job cuts could propel them further and create a headache for the European Union's currency efforts.  Markku Jokisipila, a political scientist from the University of Turku suggests, "It would have probably boosted True Finns as they have criticized big corporations and they could use it in their campaign."

Nokia Chairman Jorma Ollila, in an interview with Finnish newspaper Helsingin Sanomat, reassuringly offers, "This is a global restructuring of our product development, so it is not only about Finland. There is nothing on the horizon that would be particularly horrible for Finland, or something that would give grounds for the argument that Finland would not be treated well."

Unfortunately, what's good for Finland and the EU may backfire for both Nokia and its partner Microsoft.  Shareholders are happy with the deal, but upset that Nokia does not immediately begin scrapping Symbian.

States Mr. Ollila, "We have spoken with 20-30 central shareholders and their message is very clear. They consider the strategy good and the Windows decision the right one. They do not like that we are about to start a restructuring period that takes 18 months or two years. It is such a long period that some investors do not have patience for that."

Nokia remains a sales giant in Europe and throughout much of the rest of the world, despite its weak presence in the U.S.  Nokia's switch to Windows Phone 7 may hand Microsoft the second place spot in global smart phone operating system market share.  Microsoft reportedly paid Nokia $1B USD to avoid turning to Android.  It also helped that Nokia's new chief executive, Stephen Elop, was a former executive at Microsoft Canada.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Iketh on 3/24/2011 10:09:56 AM , Rating: 2
I'm so confused... didn't intel get sued for giving vendors incentives to not buy amd? Isn't microsoft doing the same thing here?

RE: confused...
By omnicronx on 3/24/2011 10:52:18 AM , Rating: 2
No they are not, Intel held a very large portion of the market and leveraged their market dominance to influence its suppliers and vendors.

Even with this agreement, MS smartphones only account for a fraction of the market. You can't really be anti competitive if your market control is almost non existent.

RE: confused...
By Souka on 3/24/2011 11:29:54 AM , Rating: 2
I sat next to a Win7 mobile developer a dinner.

He didn't say he was one at first...but instead asked me about my DroidX and what I liked....and what I liked it better than iPhone or Win7mo.

I rattled off a list...mostly basing Microsoft before he said what he did.

He seemed to have some hope with the Nokia project...but not much.

My $.02

RE: confused...
By omnicronx on 3/24/2011 11:56:07 AM , Rating: 2
Do you mean he develops Win7 mobile apps? Or he is actually a Windows mobile 7 developer (i.e he was part of the OS development team).

If its the latter, why is this persons expertise of any importance? Even if he was an MS employee and developer, what credentials does he have to make a such a statement?

I'm a programmer too, but that hardly means my input on where my company is heading holds any value. Why? Because I'm a developer and that's not my job, nor do I have the expertise to be making such statements.

RE: confused...
By sviola on 3/24/2011 4:34:18 PM , Rating: 3
Well, not to criticise you, but being a developer does not prevent you from understanding the market and the directions your company is taking nor prevent you from having an opinion on it. And it is not only if you have shares, but as an employee, understanding the company's strategies will only benefit you professionally.

RE: confused...
By InvertMe on 3/24/2011 12:48:26 PM , Rating: 2
If you are "basing" WP7 while comparing it to Android you cannot have used WP7 much.... Just saying.

RE: confused...
By Cheesew1z69 on 3/24/2011 7:40:46 PM , Rating: 2
I really wished people would quit using that lame term "Just Saying", we know WTF you are saying...

RE: confused...
By Alexvrb on 3/25/2011 12:18:13 AM , Rating: 2
I won't say that the term has a single narrow meaning, but a lot of times it is used to imply things like "Don't read into this too deeply", "I'm not trying to criticize", or "Don't get offended, but...".

So basically I don't think you really know WTF he is saying. I'm just saying. (in other words, no offense)

RE: confused...
By InvertMe on 3/24/2011 12:49:07 PM , Rating: 3
Ohh and I don't believe your story either.. just saying that too...

RE: confused...
By drycrust3 on 3/24/2011 2:57:05 PM , Rating: 1
They say that Microsoft offered Nokia about $1B to have their OS on Nokia's phones, so one needs to ask what will generate sales of at least $2B for them. It seems pretty obvious that this isn't about Nokia's current generation of mobile phones.
We can see that the boundary between the PC and the mobile phone is already blurring, and that in the future the mobile phone will be the PC. People wonder why MS wasn't first to launch the tablet type computer. Maybe the reason wasn't that they didn't think of it, but because they wanted a competitor to launch one first.
My understanding is that MS has to offer a variety of browsers to end users of W7 within the EU, so I think this is all about them not having to do this.
By having their OS on European made mobile phones, but without the requirement to offer Firefox, Chrome, Opera, etc, then one can expect they will want to use that as leverage to not have competitors browsers on PCs sold with the next generations of Windows.

RE: confused...
By Da W on 3/25/2011 9:38:58 AM , Rating: 2
If you bought 80% from Intel, they gave you such a rebate to go to 90% that this last 10% had a negative price. That was the anticompetitive thing.

"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki