Print 65 comment(s) - last by Smilin.. on Mar 7 at 4:53 PM

Microsoft will be releasing Windows 7 tablets this year, but its dedicated tablet build of Windows 7 reportedly won't land until next year.  (Source: Microsoft)
Microsoft looks to arrive VERY late to the tablet game

According to Bloomberg, sources at Microsoft state that the company will be making a very late tablet push, unveiling a dedicated tablet operating system sometime next year (2012).

With Apple announcing its entry-level priced iPad 2 and with a host of Android competitors like Samsung and Motorola releasing higher-powered, more expensive entries, the tablet market is on fire.  The competition is particularly fierce on the operating system side where Apple has poured a great deal of effort to make iOS better suited for a large-screen device.  Similarly Google has put tremendous effort to complete Android 3.0 Honeycomb, which overhauls the past Android UI and makes it truly tablet-friendly.  Even HP's webOS and RIM are looking to get a piece of the tablet business

Microsoft, meanwhile stands watching on the sidelines.  While it will release some Windows 7-based tablets this year, the outlook for them is somewhat poor.  They require Intel x86 processors, and the chipmaker has struggled to deliver energy efficient Atom chips for tablets.  Another trouble spot is the Windows 7 OS itself.  The operating system isn't exactly optimized for a tablet experience, and with dedicated competitors like iOS 4.3 and Android Honeycomb 3.0 on the market, that could seriously stall sales.

Bloomberg quoted Michael Gartenberg, a New Jersey-based analyst, as meeting the news with pessimism, stating, "If 2011 is the year of the tablet wars, Microsoft will be awfully late suiting up for that battle."

And he's not alone; Goldman Sachs was scathing in a recent assessment of Microsoft and Intel's combined tablet efforts.

Then again, a late entry may not spell doom for Microsoft's tablet efforts.  Its other key mobile offering -- smartphones -- looked like a mess after the downhill slide of Windows Mobile and the abysmal failure of Kin.  But by going back to the drawing board and taking the time to reinvent, the company has delivered arguably the most innovative smart phone user interface currently available.  And with a new partnership with Nokia in hand, Microsoft could pass Apple to become the world's second largest smartphone OS maker in terms of sales if it plays its cards right.

The one worrisome sign is that Microsoft is reportedly choosing to build on top of Windows 7, adding more touch features.  While Windows 7 is arguably a great personal computer OS the question is whether even a modified version will be up to speed on tablets.  While such an approach is a quicker and easier, many were hoping the company would port the Windows Phone 7/Zune operating system to a tablet, given its more touch-centric UI.  To Microsoft's credit, many users -- including DailyTech readers -- have clamored for Windows 7-tablets.

Interestingly, Microsoft appears to be preparing to follow a similar approach that Google is following with its upcoming Chrome netbook/notebook OS, giving out test units to commercial partners and the public.  Microsoft will reportedly begin distributing device with test builds of the new OS before the end of the year.

It is unclear whether current generation Windows 7 tablets releasing this year will be upgradeable to the new OS next year, but this presumably would be the case, if hardware makers cooperate.

According to reports [1] [2] by In-Stat, the tablet business will be booming over the next several years, and will, in part, cannibalize PC sales.  In-Stat predicts over 100 new designs from Apple, Android makers (Motorola, Samsung, HTC, Sony-Ericcson, Archos, etc.), RIM, HP (webOS), MeeGo tablet makers (no major named partners), and Windows tablet makers (Dell, Lenovo, etc.) to enter the market this year.  And it predicts sales by 2014 to rise to 58 million units and by 2015 to 118 million units. 

Microsoft is also reportedly preparing its next generation version of Windows, which will support ARM CPUs for notebooks, Windows 8.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Windows Everywhere
By melgross on 3/6/2011 10:35:30 PM , Rating: 2
MS has a problem a lot of people here aren't looking at, being so concerned with the hardware problem. It's this Windows Everywhere concept that's getting them in trouble. They're so concerned that everything be, or at least look like Windows that they've had problems keeping up with everyone else. How long did it take them to get away from the dreadful UI on their phones? Years!

Now, with tablets, they insist on running full blown Windows. Why? Because they insist it will run Windows software. But it never has, really. Most of the software used on the Convertables were specially written to take advantage of the stylus. Mostly, they were checklist programs for warehouse inventory, and medical checklist programs. When the laptops were used for anything else, they were used with the keyboards and pointing devices they came with.

The vast majority of Windows programs just won't work, or work easily or properly on a Windows tablet, and that's something MS doesn't seem to understand.

So they're stuck with either trying to keep Windows with "enhancements" which don't work well, or drop the entire UI and have one that will work well, but that won't run Windows programs.

They've got a fear that if they drop backwards compatibility, their customers will go elsewhere, a fear that may come true to a certain extent. But they don't have much of a choice.

They should bite the bullet, and go to Windows Embedded Standard 7, which like Mac OS X is nicely modularized, and stick a good, but incompatible UI onto it for their tablets. That way, they would have an OS that is comparable in power to Android, iOS and WebOS, which are either based on Linux distro's or Unix. WP7 is based on CE R 3, which is a realtime OS, and is nowhere as extendable or powerful.

Doing this would also allow developers to keep a lot of code they now have, and make the ports easier, except for the UI, of course. So some programs will never make the switch, and that's too bad, but it's the way it is.

But, this will also solve the hardware problem so many are concerned with. I don't know how many here were around in the early eighties or early nineties. When the Mac first came out with its pixel based UI, it was slow because of that. DOS people laughed. But when Windows 3 came out, it cut the speed of PC's literally in half. 50% slower the moment Windows was installed! mac's were equal in speed, or even a bit faster because of Apple's experience with a graphical OS.

We see the same thing with Windows on an Atom tablet. To say it's sluggish is being kind. It's due to the UI, to a great extent. Getting rid of it for a much simpler one will solve much of that all by itself, and suddenly, the hardware will seem much faster.

Maybe they're doing that now. I really don't see anything else working for them. But they can't wait too long. Remember what happened to the Zune, by the time they got it right, it was too late, and no one cared.

"Let's face it, we're not changing the world. We're building a product that helps people buy more crap - and watch porn." -- Seagate CEO Bill Watkins

Latest Headlines

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki