backtop


Print 58 comment(s) - last by callmeroy.. on Mar 10 at 3:43 PM


Nokia CEO Stephen Elop
"I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse."

Nokia ruffled more than a few feathers when it announced that it would be shacking up with Microsoft when it comes to smartphone operating systems. Feeling the heat from smartphone operating systems like Apple's iOS and Google's Android, Nokia is winding down its efforts with MeeGo and Symbian in order to embrace the nascent Windows Phone 7 (WP7) operating system.

Now, a new report from BusinessWeek suggests that Nokia was offered a sweet deal to go with Microsoft’s WP7 operating system over the rival Android OS. BusinessWeek says that Nokia will receive roughly $1B as a part of a 5-year deal with Microsoft.

Microsoft, of course, will also profit handsomely from its $1B investment if Nokia's WP7 offerings take off in the marketplace. Unlike with Google's freely available Android OS, Nokia will pay Microsoft a royalty fee for each WP7 handset that it sells.

“This gives Microsoft scale and allows Nokia to rip out costs,” said Colin Gillis, an analyst at BGC Partners in New York, who recommends buying Microsoft shares. “Microsoft is getting the platform boost.” 

Although $1B USD is a nice motivator to adopt WP7, Nokia's Stephen Elop claims that Nokia would have gotten lost in vast sea of me-too Android devices, and that the Microsoft partnership gives it a chance to shine. “A decision to go with Windows Phone creates a very different dynamic. Windows Phone is a challenger. It becomes a three-horse race,” said Elop according to Mobile Beat.

Nokia’s Symbian operating system has been under a constant assault from Android. Android overtook Symbian as the world’s best-selling smartphone operating system in Q4 2010 (33.3 million units versus 31 million units).



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: is this any surprise?
By Smilin on 3/8/2011 10:37:29 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
Your the one talking out of your arse if you didn't know that Kinnect wasn't developed by MS. It was made by Canesta, which MS bought
I think you mean Primesense. Microsoft partnered with them,and didn't buy them. Primesense had approached Apple first but was put off by their arrogance and draconian vendor rules. (in other words Apple can't do partnerships as well as Microsoft)

The primesense sensor is also but a small part of Kinect. The rest was done by collaboration between the Entertainment division and the R&D division..you know the facial recognition, gesture extration? Directional mics combined with player location recognition and facial recognition to confirm a moving mouth. Primesense didn't do that crap. MS did.

quote:
MS doesn't innovate.

Man that argument is getting tired. It's been disproven over and over again. I know the rule is that if you repeat a lie enough that it becomes truth...that doesn't work here in the face of facts. They have the largest self created patent portfolio of all their competitors. 9Billion in R&D.

quote:
It bullies, leverages existing monopolies,
Actually it doesn't leverage existing monopolies. If it did it would violate the DoJ settlement which has been complied with 110% since it came into being. Outside of IE, and WMP player what have you seen included in the OS lately? Windows Live Essentials are free, why aren't they bundled? Apple does. Security Essentials...free..not bundled. Get it?

quote:
and if that doesn't work it gets out the checkbook like in the case with Nokia.


Don't forget that partnerships are innovation too. Microsoft is good at making win-win partnerships. I know Apple fans will agree :). Other companies don't pull it off as well. (AOL, Timewarner, Novell, etc.)

Mcnabney your whole post reeks of hatred and self induced ignorance. All of the big three: MSFT, Goog, AAPL have merits and all three have done some phenominal innovation and all three have recognized merits of others and incorporated them. You know that Android, iOS, and OSX weren't home grown right? MS-Dos 1.0 wasn't either but everything else since has been.


RE: is this any surprise?
By mcnabney on 3/8/2011 2:57:56 PM , Rating: 1
I can spend $9B on whores, it doesn't mean I know anything about sex.

Microsoft is only good at extending their monopoly. Take the Xbox for instance. They had to pillage PC gaming in order to build market share. Because RIM and Apple also had Office functionality Windows Mobile had to compete on their own innovation (without monopoly leverage) and they obviously failed. In this case with Nokia, MS is trying to outright BUY market share. They aren't even giving away the OS, like Google. They are paying companies to use theirs.


RE: is this any surprise?
By Smilin on 3/9/2011 4:25:14 PM , Rating: 2
Not really much point in talking to you if you're just going to spew hyperbole.

You think the Xbox is successful today because it somehow leveraged the Windows "monopoly"? Explain good sir...I'm all ears.

"microsoft doesn't innovate" is a tired argument disproven over and over and over and over again. Yet still the irrational nutbags come out of the woodwork to repeat it.


"What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders." -- Michael Dell, after being asked what to do with Apple Computer in 1997














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki