Print 90 comment(s) - last by Etern205.. on Mar 21 at 5:26 PM

Senator Dianne Feinstein, seen here giving a self-facepalm has suggested the federal government perform a massive expensive reevaluation of U.S. plant quake risks. An almost identical comprehensive study was performed three years ago and concluded the nation was safe.  (Source: NewsReal)
Apparently they missed the first study's conclusions

Yesterday we pointed out that a newly released study by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) concluded that nuclear power plants in the U.S. were well within acceptable levels of risk and should be deemed safe.  Unfortunately a report by MSNBC largely missed that conclusion.

And apparently they weren't the only ones.  The report has apparently touched off a bout of nuclear hysteria in Congress.  

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), chairman of the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee, and Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), chairman of the Senate Clean Air and Nuclear Safety Subcommittee demanded that the NRC perform a costly extensive study to determine if the plants are safe.

They write, "We call on the NRC to conduct a comprehensive investigation of all nuclear facilities in the United States to assess their capacity to withstand catastrophic natural or man-made disasters including scenarios that may be considered remote like the recent events in Japan."

"These domestic nuclear reactors must be fully evaluated to ensure that they are as safe and resilient as possible, that worst case scenarios are examined and addressed, and that personnel training and equipment for emergency responses are in place and up-to-date. Special and immediate attention should be given to those U.S. nuclear reactors that share similar characteristics as the failing reactors in Japan, including similar designs or located near a coastline or seismic fault line."

Apparently they missed the fact that the NRC did almost exactly that 3 years ago in 2008 (the study we referenced in yesterday's piece).  And their conclusion?  We're safe.

The only remaining question is whether Japan's nuclear plant situation would actually change any of the conclusions in the paper.  The answer, for most plants, is probably not.  

Only plants near flood-prone regions, or coastal regions in danger of tsunami strikes, might have additional risks due to the possibility of knocked out backup generators.

While the Senators do suggest an inquiry of such locations, they also ask for much more -- an investigation of "all nuclear facilities" with little factual justification provided.

The proposal also calls for other possibly expensive and unusual suggestions, such as requesting:

How comprehensive is the radiation monitoring system in Japan? Would the U.S. take a similar monitoring approach if a serious accident were to occur here? What increased risk is associated with exposure to mixed oxide fuel?

It also contains alarming language, such as:

Has the NRC modeled what could happen if the U.S. had multiple nuclear accidents simultaneously? If so, how would the NRC respond to such a disaster?

At a time when our nation's federal and state governments are facing huge budget deficits, this should be an excellent test of exactly how frenzied the public is about nuclear power in the U.S.  Will they stand by and support this expensive study, which is essentially a repeat of one just done a couple years ago?

One person is awfully satisfied with the news -- the original MSNBC report's author, Bill Dedman.  He brags of how he motivated the government to push the expensive study repeat, writing, "Three U.S. senators on Thursday called on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to answer for the safety and emergency preparedness at all nuclear facilities in the United States."

"As reported on Wednesday, the NRC has raised its earthquake damage estimates for the nation's 104 commercial nuclear power plants, particularly for those in the eastern and central states, where seismologists say the earthquake risk is higher than previously thought. The estimates by the NRC were provided to, which ranked the reactors by risk."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Fusion power anyone.
By Codeman03xx on 3/17/2011 5:29:22 PM , Rating: 1
Well its good to see that our resources are going to waste. Yes right now we need nuclear fisson, but fusion makes more sense so hurry the hell up already because the US Power infrastructure is failing (Power lines, Sub stations, coal plants, etc). Get CERN on this NOW!!! we need FUSION ENERGY. Fusion causes no fallout and is very safe and clean, and oh yeah it 4 times stronger too. With Fusion energy if power is lost over older distribution lines it won't matter as much because the power is soo much stronger. So we would need a max of 15 Fusion power plants over the US.

RE: Fusion power anyone.
By CharonPDX on 3/17/2011 8:00:55 PM , Rating: 2

We have yet to create a fusion power plant that sustainably produces more energy than it requires to run.

And "power is soo much stronger"? What is that supposed to mean?

Finally, as has been shown time and time again, it is a bad idea to use only a few very large power plants. If the entire U.S. were to run on only 15 power plants, what happens when two simultaneously have problems or have something disconnect them from the grid?

RE: Fusion power anyone.
By delphinus100 on 3/17/2011 9:52:52 PM , Rating: 2
I wouldn't cue the fusion cheering section just yet...

I still have hopes for those who are working on various approaches to hydrogen+boron11 'fusion' though...

And electricity is electricity, no matter how it's generated. No, you don't want to waste it in inefficient distribution.

RE: Fusion power anyone.
By Keeir on 3/18/2011 2:44:14 AM , Rating: 2
errr.. Fusion power is not going to magically fix the power grid.

RE: Fusion power anyone.
By rcc on 3/18/2011 2:00:15 PM , Rating: 2
Sure it will, any wiring that fusion power passes through will also be made stronger!!!!

I apologize in advance, I just couldn't resist.

"DailyTech is the best kept secret on the Internet." -- Larry Barber

Latest Headlines

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki