backtop


Print 31 comment(s) - last by Souka.. on Mar 8 at 3:20 PM

Dealis subject to regulatory approval

Western Digital is one of the largest firms in the traditional hard drive manufacturing realm. Other notable companies in the HDD market include Hitachi GST and Seagate. Western Digital has announced that it has entered into an agreement to purchase Hitachi GST and combine its operations.

The deal was announced today and will cost WD about $4.3 billion. The transaction will be paid with $3.5 billion in cash and 25 million WD common shares valued at about $750 million. Hitachi will also get to place two representatives on the WD board of directors. The stock will mean that Hitachi Ltd will own about 10% of all outstanding WD stock.

The deal still has to get regulatory approvals and is subject to other customary closing conditions as well. WD will take out $2.5 billion in new debt to pay the cash portion of the deal. According to WD, it expects the purchase to immediately start contributing to its earnings per share on a non-GAAP basis after excluding the acquisition expenses, restructuring charges, and other costs.

The merged companies will continue to operate under the Western Digital brand and will continue to be headquartered in Irvine, California. WD CEO will remain John Coyne and the COO will be Tim Leyden with Wolfgang Nickl as CFO. There are no changes in the WD senior staff. Hitachi GST president and CEO Steve Milligan will move to WD as president reporting directly to CEO Coyne.

"The acquisition of Hitachi GST is a unique opportunity for WD to create further value for our customers, stockholders, employees, suppliers and the communities in which we operate," said John Coyne, president and chief executive officer of WD. "We believe this step will result in several key benefits-enhanced R&D capabilities, innovation and expansion of a rich product portfolio, comprehensive market coverage and scale that will enhance our cost structure and ability to compete in a dynamic marketplace. The skills and contributions of both workforces were key considerations in assessing this compelling opportunity. We will be relying on the proven integration capabilities of both companies to assure the ongoing satisfaction of our customers and to bring this combination to successful fruition."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By GladeCreek on 3/7/2011 3:07:32 PM , Rating: 2
I really believe all manufacturers have more or less the same failure rate.... however..

I've had 9 WD drives fail over the last 18 months, BUT I have never had a WD drive lose data. They seem to always predict the failure and drop out of the array long before a real problem, the RMA process couldn't be easier or quicker, and in every case a replacement arrived before any data loss.

Contrast that with Seagate.. ugh. I have had 3 data losses with Seagate. Two were multiple drive failures in RAID 5 (within days) before a replacement arrived. Both resulted in bare metal restores from tape. In all 27 Seagate failures in 14 years.

I'll take WD over Seagate any day.


"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki