Print 25 comment(s) - last by mostyle.. on Mar 4 at 7:51 AM

Robocop vows to protect the innocent and uphold the law -- roboCALLERs pretty much promise the opposite.  (Source: Orion Pictures)
Author of malicious software gets a 7 year prison sentence

An increasingly popular get-rich scheme in the world of malicious users is to somehow "trick" users' hardware into dialing or texting premium numbers.  The trick is a pretty old one, dating back 10 to 20 years.  Its efficacy has led to a pickup in such schemes within the U.S. and abroad in places like Russia and China.

The FBI has made some important progress in the fight against one such robo-dialing scheme.  The perpetrator, Asu Pala, executed a low-tech version of this scheme.  For his role in the scheme, a court this week sentenced him to 82-months (almost 7 years) in prison, fined him $7.9M USD, and ordered him to pay $2.2M USD in back taxes.  
Mr. Pala opened a small internet service provider called Sakhmet that sold dialup services. That's when a group of European criminals approached him with an ambitious scheme to use his obscure ISP as an attack platform to deliver autodialers to dialup customers in Germany, where dialup was still frequent.  The money, they promised, would be great.

And it was.  Between 2003 and 2007, the partnership raked in €12M ($16.5M USD) by serving up malicious trojan auto-dialer software that caused users modems to automatically call the German equivalent of 1-900 numbers (e.g. sex lines, etc.), racking up huge phone bills.

Mr. Pala's increasingly ostentatious displays of wealth drew the watchful eye of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigations.  When he bought a second Lamborghini sports car, they became suspicious when verifying with the IRS that his reported income was far below what he appeared to be spending.

Ultimately, Mr. Pala agreed to cooperate with the feds to try to catch his European business partners in exchange for a reduced sentence.  In May 2009 he began to work with the FBI to try to lure its partners into the U.S. for arrest.  But the plot didn't work.

Disappointed, the FBI pulled out.  Given that they felt they had credible evidence the phantom partners were in fact real, the FBI pushed for a partially reduced sentence, but Mr. Pala ended up getting a couple years in prison more than originally planned.

His lawyer, Geoffrey Nathan, insists his client didn't understand the full extent of what was going on.  He comments, "Most regrettably, it turns out that the big fish got away with the crime and they remain in operation."

While that may be true, without their serving partner, they will find it much harder to execute their attacks in the future.  And surely German authorities are now keeping a closer eye out for the perpetrators.

Mr. Pala, a New Hampshire resident, in April 2010 pled guilty in a U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, the state where his business was located.  He was sentenced this week and has the opportunity to try to appeal, should he choose to do so.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By artemicion on 3/2/2011 6:49:50 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, because I certainly want MY tax dollars spent on an investigation to track down the victims, verify their damages, and pay out what they lost.

Wouldn't it be neat if the victims could sue in some sort of CIVIL court to get their money back? That way we wouldn't have to spend government resources to do the work for them . . .

By Taft12 on 3/2/2011 7:50:30 PM , Rating: 2
Well, except for the judge, guards, bailiff, stenographer, ...

By tayb on 3/2/2011 10:46:25 PM , Rating: 1
Yeah that is just what we need. More idiots filing lawsuits.

By mindless1 on 3/4/2011 3:46:51 AM , Rating: 2
You're actually implying that when someone STEALS from you, that you should have no legal recourse?

That's amazing, or shocking, or crazy, or something...

By Murloc on 3/3/2011 11:09:47 AM , Rating: 4
using dialup in 2007 is a crime, and makes internet navigation impossible anyway so why even bother.

By mostyle on 3/4/2011 7:51:05 AM , Rating: 2
Wouldn't it be neat if the victims could sue in some sort of CIVIL court to get their money back?

This would entail individuals stepping up and taking initiative on the personal level.. It is arguable that had they done this on the beginning (maintaining updated AV and malware protection) they may not have been victims in the first place. Don get me wrong.. I'm not trying to say that if they had to protection that they have no right to recoup losses.. Just that if there WAS some lax protection on the back end it'd be reasonable that they'd rather have their court battles fought for them. Before anyone rages.. I'm not referring to grandma that wants to see the grand kids on the webcam.. But most readers here know people know people that will buy a new pc that comes with an AV subscription and one year later they bring it to their tech friend who realizes that their AV subscription expired six months ago and the owner is just blown away that they have viruses. "But.. I have anti virus software.. It came with the PC."

"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki