backtop


Print 48 comment(s) - last by macthemechanic.. on Mar 26 at 11:17 AM


  (Source: the3gshow.com)
RealNetworks raises serious questions about Apple's tactics with iTunes

An order issued earlier this week by a federal magistrate judge will require Apple CEO Steve Jobs to answer questions regarding an iTunes antitrust suit.

ITunes, Apple's proprietary digital media player application, was launched in 2003. It became wildly successful, even beating Wal-Mart as the biggest music retailer in April 2008. 

But according to RealNetworks, a Seattle-based provider of Internet media software and services, iTunes allegedly utilized unfair practices in the digital media industry between October 2004 and March 2009. In july 2004, RealNetworks announced that its online store offered music that could be used on iPods through a technology called Harmony. Five days later, Apple released updates to its iPod FairPlay software, which is a proprietary software used by Apple to encode its digital music files. The iPod FairPlay software allowed iTunes music files to be used only on iPods, and blocked digital music sold by other companies to be played on the iPod. This included RealNetworks' digital files.

In 2005, Thomas Slattery, an iTunes customer, filed a lawsuit on behalf of customers who believe Apple "illegally limited consumer choice" by making iTunes exclusively for iPod and vice versa. He asserted antitrust claims from Apple's use of the FairPlay software. 

In 2008, Apple faced the same issues with consumers in Europe who complained about the lack of compatibility with iTunes and the iPod. The European Union Competition Commission started an inquiry in 2005, where regulators from Norway, Denmark and Sweden examined the situation. As a result, Apple lowered the prices of iTunes tracks in the United Kingdom. 

In March 2009, iTunes began selling digital music without the proprietary software, and in May 2010, the U.S. Justice Department's antitrust division began looking into Apple's business practices associated with iTunes and the iPod. 

Now, U.S. Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd in San Jose, California has issued an order that allows lawyers for consumers to question Jobs. The deposition can only consist of questions regarding Apple's software changes made in October 2004, which prevented digital tracks from RealNetworks from being played on the iPod. In addition, the deposition can only be two hours long.

"The court finds that Jobs has unique, non-repetitive, firsthand knowledge about the issues at the center of the dispute over RealNetworks software," said Lloyd. 

Lloyd also declined requests from the plaintiff to question Jobs regarding Apple's refusal to license FairPlay to other companies as well as the companies use of the software on digital tracks from iTunes and the iPod. Both claims were dismissed from the litigation in December 2009.

"Plaintiffs remaining claims rely on the allegation that Apple attempted to maintain a monopoly in the audio download and portable music player market by issuing updates to FairPlay, Apple's proprietary digital rights management software," said David Kiernan, Apple's attorney. 

Also, Kiernan noted that "any deposition of Mr. Jobs would be repetitive, at best."

A deposition has not been scheduled yet, according to San Diego lawyer Bonny E. Sweeney, who is representing the plaintiffs, but a hearing regarding Apple's motion to dismiss the case is scheduled for April 18. 


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Not really...
By snakeInTheGrass on 3/23/2011 12:19:21 PM , Rating: 0
They took the DRM off of the iTunes music a few years back already. I understand avoiding buying iTunes content prior to that (hell, or even now if you want lossless CD quality or better), but I used my iPod for years before that with my own ripped CD content (both mp3 and AAC), so I'm not sure music is the best example of Apple making a walled garden at this point. AAC certainly isn't Apple's own codec. (It's Advanced Audio Coding, not Apple's Audio Codec...)

Video is another matter, though we can thank the content producers for that - I don't think Apple gives a crap about adding proprietary DRM beyond the fact that they have to in order to be able to sell/stream movies and shows since they can't get content contracts without agreeing to that. You can't copy a Netflix show out of their streaming walled garden to your hard drive and watch it when/where you want either unless they enable it in their own app or someone else hacks the DRM, I'm sure Microsoft (whether relevant or not) isn't making the XBox streaming DRM free today either.

So sure, blame Apple for things they either aren't even doing to the content, or that they - and every other player out there - have to thanks to the MPAA, etc.

Apps... well, there you have the fact that Apple isn't trying to make iOS for other hardware. That's their choice, and consumers can vote for what they like there. (Or are you pissed if a Windows app won't run on Linux too?) But really, subjugated? Not so much.


"There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere." -- Isaac Asimov














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki