backtop


Print 11 comment(s) - last by vol7ron.. on Mar 23 at 10:22 PM

A simple IMAP patch and it's flowers and roses for this corporate couple

Microsoft blamed Yahoo, Yahoo blamed Microsoft.  It was another embarrassing episode for the pair, which had previously conducted a rocky courtship before tying the knot with a big business deal in June 2009.

The incident in question was the mysterious case of "phantom data" usage on the Windows Phone 7 platform.  Microsoft zeroed in on the culprit -- an overactive Yahoo! Mail app.  From there it was off to the blame game races.

But with a patch to its IMAP mail servers, Yahoo has fixed the issue, sparing users battery life and data allotments.

Of course this news will only truly impact those who use the Yahoo! Mail app on their smart phones -- a moderately small group.  Still, putting this embarrassing fight behind them is in the best interest of both companies.

After all, Microsoft has bigger and better things to focus on -- like rolling out its first major Windows Phone 7 update later this month, which will add copy and paste and performance enhancements.  

As for Yahoo, it can now get back to quietly riding off into the sunset of search engine obscurity, as Bing and Google eat up it's remaining market share (though in affect this is zero-gain for Microsoft, as Bing code has already replaced Yahoo's search engine in everything but the name).



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

a simple patch IMAP patch
By Pirks on 3/11/2011 3:16:30 PM , Rating: -1
a crappy editor Mick editor




RE: a simple patch IMAP patch
By RjBass on 3/11/11, Rating: -1
RE: a simple patch IMAP patch
By Pirks on 3/11/11, Rating: -1
RE: a simple patch IMAP patch
By cjohnson2136 on 3/11/2011 6:14:14 PM , Rating: 4
I didn't understand the purpose of being a grammar nazi and pointing out every little mistake that Mick makes while he writes. Are you saying you have never made a typo or anything like that. You are just a perfect writer that never screws up.


RE: a simple patch IMAP patch
By vol7ron on 3/11/2011 6:50:00 PM , Rating: 3
Prick, I mean Pirks, does bring up a good point though. What does this reputation stuff really do?


RE: a simple patch IMAP patch
By Mitch101 on 3/11/2011 7:56:11 PM , Rating: 3
You had it right the first time.


RE: a simple patch IMAP patch
By Kurz on 3/12/2011 11:02:16 AM , Rating: 3
If you have an average of 0 or less I think you have to put in a code every time you post something. To keep the spammers out.


RE: a simple patch IMAP patch
By vol7ron on 3/23/2011 10:22:17 PM , Rating: 2
That's pretty cool, I didn't know that


RE: a simple patch IMAP patch
By Exirtis on 3/14/2011 1:55:01 PM , Rating: 2
You have to admit that Jason Mick's posts are generally rather poor editing-wise. When you can tell who you're reading by the editing issues alone, in that it distinguishes you from the other writers on the site, that's not a good sign. Pirks doesn't have to be a person who's never screwed up, writing-wise, if he/she is pointing out actual issues.

That being said, Pirks generally doesn't go about pointing out these issues in the most constructive/helpful way so I can understand your annoyance, to a degree.


RE: a simple patch IMAP patch
By BruceLeet on 3/11/11, Rating: 0
"If a man really wants to make a million dollars, the best way would be to start his own religion." -- Scientology founder L. Ron. Hubbard














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki