Print 12 comment(s) - last by shadowamazon.. on Feb 17 at 3:39 AM

USAF Globemaster III  (Source: U. S. Air Force photo/Staff Sgt. Brian Ferguson)
Aircraft can operate on up to 50% biofuel mixed with JP-8

The U.S. military is looking to go green across all branches. The USAF has announced that it has certified its first aircraft for use of biofuel. The first aircraft is the C-17 Globemaster III and it has been certified for unlimited usage of hydroprocessed blended bio fuels known as hydrotreated renewable jet (HRJ) fuels.

The aircraft can operate on volumetric blends of up to 50 HRJ fuel with 50% JP-8 jet fuel, which jet aircraft traditionally run on. The aircraft can also operate on 25% HRJ, 25% synthetic paraffinic kerosene fuel, and 50% JP-8.

"We're very proud of this certification," said Terry Yonkers, the assistant secretary of the Air Force for installations, environment and logistics. "By using a 'pathfinder' approach, we've taken the success of our processes developed in our previous alternative fuel certifications work and learned how to efficiently streamline our HRJ certification efforts, while guaranteeing the fuel blend will work without notable difference to the pilots."

The certification of the aircraft is part of an ongoing program by the Air Force to certify and test biofuels from non-petroleum sources. Yonkers added that the biofuels also burn cleaner than traditional jet fuels with no compounds like sulfur.

It's also important to note that the blended biofuels require no changes to the aircraft at all to use. Air Force alternative fuel certification office chief Jeff Braun said, "We expect to conclude HRJ flight testing within the next 12 months, supporting fleetwide HRJ certification within the next 22 months." He continued, "When blended as we've done, this is a potential drop-in solution for jet fuel for our aircraft, requiring no modification to systems or special handling or monitoring."

Braun also stated that the blended fuel doesn’t affect the performance of the aircraft, meaning there are no significant differences in engine stability, thrust response, or steady-state performance when burning the biofuel mix compared to straight JP-8.

The Navy has a biofuel program of its own that has been condemned by some researchers.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Missing info
By shadowamazon on 2/17/2011 3:39:54 AM , Rating: 1
i don't think this quote specifically address the issue i raised. The engine operates within the normal operating range, isn't the same as saying it can fly as far as using regular fuel.
For example, in a car, when using a bio blend, your throttle response is good simply means when you put your foot down on the gas, the car moves forward as expected. It doesn't mean you get the same mileage. If they take out the word thrust response, and say it provides same amount of thrust, then it counters my concern.

"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki