Print 31 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Feb 18 at 10:58 AM

  (Source: NVIDIA)

  (Source: NVIDIA)
Tablets using Kal-El will launch in August of 2011

The rate of advancement in system-on-chip (SoC) designs for smartphones and tablets is advancing at a rapid rate. It was too long ago that we were marveling at single-core designs approaching 1GHz core clocks, but we are now seeing single- and dual-core processors surpassing the 1GHz mark and the announcement of quad-core processors.

NVIDIA is the latest to throw its hat in the ring with the announcement of its Kal-El tablet processor (whether this chip will be officially called Tegra 3 has not yet been determined). NVIDIA is making some big claims with this quad-core processor (Kal-El also features a 12-core GPU):   

  • It will have 5x the performance of the current Tegra 2 SoC
  • It will have lower power consumption than Tegra 2 despite the increase in performance
  • It has the ability to output video at up to 2560x1600

A Coremark 1.0 benchmark result of Kal-El in action shows it absolutely obliterating its Tegra 2 predecessor (11,354 for Kal-El versus 5,840 for the Tegra 2). In fact, it was even faster than an Intel T7200 Core 2 Duo processor (2GHz, 4MB cache) that managed to pull in a score of 10,136.

Of course this is just a single benchmark so we shouldn't get too excited yet; but these early numbers look very promising. Also keep in mind that clock speeds have not been finalized, so we don't know exactly what kind of performance we'll be seeing in production silicon.

NVIDIA is currently sampling Kal-El, and is prepared to have the chip in production tablets by the third quarter of 2011. In comparison, Qualcomm's recently announced quad-core APQ8064 won't even sample until early 2012. 

It's interesting to note that Kal-El isn't the only "superhero" SoC that will be coming from NVIDIA -- the codenames for it follow-up designs include Wayne (2012), Logan (2013), and Stark (2014). Wayne will arrive one year after Kal-El, Logan will arrive a year after that, etc. By 2014, Stark is expected to offer 75 times the performance of Tegra 2.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: wow...
By corduroygt on 2/16/2011 11:03:49 AM , Rating: 2
Considering the first desktop C2D chips launched at the end of 2006 at 1.86 GHz, your timeline is off.

RE: wow...
By bpharri2 on 2/16/2011 12:24:33 PM , Rating: 2
Timeline is correct:

- C2D desktop chip: July 2006
- C2D mobile (T7200): August 2006

The original poster stated that the mobile chip could be considered "low end" for 2006-2007 when compared to the desktop chips Intel was releasing. If he had said the desktop chip was low end for 2006-2007 or that the mobile chip by itself was low end, then I'd agree with you.

As it was, the C2D desktop chips Intel released before, during, and after the T7200 launch were faster as they had more cache and faster FSB.

At least, that's the way I interpreted his statement.

RE: wow...
By mindless1 on 2/18/2011 10:58:36 AM , Rating: 2
You can't really claim "low end" compared to a desktop chip, that would be like saying a car is "low end" compared to a truck if the goal is not hauling stuff but rather the power envelope for mobile use.

Regardless, the comparison is meaningless, it's just a brief look at where mobile CPUs have been and where they are going. To try and paint it black and white instead of just some marketing trivia would miss the point that it's just PR like anything else.

"Folks that want porn can buy an Android phone." -- Steve Jobs

Latest Headlines

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki