Print 14 comment(s) - last by lawrance.. on Feb 17 at 6:55 PM

Apple is finally preparing to roll out it solution for streamlined subscriptions to periodicals.  (Source: SFN Blog)
Apple delivers yet another way for its developer community to monetize their work

One of the key reasons why Apple still retains a lead when it comes to apps (there's currently 350,000 iOS apps) -- despite having been passed by Android in market share -- is that it offers industry-leading monetization for its developers.  From direct sales to in-app purchases and ad-driven apps, Apple offers developers a number of ways to make the almighty dollar.

Now it's giving them one more.

Today Apple announced [press release] that it would be giving developers access to in-app subscriptions.  The move is designed to placate disgruntled magazine and newspaper companies, who were upset by Apple's enforcement of a prohibition on external storefronts (Apple requires those who submit apps to conduct all business that flows through the app within Apple's ecosystem.

Now periodical publishers can let Apple do the dirty work for a small cut.   Apple CEO Steve Jobs, who is currently on medical leave, but actively involved with the company's day-to-day operations, states:

Our philosophy is simple — when Apple brings a new subscriber to the app, Apple earns a 30 percent share; when the publisher brings an existing or new subscriber to the app, the publisher keeps 100 percent and Apple earns nothing. All we require is that, if a publisher is making a subscription offer outside of the app, the same (or better) offer be made inside the app, so that customers can easily subscribe with one-click right in the app. We believe that this innovative subscription service will provide publishers with a brand new opportunity to expand digital access to their content onto the iPad, iPod touch and iPhone, delighting both new and existing subscribers.

The tricky part will be that Apple is allowing developers to offer subscriptions on their own portals outside their iPhone app.  Users who sign up in this fashion for services will have to go through a separate in-app authentication process.  But businesses that sign up users in this fashion will not have to pay service fees.

Developers are still banned from putting links to their off-site purchase portal in their app.  They're also required to provide an in-app subscription option for any off-app subscription options they've made available.

Interestingly publishers are allowed to ask for additional personal information as long as they make it clear that the user will be adhering to the publisher’s privacy policy and not Apple's.  Apple says that protecting privacy is a key to the success of subscription-based apps.

So to recap for developers:

  1. You can not put links to external portals that sell subscription services.
  2. You can allow purchases on a non-linked external portal to allow users to access in-app subscription content.  The responsibility for authentication rests on developers, not Apple.
  3. You must allow an equivalent in-app subscription option to what is on the portal.
  4. You may ask for additional personal data when taking subscriptions, but you have to clarify that it's you who wants it and not Apple.
The policy seems pretty straightforward -- it's unlikely to keep everyone happy, but it seems like a decent compromise.

Apple has not made it clear how the new subscription features will be rolled out, but they'll likely be including in the upcoming release of iOS 4.3.


Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Kiffberet on 2/16/2011 7:57:41 AM , Rating: 2
The problem is, no body buys anything on Android. They expect developers to build things out of the kindest of their hearts and everything to be free.

By cjohnson2136 on 2/16/2011 2:56:25 PM , Rating: 2
Also keep in mind that to develop for iOS it cost a developer 99 dollars a year. For Android it cost 25 dollars for a lifetime. So some developers will just make stuff cause its what they like to do and if you only have a cost of 25 dollars then not much lost. But if you are paying 99 for a year to want to recoup some of that loss

By InsaneScientist on 2/17/2011 5:17:25 AM , Rating: 2
Ehhh? I've spent more on the android market in the last few months than I did over the last two years on the iTunes store with my iPod touch...
And I can't even begin to count the number of people I know with android phones that want a PAID version of the Angry Birds app so they don't have to deal with the ads.

"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton

Latest Headlines

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki