backtop


Print 24 comment(s) - last by superstition.. on Feb 25 at 1:48 AM


A supposedly leaked icon for "ThunderBolt" the rumored name for Apple's upcoming Intel Light Peak implementation.  (Source: Engadget)

A leaked image of uncertain credibility shows ThunderBolt co-inhabiting with the DisplayPort adapter.  (Source: Engadget)

The 13-inch MBP appears to be ditching the discrete GPU, if this leak is to be believed.  (Source: fscklog.com via Engadget)
Is Apple preparing to hurl a Thunderbolt at its users?

Apple typically updates its MacBook Pro lineup at least once a year.  After an update in July, Apple is looking to kick things off a bit early, with a refresh coming later this week according to numerous reports.

Engadget claims to have a leaked spec sheet of the 13-inch model, along with photos of the shiny new Apple notebook.

What is presumably the entry-level model at 13 inches is powered by an Intel 2.3GHz Sandy Bridge i5 processor with 3 MB of L3 cache.  That's down ever so slightly speed-wise from the current generation, but given Sandy Bridge's improvement it should be a bit faster while offering more battery life.

Apple looks to be bumping its DDR3 memory interface from 1066 MHz in the current model to 1333 MHz in the new model.  The hard drive gets a slight capacity bump, as we anticipated, jumping from 250 GB to 320 GB.

The screen resolution (1280x800) remains unchanged, as does the FaceTime camera, wireless adapters, and optical drive.

A minor addition is the inclusion of an SDXC reader, which supports both normal SD cards and the extended capacity (XC) models.

But two things really stand out about the spec sheet.  The first is the fact that Apple has ditched a discrete graphics chip, opting to go with only Sandy Bridge's built in Intel 3000 HD GPU. Hopefully its larger and higher-end models (15", 17") will have new discrete GPUs.

Graphics aside, the other intriguing note is a new port dubbed "Thunderbolt" that apparent co-inhabits the DisplayPort adaptor.  This is supposedly the implementation of Light Peak.

Light Peak is Intel's answer to USB 3.0.  Despite claims of spectacular performance, based on the fiber optics implementation, the communications format in its current form should offer little if any speed gain from USB 3.0 given that it's being reportedly implemented on copper wires.  And where USB 3.0 is an open standard that anyone can use or contribute to, LightPeak is a proprietary standard, which OEMs will have to license from Intel.

If Apple supports Light Peak, it would be the first major OEM to embrace the format.

If the specs sheet holds true, it creates an interesting dilemma for Apple buyers.  The new-ish 13-inch MacBook Air offers a superior discrete GPU, a higher resolutions screen, and is thinner/lighter.  But it comes with a much slower Intel Core 2 Duo processor and lacks built-in optical media capabilities.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: dumb move
By XZerg on 2/23/2011 1:43:45 PM , Rating: 2
Ah the good ol' supposedly Billy quotes:

640K ought to be enough for anybody.

I can see many reasons to have faster speed available - imagine daisy chaining multiple monitors with one cable or even being done away with port replicators (docking stations) that require a special port and design for each laptops? You would understand the pain of having a laptop that has no docking station port or being limited to ONE model that cost quarter the price of the laptop.

A faster port could allow for a docking station/port replicator that can have dual monitor output, usb3, esata, network, sound, ... all running simultaneously without any speed issues.

So I definitely disagree with you on USB3.0 provides all the necessary bandwidth which it does not for purpose I just mentioned.


RE: dumb move
By Johnmcl7 on 2/23/2011 2:42:06 PM , Rating: 2
Except there's no evidence Bill Gates or anyone else ever actually said that.


RE: dumb move
By XZerg on 2/23/2011 3:19:55 PM , Rating: 2
I know but it is a very known myth that it was said or is attributed to Billy.


RE: dumb move
By MGSsancho on 2/23/2011 4:33:57 PM , Rating: 2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort

Displayport already support daisy chaining of displays and allows for bidirectional communication, granted at what appears to be USB2.0.

UDI is dead so I will ignore that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Display_Inter...

Possibly HDBaseT? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDBaseT however the position of the thunderbolt in the leaked picture is not next to the ethernet interface so it is not that.

There are many companies backing DisplayPort and I am too lazy to look through all their press releases and product lineups. Apple was one the first major manufacturers to ship displayport and expecially their own open mini-displayport connector. Apple usealy jumps on newer technologies that are arguably better and cheaper to their bottom line. Maybe their implementing more of the spec than competitors or pushing it forward. Look at their SDXC support. Granted there have been linux, windows 7 and official solaris support for a while so this makes sense.

Perhapse someone else can add to or breakdown my theory.


RE: dumb move
By XZerg on 2/23/2011 10:22:37 PM , Rating: 2
i know about the daisy chaining with DP. However my other point was that need a standard port to which docking stations regardless of make or model can connect to and yet have enough bandwidth to cater to esata, usb3, hdmix2 (for 2 screen), network... Power charge would be nice to have but can be optional.


"What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders." -- Michael Dell, after being asked what to do with Apple Computer in 1997














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki