Print 24 comment(s) - last by bh192012.. on Mar 14 at 12:59 PM

Newly created carbon nanotube phase change memory sounds attractive, but it is much more expensive than traditional semiconductor-based phase-change memory. While it offers large energy efficiency gains, memory is typically a minimal part of power consumption on modern mobile devices.  (Source: Eric Pop, University of Illinois)
The root problem remains the power draw of the display

Researchers at the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at Illinois have improved upon a novel, faster form of memory to make it use power more efficiently.

The new memory falls under a class of devices called power phase-change materials (PCM), which store data as resistance, rather than charge.  Previous attempts at PCM memory had been fast, but less power efficient due to large contacts.

The Beckman team, led by computer engineering professor Eric Pop [profile], explored the prospects of much smaller phase-change memory using nanoscale contacts and a gapped carbon nanotube (a tube with a missing segment in the middle -- essentially two extremely almost touching nanotubes).

The results were that power consumption was cut by a factor of 100 from current generation phase change memory (the team did not put this in context with traditional memory, rather than to say it was much more efficient).

Professor Pop optimistically describes, "We're not just talking about lightening our pockets or purses. This is also important for anything that has to operate on a battery, such as satellites, telecommunications equipment in remote locations, or any number of scientific and military applications."

While semiconductor-based phase change memory is arguably commercially viable due to its speed, this carbon nanotube phase change memory may be one case where the actual device fails to live up to the hype.

How big an impact will this really have on mobile battery life, if it makes it to the market?  It’s likely that it won’t improve battery life that much in the long run.  Currently, the biggest power wasters on your mobile phone are your screen/GPU, your CPU, and the wireless modem [source]. 

Furthermore, there's no established process to create chips with gapped carbon nanotubes affordably in a fab.  Creating carbon nanotube PCM chips would be extremely expensive with today's technology.

Ultimately, this could bump memory access speeds slightly, and bump the battery life 2 or 3 percent in the best-case scenario.  While it's true every bit counts, the cost may more that negate the minimal gains.  

In other words you're spending a tremendous premium to go from semiconductor to carbon nanotubes and the only reward for that switch (reduced power consumption) is extremely minimal.

And the real question here is "why memory?"  There are so many more attractive power efficiency targets -- like transistors (for CPUs), the battery itself, wireless modems, and displays.   

When and if carbon nanotube production becomes affordable, this idea may become marginally useful.  But for now chalk this one to a lot of bark but not much byte.

The team's study is published [abstract] in the journal Science.


Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Some Applications
By smackababy on 3/11/2011 5:05:09 PM , Rating: 5
Or maybe it will eventually get smaller and cheaper like all other memory.

RE: Some Applications
By TSS on 3/11/2011 6:10:39 PM , Rating: 5
Alcohol accelerates this process.

... oh wait we where talking about electronics.

RE: Some Applications
By vol7ron on 3/11/2011 6:45:40 PM , Rating: 2
This is where NASA comes in to front the costs :)

Honestly, this technology could be very important in the future, especially as things move toward more SOCs and more 3D. I'm assuming this technology can be applied to more than just DIMM RAM, and possibly the on-chip cache. I suppose one day we'll see DIMM-less motherboards.

While there might be other technologies with higher power efficiency issues, I imagine this one was introduced because it isn't as complicated and there are several solution approaches.

RE: Some Applications
By mmatis on 3/12/2011 10:15:09 AM , Rating: 2
Except that, unless this memory is resistant to cosmic rays, there is very little chance it is usable for space applications. I believe you will find that successful space vehicles used hardened electronics much like those spec'd by the military for systems used in nuclear conflicts.

RE: Some Applications
By vol7ron on 3/12/2011 12:15:35 PM , Rating: 2
This is very true. The exterior disturbances affect electronic equipment, but I think that is where better casings are required.

Anyhow, I'm curious how DARPA's anti-matter shield could be used.

"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki